I want to spend my life 00:00:01.53\00:00:07.44 Mending broken people 00:00:07.47\00:00:12.41 I want to spend my life 00:00:12.44\00:00:18.65 Removing pain 00:00:18.68\00:00:23.65 Lord, let my words Let my words 00:00:23.69\00:00:29.86 Heal a heart that hurts 00:00:29.89\00:00:34.46 I want to spend my life 00:00:34.50\00:00:40.24 Mending broken people 00:00:40.27\00:00:45.74 I want to spend my life 00:00:45.77\00:00:51.21 Mending broken people 00:00:51.25\00:00:57.02 Hello and welcome to 3ABN Today. 00:01:07.50\00:01:09.13 My name is C.A. Murray. 00:01:09.16\00:01:10.50 And allow me once again to thank you for sharing 00:01:10.53\00:01:12.47 just a little of your busy day with us, 00:01:12.50\00:01:14.90 for your love, your prayers, your support of this ministry. 00:01:14.94\00:01:17.41 For we realize that we cannot do 00:01:17.44\00:01:19.01 what we are called to do without your help 00:01:19.04\00:01:20.68 and your partnership. 00:01:20.71\00:01:22.04 So from the bottom of our hearts 00:01:22.08\00:01:23.51 we do say thank you. 00:01:23.55\00:01:24.88 This is a very special 3ABN Today program. 00:01:24.91\00:01:27.95 First of all, we have a person here 00:01:27.98\00:01:29.32 who doesn't normally appear on this set, 00:01:29.35\00:01:31.65 though he is no doubt a familiar face to you 00:01:31.69\00:01:33.76 here at 3ABN 00:01:33.79\00:01:35.52 because he is the host of Liberty Insider. 00:01:35.56\00:01:38.56 He's also the editor of Liberty Magazine. 00:01:38.59\00:01:41.26 And he is none other than Lincoln Steed. 00:01:41.30\00:01:42.63 Lincoln, good to have you here. 00:01:42.66\00:01:44.00 Well, it's great to be on the program. 00:01:44.03\00:01:45.83 We-- first of all, I appreciate Lincoln 00:01:45.87\00:01:47.34 because he always brings good news when he comes. 00:01:47.37\00:01:49.64 He always has some thing of important to say 00:01:49.67\00:01:52.61 and perhaps what he's going to say this day 00:01:52.64\00:01:54.61 maybe is of as important as anything 00:01:54.64\00:01:57.35 he has ever said on this set. 00:01:57.38\00:01:59.28 And this person you would like talk to, 00:01:59.31\00:02:00.92 because he kind of keeps his ear 00:02:00.95\00:02:02.52 to ground he knows what's going on 00:02:02.55\00:02:03.89 in the church and in the world. 00:02:03.92\00:02:05.42 And as you all know, the Pope visited this country 00:02:05.45\00:02:10.69 just several days ago and Lincoln was in that group, 00:02:10.73\00:02:16.06 that massive number that without a number 00:02:16.10\00:02:20.74 or one would almost say. 00:02:20.77\00:02:22.87 And so we've come to sort of pick his brain 00:02:22.90\00:02:24.94 a little bit on his thoughts as respects the visit, 00:02:24.97\00:02:29.61 its impact on the church, impact this country 00:02:29.64\00:02:33.82 and just to give us an over view 00:02:33.85\00:02:35.32 and perhaps touch on some things 00:02:35.35\00:02:36.89 that you may not know or may have known 00:02:36.92\00:02:40.12 and have forgotten about. 00:02:40.16\00:02:41.49 But just to give us his feel 00:02:41.52\00:02:43.22 as editor of Liberty Magazine, 00:02:43.26\00:02:44.76 as someone who is involved in church state relations 00:02:44.79\00:02:47.86 and different kinds of things. 00:02:47.90\00:02:49.23 We wanted to sort of have him come 00:02:49.26\00:02:50.60 and just give us the digest of his quite acute mind 00:02:50.63\00:02:55.37 as to what's going on. 00:02:55.40\00:02:56.74 And Lincoln, I want to ask you, 00:02:56.77\00:02:58.11 I want to start in sort of an off beat kind of place 00:02:58.14\00:03:02.21 because you were there, you saw the security. 00:03:02.24\00:03:08.05 And as we heard the security 00:03:08.08\00:03:11.25 for this pontiff was as massive, 00:03:11.29\00:03:14.79 as great, as thorough as any head of state anywhere, 00:03:14.82\00:03:19.36 any time in the history of dealing 00:03:19.39\00:03:21.53 with these kinds of things. 00:03:21.56\00:03:22.90 Give us some sense of the flavor you got 00:03:22.93\00:03:24.30 as you looked at the security preparation. 00:03:24.33\00:03:26.27 I've never seen anything like it, you know. 00:03:26.30\00:03:27.97 I've lived in Washington 00:03:28.00\00:03:29.40 since I was quite a young fellow. 00:03:29.44\00:03:30.81 I've been through the riots that followed 00:03:30.84\00:03:33.01 Martin Luther King's assassination. 00:03:33.04\00:03:35.81 And I can remember Washington burning in the security 00:03:35.84\00:03:38.41 with the national guard and the police. 00:03:38.45\00:03:40.52 This was on a higher level in my view. 00:03:40.55\00:03:42.65 There were uniformed 00:03:42.68\00:03:44.92 and actually battle equipped ATF agents. 00:03:44.95\00:03:49.56 There were border agents, border patrol. 00:03:49.59\00:03:52.93 There were immigration officials, 00:03:52.96\00:03:55.73 there were military police, 00:03:55.76\00:03:57.60 there were homeland security, there were regular military, 00:03:57.63\00:04:03.67 of course, the local police. 00:04:03.71\00:04:05.07 There was-- and plain cloths policemen. 00:04:05.11\00:04:08.94 It was massive. 00:04:08.98\00:04:10.31 In fact, they were almost more security people 00:04:10.35\00:04:13.08 than those there to watch the video thrown 00:04:13.11\00:04:17.25 at back of the capital. 00:04:17.29\00:04:18.79 There were 55, 000 people according to one guard 00:04:18.82\00:04:21.49 when I asked him. 00:04:21.52\00:04:22.86 But they were all clustered in a huge crowd at the back. 00:04:22.89\00:04:25.26 But beyond that there was chain- link fencing 00:04:25.29\00:04:27.96 with the labyrinthine approaches 00:04:28.00\00:04:31.03 where you are corralled, 00:04:31.07\00:04:32.40 sort of like cattle being funneled into the area 00:04:32.43\00:04:35.00 and beyond that nobody. 00:04:35.04\00:04:36.71 No cars, hardly anybody walking 00:04:36.74\00:04:39.31 and they were invariable turned back. 00:04:39.34\00:04:41.34 It was crowd control on a massive scale. 00:04:41.38\00:04:43.85 So people were where they wanted them to be 00:04:43.88\00:04:46.45 and no place else. 00:04:46.48\00:04:47.82 And even the area behind the capital, 00:04:47.85\00:04:50.99 we were not all in one area. 00:04:51.02\00:04:52.79 We were divided up into at least three sections 00:04:52.82\00:04:55.56 by the chain-linked fencing. 00:04:55.59\00:04:57.13 So they just want the crowd coalescing into one group. 00:04:57.16\00:05:00.10 And I don't know what they are afraid of, 00:05:00.13\00:05:01.80 other than some attempt, you know, violent incident. 00:05:01.83\00:05:05.97 That's always possible in this modern world. 00:05:06.00\00:05:08.10 But that would have by definition be a small event. 00:05:08.14\00:05:11.17 But why there was 00:05:11.21\00:05:12.54 this sort of a militarization of downtown. 00:05:12.57\00:05:14.51 I don't really know. 00:05:14.54\00:05:16.58 Maybe they simply wanted-- 00:05:16.61\00:05:19.08 And there are a number of reasons. 00:05:19.11\00:05:20.45 One could be, they were trying to tamp down the unexpected 00:05:20.48\00:05:26.79 because as was said, this particular Pope 00:05:26.82\00:05:30.19 tended to go off script in his actions 00:05:30.23\00:05:33.76 any time he chose to do so. 00:05:33.80\00:05:35.66 Well, that's true. Yeah. 00:05:35.70\00:05:37.03 But what I read into was it's a dry run 00:05:37.07\00:05:39.73 for further events like this. 00:05:39.77\00:05:41.74 Yes, yeah. 00:05:41.77\00:05:43.10 And that's not being prophetic or dismal. 00:05:43.14\00:05:46.24 I think we're entering into a new era 00:05:46.27\00:05:48.01 where the unexpected can happen. 00:05:48.04\00:05:50.05 Things were little out of control 00:05:50.08\00:05:51.81 as the problem with Second Coming 00:05:51.85\00:05:54.92 that I like to say, things fall apart. 00:05:54.95\00:05:57.09 The center cannot hold. And they are falling apart. 00:05:57.12\00:05:59.59 Yes. 00:05:59.62\00:06:00.96 And that's part of the appeal, 00:06:00.99\00:06:02.49 I think for the secular minded politicians of this Pope. 00:06:02.52\00:06:05.93 Because he helps to give a sense of order 00:06:05.96\00:06:08.66 of what's going on. 00:06:08.70\00:06:10.37 The term was used over and over again, 00:06:10.40\00:06:13.90 "Rock star" as far as popularity is concerned. 00:06:13.94\00:06:17.41 Did you get that sense as you sort of interface 00:06:17.44\00:06:19.97 in the crowd there and talked with people 00:06:20.01\00:06:21.34 or people talked with you, did you get that kind of feel? 00:06:21.38\00:06:24.45 Well, there's no question there's an element of that. 00:06:24.48\00:06:26.92 Whether how much of-- that was because of the crowd. 00:06:26.95\00:06:30.75 I don't know the breakdown 00:06:30.79\00:06:32.12 but there was obviously a very high biased 00:06:32.15\00:06:34.32 toward Roman Catholics in the crowd. 00:06:34.36\00:06:38.19 It's natural. They have more of an interest. 00:06:38.23\00:06:41.80 Then the occasion sort of created a sense of moment. 00:06:41.83\00:06:45.73 How much of it is, 00:06:45.77\00:06:47.10 because of this individual Pope, 00:06:47.14\00:06:49.00 I don't know. 00:06:49.04\00:06:50.37 I think one thing builds on another 00:06:50.41\00:06:52.57 and we've created a sort of a persona 00:06:52.61\00:06:54.74 or the media has created a persona for this present Pope 00:06:54.78\00:06:58.51 and all that he represents and people respond to the hope 00:06:58.55\00:07:02.25 that's thrown at them. 00:07:02.28\00:07:03.62 Yeah. 00:07:03.65\00:07:04.99 His style was not flamboyant. 00:07:05.02\00:07:06.86 What he said was actually a little more muted 00:07:06.89\00:07:09.02 than some of his recent pronouncements in his writings, 00:07:09.06\00:07:12.93 although they were allusions there. 00:07:12.96\00:07:14.30 And we'll talk a little further about 00:07:14.33\00:07:15.83 what went on there. 00:07:15.86\00:07:17.20 But I think we're being conditioned as a society 00:07:17.23\00:07:21.00 and even as a world society 00:07:21.04\00:07:22.94 to sort of see this is a grand moment. 00:07:22.97\00:07:26.21 But if you look at dispassionately, 00:07:26.24\00:07:28.01 it's an old guy in a white dress. 00:07:28.04\00:07:33.42 Sorry. 00:07:33.45\00:07:36.62 I guess that is a way to look at it. 00:07:36.65\00:07:38.89 And of course, a lot of this 00:07:38.92\00:07:40.72 and how much of this is his personal charisma, 00:07:40.76\00:07:43.49 how much of this is response to media hype 00:07:43.53\00:07:45.56 because every sneeze, 00:07:45.59\00:07:47.53 every move was talked about again, and again and again. 00:07:47.56\00:07:50.93 Now I need to throw something 00:07:50.97\00:07:52.30 in because I might say things before this program is over. 00:07:52.33\00:07:55.04 But my father who's been dead eight years ago now, 00:07:55.07\00:07:57.91 but he had many dealings with world leaders 00:07:57.94\00:07:59.81 and on the international stage. 00:07:59.84\00:08:01.68 And he believed like me 00:08:01.71\00:08:03.24 and you as a Seventh-day Adventist 00:08:03.28\00:08:05.05 that we are living through prophetic events. 00:08:05.08\00:08:07.65 Many times I tell him some things 00:08:07.68\00:08:09.18 that were happening 00:08:09.22\00:08:10.89 and his invariable response was, "Isn't it exciting?" 00:08:10.92\00:08:15.42 He says, "The Lord is about to come." 00:08:15.46\00:08:18.13 So one level we can work ourselves into a lather, 00:08:18.16\00:08:21.50 the historical diminution of Protestant America 00:08:21.53\00:08:26.07 or the apparent leaness of some of the final events 00:08:26.10\00:08:29.74 of Revelation, Sunday law and so on. 00:08:29.77\00:08:32.14 But the overall context is exciting 00:08:32.17\00:08:34.78 because we are surging toward the grand moment 00:08:34.81\00:08:36.68 when Christ will come. 00:08:36.71\00:08:38.05 Yes. 00:08:38.08\00:08:39.41 But I, particularly, 00:08:39.45\00:08:40.78 when I talk to Seventh-day Adventist 00:08:40.82\00:08:42.15 I sense a sort of a paranoia that can easily come into this. 00:08:42.18\00:08:46.59 I remember at one church I was talking to a group about 00:08:46.62\00:08:49.76 these types of events and a fellow on the front seat 00:08:49.79\00:08:52.86 called out to me, he says, "Tell us," he says, 00:08:52.89\00:08:54.76 "when should we be afraid?" 00:08:54.80\00:08:58.73 Well, you know, "Perfect love casts out fear." 00:08:58.77\00:09:00.57 "Casts our fear." Yeah. We should be afraid. 00:09:00.60\00:09:01.94 But we need to be sorbent about these things. 00:09:01.97\00:09:04.81 This is not time for secular happiness in the sense that, 00:09:04.84\00:09:07.81 you know, vine, woman and song and happiness 00:09:07.84\00:09:09.68 and just empty celebration. 00:09:09.71\00:09:13.31 These are serious times. They are, they are. 00:09:13.35\00:09:15.22 And it's very obvious to me 00:09:15.25\00:09:17.59 that the bishop of Rome is playing for keeps. 00:09:17.62\00:09:19.72 Oh, yeah. 00:09:19.75\00:09:21.09 This is not just a PR endeavor to come to America. 00:09:21.12\00:09:24.56 This is the seat of Protestant, modern Protestantism. 00:09:24.59\00:09:28.86 And for the bishop of Rome to come here 00:09:28.90\00:09:31.53 as the conquering hero, is a grand historical moment 00:09:31.57\00:09:35.17 that people should understand for what it is. 00:09:35.20\00:09:37.81 It's something unprecedented 00:09:37.84\00:09:41.58 and it fits in to the stated plans 00:09:41.61\00:09:45.51 of the papacy over at least a hundred years. 00:09:45.55\00:09:48.65 And it fits into prophecy. 00:09:48.68\00:09:50.35 Yeah, yeah, and you know-- 00:09:50.39\00:09:51.72 And I said that on this air that when you look at Europe, 00:09:51.75\00:09:56.32 you got a lot of beautiful churches that are empty. 00:09:56.36\00:09:58.69 So when you talk about Protestantism as a movement, 00:09:58.73\00:10:02.13 you're talking about the United States. 00:10:02.16\00:10:03.50 And there is no way to get around that. 00:10:03.53\00:10:04.93 Well, North America. 00:10:04.97\00:10:07.10 So if you want to, and I use the term 00:10:07.14\00:10:09.17 in very general term, is conquer Protestantism. 00:10:09.20\00:10:11.24 If you want to have impact, 00:10:11.27\00:10:12.61 you got to have the impact here. 00:10:12.64\00:10:14.31 There is no way to get away from that. 00:10:14.34\00:10:16.85 Besides-- and I want you to give us 00:10:16.88\00:10:20.72 a little more of a historical perspective. 00:10:20.75\00:10:25.52 Because I've been in conversations 00:10:25.55\00:10:26.89 where people have said, one of the things 00:10:26.92\00:10:28.92 that the Pope was able to do, and I use the term, 00:10:28.96\00:10:33.23 sanitize the image of the Catholic Church. 00:10:33.26\00:10:36.83 There was up until just a few years ago 00:10:36.87\00:10:38.57 when you thought about the Catholic Church, 00:10:38.60\00:10:41.30 you thought about the priestly misbehavior 00:10:41.34\00:10:45.71 and that was front and center. 00:10:45.74\00:10:48.28 That's what you thought about. 00:10:48.31\00:10:51.38 And in the two years the time and change 00:10:51.41\00:10:54.48 that he's been in, the thought is different. 00:10:54.52\00:10:57.19 He's been able-- so give us in broad strokes 00:10:57.22\00:11:00.69 some of the context of the history of the church 00:11:00.72\00:11:03.26 and from where you sitting what you said. 00:11:03.29\00:11:04.73 Well, you touch on one thing 00:11:04.76\00:11:06.09 that I have no personal answer to. 00:11:06.13\00:11:07.80 I don't understand how a system and to repeat 00:11:07.83\00:11:13.60 which has such a systemic problem 00:11:13.64\00:11:16.81 with this sexual abuse. 00:11:16.84\00:11:21.04 You know, it's not just that it happens 00:11:21.08\00:11:22.61 to some of the priests or been indulged in. 00:11:22.64\00:11:24.28 This is the byproduct of the very structure 00:11:24.31\00:11:26.58 and the aberrant behavior that's required of a priest. 00:11:26.61\00:11:30.35 Yes. 00:11:30.39\00:11:31.72 You know, I could even say it's unnatural. 00:11:31.75\00:11:33.69 I don't understand how with that scandal going on 00:11:33.72\00:11:37.39 and it's going away. 00:11:37.43\00:11:41.00 The whole edifice of Rome represented 00:11:41.03\00:11:42.96 by the Pope himself 00:11:43.00\00:11:44.80 is never been higher in public estimation. 00:11:44.83\00:11:47.64 I don't understand that. 00:11:47.67\00:11:49.80 Part of the way that they rehabilitated themselves 00:11:49.84\00:11:52.37 was in a document, less than a decade ago 00:11:52.41\00:11:56.11 called Memory and Reconciliation. 00:11:56.14\00:11:59.58 And in that document-- 00:11:59.61\00:12:00.95 Which was reported widely in the media. 00:12:00.98\00:12:02.95 This was under, 00:12:02.98\00:12:04.32 well, it's a bit more than a decade ago 00:12:04.35\00:12:05.69 with Pope John Paul II 00:12:05.72\00:12:07.06 in the winding days of his papacy. 00:12:07.09\00:12:08.92 They came out with a document written by his successor 00:12:08.96\00:12:11.53 who was then head of the inquisition, 00:12:11.56\00:12:14.80 Cardinal Ratzinger. 00:12:14.83\00:12:16.93 And they apologized 00:12:16.97\00:12:18.63 for the inquisition, they apologized 00:12:18.67\00:12:20.84 for the persecution of the Jews, 00:12:20.87\00:12:22.37 they apologized for the sack of Constantinople, 00:12:22.40\00:12:24.67 which was the fourth Crusade 00:12:24.71\00:12:27.14 that was manipulated by several forces including Venice 00:12:27.18\00:12:31.81 and the bishop of Rome to neutralize their opposition 00:12:31.85\00:12:35.62 in the Christian world. 00:12:35.65\00:12:36.99 Yes. 00:12:37.02\00:12:38.35 That was the cause of the great split 00:12:38.39\00:12:39.72 between Eastern Orthodox and the Roman Catholic Church. 00:12:39.75\00:12:41.79 Roman Catholic Church, yeah. 00:12:41.82\00:12:43.16 All of this is apologized for in a sort of a-- 00:12:43.19\00:12:45.66 I've got children 00:12:45.69\00:12:47.03 and they often have to apologize. 00:12:47.06\00:12:48.80 They tend not to apologize full frontal. 00:12:48.83\00:12:51.97 It's like, "If I did this or... 00:12:52.00\00:12:54.24 If I offended you, I'm sorry. 00:12:54.27\00:12:55.60 And I must admit, the document is a little in that manner. 00:12:55.64\00:12:59.04 It holds back the magisterium or the innate authority 00:12:59.07\00:13:03.24 and goodness of the church saying it, 00:13:03.28\00:13:04.71 of course, can't do any wrong. 00:13:04.75\00:13:06.58 But people who happen to be Catholics did these things 00:13:06.61\00:13:09.38 that we apologize for. 00:13:09.42\00:13:11.12 But it was a very important document 00:13:11.15\00:13:14.09 that was well reported on and I think Rome intended 00:13:14.12\00:13:18.49 and it seems to have worked 00:13:18.53\00:13:20.10 that they've cut themselves loose from their history, 00:13:20.13\00:13:23.26 which, of course, includes the issue with Protestantism. 00:13:23.30\00:13:26.87 The coerced Protestantism. Yes. 00:13:26.90\00:13:28.37 So they are very unembarrassed now about the past. 00:13:28.40\00:13:31.34 And many Protestants in the United States 00:13:31.37\00:13:35.04 seem also to have cut loose from their past 00:13:35.08\00:13:37.71 and forgotten why they are Protestants. 00:13:37.75\00:13:39.41 So it's a very dangerous past in my view, 00:13:39.45\00:13:42.45 to forget your history, you know, within our church, 00:13:42.48\00:13:46.52 Ellen White writing to early Adventists 00:13:46.55\00:13:48.52 as well as other secular figures outside 00:13:48.56\00:13:51.23 in national affairs have often reminded people 00:13:51.26\00:13:54.13 that you forget history at your peril. 00:13:54.16\00:13:57.17 Yes, yes. 00:13:57.20\00:13:58.53 And that's what really troubled me 00:13:58.57\00:14:00.77 of the recent events with this latest visit of a Pope of Rome, 00:14:00.80\00:14:03.94 of course, there's been two before him 00:14:03.97\00:14:06.04 that I can remember in my lifetime. 00:14:06.07\00:14:08.04 But we're forgetting our history. 00:14:08.08\00:14:10.18 And yet, in the case of the Roman Catholic Church, 00:14:10.21\00:14:14.72 and the Curia, or the administered as it-- 00:14:14.75\00:14:19.42 and the magisterium that they depend on. 00:14:19.45\00:14:23.19 It has not changed at all. 00:14:23.22\00:14:24.56 Its goals are unchanged and incompatible 00:14:24.59\00:14:28.46 with the principles of Protestantism. 00:14:28.50\00:14:30.83 And indeed and this is that level 00:14:30.87\00:14:32.20 that I tried to confine it 00:14:32.23\00:14:33.67 to Liberty Magazine which deals 00:14:33.70\00:14:35.60 with religious liberty for all people. 00:14:35.64\00:14:38.47 On the level of religious liberty, 00:14:38.51\00:14:40.11 of course, doesn't matter what people believe 00:14:40.14\00:14:42.48 when you're fighting for religious liberty. 00:14:42.51\00:14:44.58 I might feel that I am true, a Muslim feels 00:14:44.61\00:14:46.58 that he has a correct belief, 00:14:46.61\00:14:48.25 a Catholic, various Protestants, 00:14:48.28\00:14:50.55 Buddhists and so on. 00:14:50.59\00:14:51.92 It's immaterial the truth of your belief 00:14:51.95\00:14:53.76 but for religious liberty, is a principle 00:14:53.79\00:14:56.19 all should be allowed to believe 00:14:56.22\00:14:58.49 whatever moves their heart. 00:14:58.53\00:15:01.36 They should be allowed to practice it, 00:15:01.40\00:15:02.83 to change it and so on. 00:15:02.86\00:15:04.40 And in the United States that further mandates 00:15:04.43\00:15:07.17 a separation of church and state, 00:15:07.20\00:15:09.20 which is a safety mechanism to allow religion to flourish. 00:15:09.24\00:15:13.64 And this is the mortal threat in my view, 00:15:13.68\00:15:17.05 to invite the bishop of Rome and to address the politicians 00:15:17.08\00:15:21.05 as ahead of state 00:15:21.08\00:15:23.49 because you have a religious leader speaking 00:15:23.52\00:15:26.76 as a politician to politicians, 00:15:26.79\00:15:29.32 in a country that is premised 00:15:29.36\00:15:30.86 on the separation of church and state. 00:15:30.89\00:15:32.66 On that level, I think we should yell it 00:15:32.69\00:15:35.73 from the housetops on the level of discussing 00:15:35.76\00:15:39.03 the errors of Rome, 00:15:39.07\00:15:40.47 this program is very appropriate 00:15:40.50\00:15:41.87 because we are talking to a religious audience. 00:15:41.90\00:15:43.47 But I hope people understand 00:15:43.51\00:15:45.97 that religious liberty construct, 00:15:46.01\00:15:48.88 the civil construct, on that level, 00:15:48.91\00:15:51.55 it's the structure of the organization, 00:15:51.58\00:15:53.68 on the level of Biblical truth and fulfill prophecy. 00:15:53.72\00:15:58.42 Of course, there's a lot more going on. 00:15:58.45\00:16:01.12 Flash that out for me just a little bit, Lincoln, 00:16:01.16\00:16:02.79 because a person who perhaps doesn't look much below 00:16:02.82\00:16:08.30 the surface may say, "So what's the problem?" 00:16:08.33\00:16:11.07 He's talking about moral stuff, he is a moral guy 00:16:11.10\00:16:15.00 and we're talking about family, 00:16:15.04\00:16:17.77 we're talking about taking care of the earth. 00:16:17.81\00:16:21.54 What's wrong with a church leader 00:16:21.58\00:16:25.91 bringing that stuff up before Congress? 00:16:25.95\00:16:29.12 Well, back to my basic point. 00:16:29.15\00:16:32.15 The US constitution was a well thought out document. 00:16:32.19\00:16:36.16 It's not giving on man's signing hour 00:16:36.19\00:16:38.69 but it was well thought through. 00:16:38.73\00:16:40.06 And it followed in the tradition 00:16:40.10\00:16:43.33 of liberal democratic views 00:16:43.37\00:16:45.37 that had engulfed most of Europe 00:16:45.40\00:16:47.77 and fled through England. 00:16:47.80\00:16:50.44 Got rid of the-- 00:16:50.47\00:16:53.64 Well, I was hesitating to tell the whole story which I won't. 00:16:53.68\00:16:56.41 But, you know, England had a religious civil war. 00:16:56.44\00:16:58.28 Yes. 00:16:58.31\00:16:59.65 And they removed the king who as the Pope 00:16:59.68\00:17:03.28 and the kings that many Popes put in place. 00:17:03.32\00:17:06.92 He held the view that he had a divine right to rule. 00:17:06.96\00:17:10.33 So he won't just challenging 00:17:10.36\00:17:13.76 the autocorrect rule of the king. 00:17:13.80\00:17:15.13 You were challenging God. 00:17:15.16\00:17:16.50 But Protestant views in England 00:17:16.53\00:17:19.17 and the enlightenment views that they gave us, 00:17:19.20\00:17:22.54 sense of the rights of the individual swept away 00:17:22.57\00:17:25.01 that old system and that moved across 00:17:25.04\00:17:27.68 into the United States 00:17:27.71\00:17:29.04 and we have a well thought out democratic principle 00:17:29.08\00:17:33.45 that removed religion from the political arena. 00:17:33.48\00:17:38.82 But the danger now is we're inviting it back. 00:17:38.85\00:17:42.49 And like I said, we're blindsided 00:17:42.52\00:17:44.56 when we have- 00:17:44.59\00:17:46.59 'cause there's only really one vacuum, 00:17:46.63\00:17:48.83 when you have the Pope of Rome 00:17:48.86\00:17:50.57 who as they introduced him as the Pope of the Holy Sea. 00:17:50.60\00:17:54.90 And I thought that was a very interesting term 00:17:54.94\00:17:57.27 that was used because the Holy Sea 00:17:57.31\00:17:58.91 is not the little 110, 120 acre of Vatican City 00:17:58.94\00:18:03.38 which is the smallest city state in the world, 00:18:03.41\00:18:06.01 which gives him governmental authority. 00:18:06.05\00:18:09.55 The Holy Sea is a little bit different. 00:18:09.58\00:18:12.45 That is the ecclesiastical governance 00:18:12.49\00:18:16.39 that the Pope claims as the Pope of Rome. 00:18:16.42\00:18:19.66 So this is a spiritual property 00:18:19.69\00:18:23.50 and it could even be enlarged to say 00:18:23.53\00:18:25.47 because every bishop has a sea that's under the Pope. 00:18:25.50\00:18:28.97 In essence as when they introduced him 00:18:29.00\00:18:30.51 as the Pope of the Holy Sea, 00:18:30.54\00:18:33.51 this was a spiritual claim to almost the entire world 00:18:33.54\00:18:36.28 if not the Christian world. 00:18:36.31\00:18:37.65 Precisely. Yeah. 00:18:37.68\00:18:39.01 And that's so antithetical to the democratic Protestant 00:18:39.05\00:18:44.29 egalitarian view of government that it's mind boggling. 00:18:44.32\00:18:47.99 But the current trend in Protestantism sees to be, 00:18:48.02\00:18:51.93 to embrace that. 00:18:51.96\00:18:53.83 From where you said. 00:18:53.86\00:18:55.20 Well, we should be pleasant to the Pope 00:18:55.23\00:18:58.10 or to the Mullah or the Imam. 00:18:58.13\00:19:01.04 We're all human beings an this a great truth 00:19:01.07\00:19:04.24 that the Pope has talked about 00:19:04.27\00:19:05.61 that you know, our common home, 00:19:05.64\00:19:07.74 common survival here on this planet 00:19:07.78\00:19:09.44 is depended on all obeying 00:19:09.48\00:19:12.61 the reasonable rules of behavior 00:19:12.65\00:19:15.25 and seeking to create communication 00:19:15.28\00:19:19.55 and even survival of the species 00:19:19.59\00:19:21.62 through care for the environment. 00:19:21.66\00:19:26.23 But that's not the same as embracing as truth 00:19:26.26\00:19:29.36 something that I'm convinced might be error. 00:19:29.40\00:19:31.27 Yes. 00:19:31.30\00:19:32.63 Or negating a structural element of a church state 00:19:32.67\00:19:39.54 that in the past has proven 00:19:39.57\00:19:41.14 to be quite dangerous to individual freedom. 00:19:41.18\00:19:43.51 We have to have our guard up. 00:19:43.55\00:19:44.88 Yeah, yeah. 00:19:44.91\00:19:46.25 This then is-- the question 00:19:46.28\00:19:48.95 that I'm going to ask you 00:19:48.98\00:19:50.82 because from your vantage point, 00:19:50.85\00:19:54.96 how conversant do you think the average Protestant 00:19:54.99\00:19:57.79 is with his own history, vis-a-vis the Catholic Church. 00:19:57.83\00:20:03.60 Pretty good, pretty bad, fair, how... 00:20:03.63\00:20:05.83 That's where I'm most depressed on this whole thing. 00:20:05.87\00:20:08.50 Yes. 00:20:08.54\00:20:09.90 You know, this visit came and went 00:20:09.94\00:20:12.27 and the world hasn't changed, although the world has changed 00:20:12.31\00:20:15.24 in the last few decades radically in regard to this. 00:20:15.28\00:20:18.88 But I think it's now just a matter of time, 00:20:18.91\00:20:21.38 not of necessary change to facilitate 00:20:21.42\00:20:24.62 what Seventh-day Adventist has said will eventually result 00:20:24.65\00:20:27.92 in legal requirements in the United States 00:20:27.96\00:20:32.06 to act a certain way on religious edicts, 00:20:32.09\00:20:35.96 perhaps even a Sunday law. 00:20:36.00\00:20:40.27 Not this presidential election cycle 00:20:40.30\00:20:42.34 but the one before a Roman Catholic Senator, 00:20:42.37\00:20:46.31 Senator Santorum, he's a wonderful human being. 00:20:46.34\00:20:48.88 We've had some dealings with him 00:20:48.91\00:20:51.01 through our church's legislative liaison group 00:20:51.05\00:20:55.28 with that we were hoping to get a work place 00:20:55.32\00:20:57.59 Religious Freedom Restoration Act 00:20:57.62\00:20:59.35 and he was very cooperative. 00:20:59.39\00:21:00.72 But he was running for president. 00:21:00.76\00:21:02.22 He's a dedicated Roman Catholic 00:21:02.26\00:21:04.49 and he made a statement that created quite a furor 00:21:04.53\00:21:08.16 but I think it was a correct statement. 00:21:08.20\00:21:10.20 He said, remember, speaking as a Roman Catholic politician, 00:21:10.23\00:21:14.07 he said "Protestantism is absent in America today." 00:21:14.10\00:21:19.14 That I believe is how the Roman Catholic Church 00:21:19.17\00:21:21.78 sees the United States today. 00:21:21.81\00:21:24.01 Its Protestant character has largely gone. 00:21:24.05\00:21:28.28 So then you are basically right for the picking. 00:21:28.32\00:21:30.89 Right, that's what I think. Yeah. 00:21:30.92\00:21:32.69 There's no inhibition to whatever might come our way. 00:21:32.72\00:21:37.46 When I say no, I mean, I'm generalizing. 00:21:37.49\00:21:39.26 Yes, yes, understood. You can go on the internet.` 00:21:39.29\00:21:40.80 There's all sorts of objections and some of it very-- 00:21:40.83\00:21:45.07 some of them very crazy because, you know, 00:21:45.10\00:21:46.77 they go out to the far spectrum. 00:21:46.80\00:21:48.34 There-- some awareness there 00:21:48.37\00:21:49.70 but in the whole, 00:21:49.74\00:21:51.51 I think the Protestant awareness is dissipated. 00:21:51.54\00:21:54.41 Okay, okay. 00:21:54.44\00:21:55.78 And that could be for any number of things. 00:21:55.81\00:21:58.15 The question is if it's fumbling itself 00:21:58.18\00:22:00.08 in my mind is, if I say the following names, you-- 00:22:00.12\00:22:05.79 they strike a chord in your mind, 00:22:05.82\00:22:07.49 Albigenses, Waldenses, Cathari, 00:22:07.52\00:22:13.80 trying to think some other groups, 00:22:13.83\00:22:15.16 you have a context for those names. 00:22:15.20\00:22:19.00 Well-- let me give you a plain fact 00:22:19.03\00:22:22.30 of American public lives 00:22:22.34\00:22:23.67 that I think based on whether this isknown. 00:22:23.71\00:22:26.81 Once-- it's possible 00:22:26.84\00:22:28.61 during the presidential election. 00:22:28.64\00:22:30.08 People have a fairly good recognition 00:22:30.11\00:22:32.01 of who is running or perhaps who is president. 00:22:32.05\00:22:34.75 But in the in between times, 00:22:34.78\00:22:36.25 it's been shown that the over whelming majority 00:22:36.28\00:22:38.85 of Americans cannot name the sitting president. 00:22:38.89\00:22:42.86 So do you think that they know who the Albigenses are? 00:22:42.89\00:22:47.80 The Waldenses? Yeah. 00:22:47.83\00:22:49.53 But the lack of knowledge or understanding 00:22:49.56\00:22:52.03 impacts upon your desire or your ability, 00:22:52.07\00:22:55.44 your capacity to embrace a doctrinal system 00:22:55.47\00:23:00.21 which is really antithetical to your own. 00:23:00.24\00:23:02.48 You are a Protestant. 00:23:02.51\00:23:04.51 There's a lot of people who couldn't define that term 00:23:04.55\00:23:07.68 and don't know when it began, where it began, how it began, 00:23:07.72\00:23:11.12 and the pushback against that term 00:23:11.15\00:23:13.79 from the Roman Catholic Church. 00:23:13.82\00:23:15.16 That's why I brought those names to you 00:23:15.19\00:23:16.52 because if those groups were not exterminated, 00:23:16.56\00:23:19.56 they were close to exterminated. 00:23:19.59\00:23:21.03 So there was a history that the average American 00:23:21.06\00:23:24.33 is not aware of 00:23:24.37\00:23:25.70 and it impacts upon his willingness 00:23:25.73\00:23:28.30 to sort of hold hands and sing Kumbaya 00:23:28.34\00:23:29.84 because he doesn't know the... 00:23:29.87\00:23:31.21 And what's important about those groups and-- 00:23:31.24\00:23:33.88 They were in Europe 00:23:33.91\00:23:36.54 around 250 years plus ago. 00:23:36.58\00:23:42.18 But they were not persecuted by the Roman Catholic Church. 00:23:42.22\00:23:45.19 They were persecuted at a time 00:23:45.22\00:23:46.82 when the Roman Catholic Church was the confidant 00:23:46.86\00:23:49.99 and indeed the legitimizing power 00:23:50.03\00:23:53.16 for all of the secular powers. 00:23:53.19\00:23:54.53 Yes, yes. 00:23:54.56\00:23:55.90 And they told the different powers 00:23:55.93\00:23:58.33 like the Dukes of Savoy and so on. 00:23:58.37\00:24:00.87 "These are unacceptable religious minorities, 00:24:00.90\00:24:03.44 deal with them." 00:24:03.47\00:24:04.81 Yes, yes. 00:24:04.84\00:24:06.17 And all the... 00:24:06.21\00:24:07.54 So the church used the powers that were there... 00:24:07.58\00:24:09.44 I can tell you, the Protestant sensibility 00:24:09.48\00:24:11.45 during the-- in England 00:24:11.48\00:24:13.48 when Oliver Cromwell, 00:24:13.52\00:24:15.15 who's been spoken badly of many historians 00:24:15.18\00:24:19.12 but in reality, 00:24:19.15\00:24:20.49 who is a champion of Protestantism. 00:24:20.52\00:24:22.16 While he was Lord Protector of England, 00:24:22.19\00:24:24.26 after the civil war, 00:24:24.29\00:24:25.76 he heard about the case of the Waldenses 00:24:25.79\00:24:28.40 and he said that unless they stop persecuting them, 00:24:28.43\00:24:31.17 he would lead an English Protestant army 00:24:31.20\00:24:33.13 to relieve them. 00:24:33.17\00:24:34.50 So that was the sensibility of Protestantism in England 00:24:34.54\00:24:38.34 and that was carried across, 00:24:38.37\00:24:40.31 of course, to United States in its infancy. 00:24:40.34\00:24:45.51 We've kept a separation of church and state 00:24:45.55\00:24:47.32 but the Protestant sensibility was very strong. 00:24:47.35\00:24:49.82 Let me tell you something in the speech. 00:24:49.85\00:24:51.75 We haven't spoken about the Pope's speech 00:24:51.79\00:24:53.49 before Congress. 00:24:53.52\00:24:55.82 Overall, it was not an objectionable speech, 00:24:55.86\00:24:58.56 although we need to deconstruct it a little what was in there. 00:24:58.59\00:25:02.63 I came originally from Australia 00:25:02.66\00:25:04.13 but I've lived most of my life in the United States. 00:25:04.17\00:25:06.30 So I hope I think like an American. 00:25:06.33\00:25:08.64 And as I sat there at the back listening, 00:25:08.67\00:25:11.51 I was just dumbstruck 00:25:11.54\00:25:13.34 with what the Pope did in his speech. 00:25:13.38\00:25:15.04 He based it, you know, it was all themed 00:25:15.08\00:25:17.85 on linking into his encyclical on the environment. 00:25:17.88\00:25:21.65 He was using a lot of those same ideas, 00:25:21.68\00:25:24.45 not so direct as in the document 00:25:24.49\00:25:26.96 but he was alluding to that. 00:25:26.99\00:25:28.52 He was alluding to what we might discuss 00:25:28.56\00:25:30.23 a little more things like the common good, 00:25:30.26\00:25:32.23 reciprocity and so on, subsidiarity. 00:25:32.26\00:25:36.93 But he structured his speech around four individuals. 00:25:36.97\00:25:40.30 They were two Roman Catholics, a man and a woman. 00:25:40.34\00:25:42.67 I know why he did that. 00:25:42.70\00:25:44.04 That was to integrate Roman Catholic faith 00:25:44.07\00:25:47.84 and practice and heroes and heroines 00:25:47.88\00:25:51.71 into American, Americana. 00:25:51.75\00:25:54.52 But his other-- the other two characters, 00:25:54.55\00:25:57.35 one made perfect sense 00:25:57.39\00:25:58.72 'cause he resonated with the themes 00:25:58.75\00:26:00.46 he was talking about was Martin Luther King. 00:26:00.49\00:26:03.12 The first one was Abraham Lincoln. 00:26:03.16\00:26:04.83 Yes. 00:26:04.86\00:26:06.66 Did it strike you as a little odd? 00:26:06.70\00:26:08.53 Yeah, it just seems sort of an unnatural placement 00:26:08.56\00:26:12.50 of that particular figure in what he was trying to do. 00:26:12.53\00:26:14.94 And now, I read a lot. 00:26:14.97\00:26:16.30 I don't claim to have read everything 00:26:16.34\00:26:17.77 that's been printed since then. 00:26:17.81\00:26:19.51 But reading and listening, 00:26:19.54\00:26:21.28 I have yet had to see a comment by anybody 00:26:21.31\00:26:24.38 as to what was going on there. 00:26:24.41\00:26:26.25 Yeah. 00:26:26.28\00:26:27.62 I think this was like waving a red rag 00:26:27.65\00:26:29.38 in front of someone to see if there even color- sensitive. 00:26:29.42\00:26:35.32 Because Abraham Lincoln was assassinated, 00:26:35.36\00:26:37.89 most people remember by John Wilkes Booth. 00:26:37.93\00:26:41.50 They might have forgotten. 00:26:41.53\00:26:42.86 There was a conspiracy. Four other people were hanged. 00:26:42.90\00:26:46.94 Yes. 00:26:46.97\00:26:48.30 And four or five were arrested 00:26:48.34\00:26:50.21 and received long prison sentences. 00:26:50.24\00:26:51.57 It was a conspiracy in the home of Mary Surratt. 00:26:51.61\00:26:54.34 Yes, yes, yes. 00:26:54.38\00:26:55.71 Her brother, which is interesting 00:26:55.74\00:26:59.11 part of the story fled the authorities 00:26:59.15\00:27:02.55 and went to Canada, 00:27:02.58\00:27:05.75 who sheltered by Roman Catholic priest. 00:27:05.79\00:27:07.92 Then he went to Rome 00:27:07.96\00:27:09.29 and ended up in the Pope's bodyguard. 00:27:09.32\00:27:11.06 All but one of the conspiritants 00:27:11.09\00:27:13.19 were Roman Catholics. 00:27:13.23\00:27:15.56 They were several priests that were in that home. 00:27:15.60\00:27:17.97 And the time more significant-- 00:27:18.00\00:27:20.34 what really happened at the time, 00:27:20.37\00:27:22.50 America believed that it was a Jesuit plot 00:27:22.54\00:27:25.21 to kill Abraham Lincoln. 00:27:25.24\00:27:26.57 Yeah, I recall that. 00:27:26.61\00:27:27.94 Yeah, there's a great book 00:27:27.98\00:27:29.31 came out just a couple of years ago. 00:27:29.34\00:27:30.68 Real thick one that I began to read... 00:27:30.71\00:27:32.05 And at the moment, Robert Redford 00:27:32.08\00:27:33.42 is doing a film on this. 00:27:33.45\00:27:34.78 So it's gonna come up again. 00:27:34.82\00:27:36.95 The very least of it, keep quiet about that. 00:27:36.99\00:27:41.09 You know that was a period 00:27:41.12\00:27:42.62 when not only was the United States 00:27:42.66\00:27:44.79 deeply Protestant, it was deeply prejudiced 00:27:44.83\00:27:47.36 against Catholics, often violently. 00:27:47.40\00:27:49.06 And that's not a good part of American history. 00:27:49.10\00:27:51.47 True. 00:27:51.50\00:27:53.03 But it was the extreme manifestation 00:27:53.07\00:27:55.50 of this solid Protestant identity 00:27:55.54\00:27:59.24 that was the time when the Pope of Rome 00:27:59.27\00:28:01.84 was railing against 00:28:01.88\00:28:03.45 this Protestant experiment here. 00:28:03.48\00:28:06.58 Its success in the civil war was problematic 00:28:06.61\00:28:10.59 for the geopolitical aims of the papacy in Europe. 00:28:10.62\00:28:15.06 And they had made murmuring comments 00:28:15.09\00:28:18.23 against Abraham Lincoln. 00:28:18.26\00:28:19.66 So it was not unnatural for America to think 00:28:19.69\00:28:21.90 that this is not just a few people 00:28:21.93\00:28:24.67 that happen to be Roman Catholic, 00:28:24.70\00:28:26.17 that there was something seditious going on 00:28:26.20\00:28:28.84 instigated by papacy as they used to say. 00:28:28.87\00:28:31.21 Yes. 00:28:31.24\00:28:32.57 That's just the fact of history. 00:28:32.61\00:28:34.28 Which has been lost over in these many years. 00:28:34.31\00:28:37.05 Few people know that. 00:28:37.08\00:28:38.41 So few people would have connected the dots on that. 00:28:38.45\00:28:39.85 And the Pope got every right to speak of it. 00:28:39.88\00:28:41.48 You know, it's a free world. 00:28:41.52\00:28:43.15 And I'm sure I doubt they got the script 00:28:43.18\00:28:45.25 from him in Venice but this is just amazing to me 00:28:45.29\00:28:47.69 that there would be the boldness to put it there 00:28:47.72\00:28:49.99 and the de-sensitivity, or the lack of memory 00:28:50.03\00:28:52.83 that anyone didn't notice that. 00:28:52.86\00:28:54.20 Yeah. Just flat didn't know. 00:28:54.23\00:28:55.76 So I can't think of a better illustration 00:28:55.80\00:28:57.90 of how far we've come. 00:28:57.93\00:29:00.30 We're-- you know that doesn't compute anymore. 00:29:00.34\00:29:02.67 Yes, yes. 00:29:02.70\00:29:04.04 So when we talk about the protest 00:29:04.07\00:29:07.01 and people stand up and say the protest is over, 00:29:07.04\00:29:09.54 that kind of mind set is embraced 00:29:09.58\00:29:11.98 because you simply have nothing else-- 00:29:12.01\00:29:13.35 Well, the illusion you are making, 00:29:13.38\00:29:15.25 I don't know if it's been discussed 00:29:15.28\00:29:16.62 on any of your programs but a couple of years ago 00:29:16.65\00:29:20.26 an Episcopal priest named Tony Palmer 00:29:20.29\00:29:22.86 stood up before an evangelical group 00:29:22.89\00:29:26.63 of Kenneth Copeland's leadership conference. 00:29:26.66\00:29:29.46 And he said, "The reformation's over, 00:29:29.50\00:29:32.67 you're all Roman Catholics now." 00:29:32.70\00:29:34.14 Well, you know it's not quite true 00:29:34.17\00:29:35.90 but that's the inference 00:29:35.94\00:29:37.77 and the basis for that was a 1999 agreement 00:29:37.81\00:29:41.41 between the World Lutheran Federation 00:29:41.44\00:29:44.38 and the Roman Catholics, 00:29:44.41\00:29:46.72 where they decided Luther's differences 00:29:46.75\00:29:49.65 on righteousness by faith were a misunderstanding. 00:29:49.68\00:29:52.29 And the Catholic Church has not changed because-- 00:29:52.32\00:29:54.82 I read that agreement. 00:29:54.86\00:29:56.19 They said in entering into this agreement, 00:29:56.22\00:29:58.09 they by no means were repudiating 00:29:58.13\00:30:00.53 the Council of Trent which condemned the Lutheran 00:30:00.56\00:30:02.93 and the Protestant Reformation. 00:30:02.96\00:30:05.73 They said, but, in discussion, we realize that Lutherans today 00:30:05.77\00:30:09.67 hold something much more amenable to Catholic doctrine. 00:30:09.70\00:30:14.44 So we can decide that it's over. 00:30:14.48\00:30:17.75 And then the Methodist in 2008 made a similar agreement-- 00:30:17.78\00:30:22.15 or accepted that agreement. 00:30:22.18\00:30:24.02 So Protestantism is being rolled back, 00:30:24.05\00:30:26.86 not just in popular sensibility but in structural alignment. 00:30:26.89\00:30:30.79 Yeah. It's been decided it's over. 00:30:30.83\00:30:32.59 So when Tony Palmer can say that you're all Catholics now. 00:30:32.63\00:30:36.87 The reformation's over. 00:30:36.90\00:30:38.50 Even allowing for hyperbole, he had some basis in that. 00:30:38.53\00:30:41.17 Yes, yes. 00:30:41.20\00:30:42.54 Now what's interesting, Lincoln, is that 00:30:42.57\00:30:44.44 if you look at the beast that has changed its stripes, 00:30:44.47\00:30:48.61 it's more Protestantism than the Catholic Church. 00:30:48.64\00:30:50.55 This Pope had said... 00:30:50.58\00:30:51.91 And you and I know Ellen White 00:30:51.95\00:30:53.28 speaking to Seventh-day Adventist, 00:30:53.31\00:30:54.65 this would happen. 00:30:54.68\00:30:56.02 She says, "Rome will cover with apologies, 00:30:56.05\00:30:57.49 all their errors but she is unchanged." 00:30:57.52\00:30:59.89 And I don't think that's a malicious statement. 00:30:59.92\00:31:04.63 I read these papal documents. 00:31:04.66\00:31:06.13 They claim themselves that they are not changing 00:31:06.16\00:31:08.10 in the magisterium and the long term purposes 00:31:08.13\00:31:12.57 and they make a point in all these documents 00:31:12.60\00:31:14.67 which ever Pope it is, 00:31:14.70\00:31:16.04 he alludes to previous papal statements. 00:31:16.07\00:31:17.67 They are trying to show 00:31:17.71\00:31:19.04 the continuum of authority and thought. 00:31:19.07\00:31:21.38 And what I felt was interesting 00:31:21.41\00:31:22.74 and I did not hear this statement myself 00:31:22.78\00:31:24.31 but I heard one of the reporters 00:31:24.35\00:31:25.68 who was on the plane saying 00:31:25.71\00:31:27.15 we'd some of the bad food this kind of thing. 00:31:27.18\00:31:29.32 He said when we went back and sat and talked with him, 00:31:29.35\00:31:32.49 he made it clear the Pope did, "I'm not a reformer. 00:31:32.52\00:31:36.32 You guys are painting me as this, left this guy who is hear 00:31:36.36\00:31:40.23 to tear down all that went before. 00:31:40.26\00:31:43.20 That's not me. That's not my job. 00:31:43.23\00:31:45.27 And you shouldn't paint me as such. 00:31:45.30\00:31:46.74 I'm not hear to change anything. 00:31:46.77\00:31:49.67 I'm here to reaffirm. 00:31:49.70\00:31:51.27 Now my style is different but I'm not here to rip down 00:31:51.31\00:31:55.08 2000 years of history. 00:31:55.11\00:31:56.44 I'm here to follow in the trajectory-- 00:31:56.48\00:31:57.81 What he is doing in the Friday before the Pope's speech 00:31:57.85\00:32:02.52 before Congress, I'd attended an all day seminar 00:32:02.55\00:32:04.79 at Catholic University 00:32:04.82\00:32:07.06 and they were some interesting speeches there. 00:32:07.09\00:32:09.09 And one from Archbishop Lori of the Archbishop of Baltimore, 00:32:09.12\00:32:14.20 he told they are a little bit 00:32:14.23\00:32:15.56 about the Pope say if it's a "reform." 00:32:15.60\00:32:16.93 They used the term but what they really mean 00:32:16.97\00:32:18.50 is structural realignment within the church. 00:32:18.53\00:32:20.74 Yes. 00:32:20.77\00:32:22.10 They are changing a lot of things 00:32:22.14\00:32:23.47 to be more focused on their agenda. 00:32:23.51\00:32:26.57 And he actually told us a story 00:32:26.61\00:32:28.51 that that I found a little troubling. 00:32:28.54\00:32:31.45 The person that the Pope had set in place 00:32:31.48\00:32:35.95 as appoint man for reform, 00:32:35.98\00:32:39.75 come under great attack as they expected. 00:32:39.79\00:32:42.69 And then at the key point, 00:32:42.72\00:32:44.56 a charge was brought against this man, 00:32:44.59\00:32:47.46 this priest that he was traveling with the male lover. 00:32:47.50\00:32:52.27 And the Archbishop Lori said that such is his commitment 00:32:52.30\00:32:56.94 to reform that he refused to call for his resignation. 00:32:56.97\00:33:02.24 And it was in response to a question 00:33:02.28\00:33:04.08 about this situation on the plane 00:33:04.11\00:33:05.95 where the Pope said, "Who am I to judge?" 00:33:05.98\00:33:08.68 And then made some more general statements 00:33:08.72\00:33:10.49 about homosexuality. 00:33:10.52\00:33:12.05 Well, that's admirable 00:33:12.09\00:33:13.42 that he's going to pursue his agenda. 00:33:13.46\00:33:15.12 But it's a little problematic, morally ambiguous. 00:33:15.16\00:33:19.03 They wouldn't root out something 00:33:19.06\00:33:21.90 on its own moral case. 00:33:21.93\00:33:24.93 But it's more important to pursue this realignment 00:33:24.97\00:33:27.67 because the realignment, I think is everything to do 00:33:27.70\00:33:30.41 with his advancing, the case of Rome against old comers, 00:33:30.44\00:33:35.71 particularly, Protestants. 00:33:35.74\00:33:37.85 So it's a restructuring to fortify ourselves 00:33:37.88\00:33:41.62 for what we see as coming as opposed 00:33:41.65\00:33:43.79 to a sociological change or even a theological change 00:33:43.82\00:33:47.09 and where we're going and what we're trying to do. 00:33:47.12\00:33:50.06 On the speech, they were couple of other things 00:33:50.09\00:33:53.09 that I alluded to earlier that I need to at least 00:33:53.13\00:33:55.86 before people or viewers are forgotten. 00:33:55.90\00:33:58.50 Over and over again, the Pope used to term 00:33:58.53\00:34:00.57 that now is broadly used but I know 00:34:00.60\00:34:02.87 it really started in a religious context, 00:34:02.90\00:34:05.31 the common good. 00:34:05.34\00:34:07.44 And that chills my heart more than anything. 00:34:07.48\00:34:10.75 That one kind of just makes you squirm 00:34:10.78\00:34:12.31 in your seat a little bit. 00:34:12.35\00:34:13.68 You know, in the Bible the Pharisees 00:34:13.72\00:34:17.45 or the Sanhedrin said that it is better 00:34:17.49\00:34:19.52 that one man die than the nation should perish. 00:34:19.55\00:34:22.46 Precisely. 00:34:22.49\00:34:23.83 That's what the common good translation do. 00:34:23.86\00:34:25.99 It sounds all Kumbaya and you know, campfireish. 00:34:26.03\00:34:31.50 Yeah. 00:34:31.53\00:34:32.87 You know, we're gonna defend 00:34:32.90\00:34:34.54 against the wolves out there for the common good 00:34:34.57\00:34:36.50 we'll all do something together. 00:34:36.54\00:34:38.21 But you know, it has echoes in my view of communism 00:34:38.24\00:34:41.48 to start with in anti-communist America. 00:34:41.51\00:34:46.18 I'm surprised that that doesn't bother more people. 00:34:46.21\00:34:49.68 As the Pope expressed 00:34:49.72\00:34:51.05 that the common good for our survival means, 00:34:51.09\00:34:52.92 as he said later, that we be weary, 00:34:52.95\00:34:55.59 he didn't say what we do with them. 00:34:55.62\00:34:57.29 But we avoid and be weary of extremists 00:34:57.33\00:35:01.56 and fundamentalists. 00:35:01.60\00:35:03.70 Well, how do define an extremist? 00:35:03.73\00:35:07.50 An extremist in our own church 00:35:07.54\00:35:10.41 might be someone who talks too much 00:35:10.44\00:35:11.81 about religion for my nominal taste 00:35:11.84\00:35:14.61 and I'm offended by it. 00:35:14.64\00:35:15.98 Yes. 00:35:16.01\00:35:17.35 An extremist might be somebody who has decided 00:35:17.38\00:35:19.68 to dedicate their life to their religious faith, 00:35:19.71\00:35:22.38 you know, and Jesus said, 00:35:22.42\00:35:24.52 "whoever isn't willing to give up 00:35:24.55\00:35:27.12 father, mother, brother, sister for me is not worthy of me." 00:35:27.16\00:35:28.99 That's extremism. We know what lies behind. 00:35:29.02\00:35:33.36 That is someone who is willing to fly a plane 00:35:33.40\00:35:35.10 into a building or blow themselves up to kill someone. 00:35:35.13\00:35:37.37 But they are not the only extremists. 00:35:37.40\00:35:39.43 And I don't even think that's truly an extremist 00:35:39.47\00:35:43.51 in the normal religious sense. 00:35:43.54\00:35:45.37 But here, they've got us weary of extremists, 00:35:45.41\00:35:48.31 fundamentalists. 00:35:48.34\00:35:49.71 I've got to be fundamental about my faith 00:35:49.74\00:35:51.65 or I'm just a nominalist. 00:35:51.68\00:35:53.01 Yeah. Yeah. 00:35:53.05\00:35:54.62 So all of that which translates into anyone that thinks 00:35:54.65\00:35:57.95 other than what we say is here in the center. 00:35:57.99\00:36:01.36 I'm right with you and that's what I'm thinking. 00:36:01.39\00:36:02.96 Anybody other than that is dangerous. 00:36:02.99\00:36:04.89 Yeah, look under the rock and that's what you see. 00:36:04.93\00:36:06.26 They will undermine the common good. 00:36:06.29\00:36:07.96 Yes, yes. 00:36:08.00\00:36:09.33 And you don't have to even look at the Roman Catholic Church 00:36:09.36\00:36:11.43 or Christianity. 00:36:11.47\00:36:12.80 This model has being worked out many times 00:36:12.83\00:36:15.80 through the course of history, many times in the 20th 00:36:15.84\00:36:18.51 and now the 21st centuries. 00:36:18.54\00:36:19.94 Yeah. That's dangerous. 00:36:19.97\00:36:21.88 It is. 00:36:21.91\00:36:23.24 Dangerous for the individual, 00:36:23.28\00:36:24.61 dangerous for someone out of the norm. 00:36:24.65\00:36:26.31 Yeah, because if you want to marginalize a person, 00:36:26.35\00:36:28.92 the first thing you do is divide between us versus them. 00:36:28.95\00:36:32.42 We got us and then you got them. 00:36:32.45\00:36:34.42 And so if we all say it's good and that one group 00:36:34.46\00:36:38.19 where it says it is not, then it's us versus them. 00:36:38.23\00:36:41.46 They are extreme, they're out of step. 00:36:41.50\00:36:44.10 And that's what we see on the prophetic landscape-- 00:36:44.13\00:36:46.67 is going to happen. 00:36:46.70\00:36:48.67 For a grasping of hands, for a meeting of the minds 00:36:48.70\00:36:53.27 between Protestantism and Catholicism, 00:36:53.31\00:36:55.94 somebody's got to swallow a lot of doctrinal difference. 00:36:55.98\00:36:58.31 Somebody got to say, I believe this, 00:36:58.35\00:37:00.72 I believe this, I believe this. 00:37:00.75\00:37:02.08 No, forget it, you know, let's just sing together 00:37:02.12\00:37:04.92 come together and sing Kumbaya. 00:37:04.95\00:37:06.29 I said this once on this program a few years ago 00:37:06.32\00:37:08.39 but it's a good time to repeat this. 00:37:08.42\00:37:10.23 When I was in Australia back in the 70s, 00:37:10.26\00:37:14.20 several churches united. 00:37:14.23\00:37:15.76 They call themselves the Uniting Church. 00:37:15.80\00:37:17.33 But they were all Protestant churches 00:37:17.37\00:37:19.27 and gave away their individual identity 00:37:19.30\00:37:21.44 and formed a new church as a build up 00:37:21.47\00:37:24.04 to that many international church leaders came in. 00:37:24.07\00:37:26.94 And I remember that then Archbishop of Canterbury came 00:37:26.98\00:37:29.18 and they're all pitching the idea 00:37:29.21\00:37:31.15 that we need to be one common Christian faith. 00:37:31.18\00:37:34.75 It was an incredible synchronistic approach. 00:37:34.78\00:37:37.29 They re-wrote history. 00:37:37.32\00:37:38.72 They had history programs on TV 00:37:38.75\00:37:40.49 that told the Protestants split more from a political 00:37:40.52\00:37:45.26 rather than a doctrinal view point. 00:37:45.29\00:37:48.10 And then there was an interview that I will never forget 00:37:48.13\00:37:50.17 with the Archbishop and he said to the interviewer. 00:37:50.20\00:37:55.20 He says, "You know, we need to unite." 00:37:55.24\00:37:58.11 And he says, "Unity," 00:37:58.14\00:37:59.54 he says, "takes place on a pretty basic level. 00:37:59.57\00:38:01.68 Theologians, 00:38:01.71\00:38:03.04 they argue about these things endlessly," he said. 00:38:03.08\00:38:05.01 But it happens 00:38:05.05\00:38:06.38 when one church meets with another for afternoon tea 00:38:06.41\00:38:08.65 and they just socialize together." 00:38:08.68\00:38:10.29 So he says, "Join with us." 00:38:10.32\00:38:12.15 He says, "We can work out 00:38:12.19\00:38:13.52 the doctrinal differences later." 00:38:13.56\00:38:16.02 And the interviewer to his credit said, 00:38:16.06\00:38:17.76 "But what about if after this union 00:38:17.79\00:38:21.86 can't resolve the doctrinal differences?" 00:38:21.90\00:38:24.53 And I'll never forget it. 00:38:24.57\00:38:25.90 His eyes narrowed and he says, "Well, then," he says, 00:38:25.93\00:38:28.10 "it's like a diseased part of the body. 00:38:28.14\00:38:29.97 It must be cut out and destroyed." 00:38:30.01\00:38:33.38 And I hope he was speaking allegorically 00:38:33.41\00:38:35.51 or metaphorically. 00:38:35.54\00:38:37.51 But how do you destroy? I fear not. 00:38:37.55\00:38:39.88 A political, a religious opposition. 00:38:39.91\00:38:43.12 We know in the era of the inquisition 00:38:43.15\00:38:45.95 and the reformation period, 00:38:45.99\00:38:49.36 you lead to personal persecution or religious wars. 00:38:49.39\00:38:52.53 Yeah, yeah. And that's the thing. 00:38:52.56\00:38:55.06 If you feel God is with you and God is on your side, 00:38:55.10\00:38:58.03 then any persecution carried forward is done so 00:38:58.07\00:39:00.24 in the name of God. 00:39:00.27\00:39:01.67 And is there by justified. So if it's disease, amputate. 00:39:01.70\00:39:06.57 And of course, when you, 00:39:06.61\00:39:07.94 if you are on the amputate side, 00:39:07.98\00:39:09.41 you are kind of in trouble but that's been the history 00:39:09.44\00:39:11.78 of the church when it's has had the ability to do so. 00:39:11.81\00:39:14.48 Right. And that's a key thing. Yeah. 00:39:14.52\00:39:15.85 Now we know that neither the religious right 00:39:15.88\00:39:19.89 as a political movement in the US, 00:39:19.92\00:39:21.36 nor the Pope of Rome 00:39:21.39\00:39:22.96 representing a political initiative from his church, 00:39:22.99\00:39:25.73 they don't have absolute power to snap the fingers 00:39:25.76\00:39:29.00 and cause their enemies to disappear. 00:39:29.03\00:39:30.77 If they did they'd be more disappearances. 00:39:30.80\00:39:34.27 Because there's many statements on the whole religious front 00:39:34.30\00:39:37.61 and, of course, Islam is the same at the moment. 00:39:37.64\00:39:39.57 There's many statements that are quite chilling. 00:39:39.61\00:39:42.98 So we need not give political power 00:39:43.01\00:39:45.71 to these religious agendas. 00:39:45.75\00:39:47.08 Yes, yes. 00:39:47.12\00:39:48.45 Something else that I wanted to talk about on the speech. 00:39:48.48\00:39:50.72 He used the term subsidiarity. 00:39:50.75\00:39:54.59 And we've had article in Liberty Magazine on this. 00:39:54.62\00:39:57.59 And this has been stated a lot by the Catholic Church. 00:39:57.63\00:40:02.86 There's a great irony here that now on religious liberty, 00:40:02.90\00:40:06.67 Protestants, so called religious right 00:40:06.70\00:40:10.44 or exhibit a talk religious liberty 00:40:10.47\00:40:13.98 but what they're really talking about more and more 00:40:14.01\00:40:16.81 is religious entitlement. 00:40:16.85\00:40:18.45 Uh, huh. Yes. 00:40:18.48\00:40:19.81 And that's part of religious liberty 00:40:19.85\00:40:21.48 but taken to a sense degree it's this clerk in... 00:40:21.52\00:40:27.16 In Kentucky? In Kentucky. 00:40:27.19\00:40:29.46 Because of her objection to gay marriage, 00:40:29.49\00:40:31.79 she's gonna stop it. 00:40:31.83\00:40:33.73 It isn't that she won't participate. 00:40:33.76\00:40:37.23 Her faith is against this. 00:40:37.27\00:40:38.60 So I'm entitled now to stop all of you. 00:40:38.63\00:40:42.54 That's more of the religious entitlement view. 00:40:42.57\00:40:44.81 The Catholic Church ironically have emerged 00:40:47.98\00:40:50.75 with that back drop and mostly Protestant groups, 00:40:50.78\00:40:53.45 they've emerged as a champion of religious liberty. 00:40:53.48\00:40:56.22 And I don't think it's all manufactured, 00:40:56.25\00:40:59.19 because of Vatican II, there was a new openness 00:40:59.22\00:41:01.52 that came into the Roman Catholic thinking 00:41:01.56\00:41:04.23 and the document there was the center of it 00:41:04.26\00:41:07.70 called Dignitatis humanae, the dignity of man, 00:41:07.73\00:41:10.10 says that you can change your religion 00:41:10.13\00:41:11.93 and whatever you settle on has dignity. 00:41:11.97\00:41:16.91 So the Roman Catholic Church 00:41:16.94\00:41:18.27 are a champion of religious liberty. 00:41:18.31\00:41:19.77 But they have explained a caveat, 00:41:19.81\00:41:22.98 and it's this term subsidiarity. 00:41:23.01\00:41:25.38 They say the church and state should be separate. 00:41:25.41\00:41:28.88 They say this in the United States. 00:41:28.92\00:41:30.25 I'm not sure they it in Europe. 00:41:30.29\00:41:32.02 The church and state should be separate 00:41:32.05\00:41:34.02 as the constitution mandates. 00:41:34.06\00:41:35.69 But the state is subsidiary to the church. 00:41:35.72\00:41:41.73 What is subsidiary mean? 00:41:41.76\00:41:43.10 That it's inferior or it's lower authority 00:41:43.13\00:41:45.60 which tells me 00:41:45.63\00:41:46.97 that the separation of church and state, 00:41:47.00\00:41:48.34 one is higher than the other. 00:41:48.37\00:41:49.70 But when necessity applies, 00:41:49.74\00:41:52.51 the church can assert that superiority. 00:41:52.54\00:41:56.61 And in the speech the Pope said it in a very curious 00:41:56.64\00:41:59.95 little turn of phrase that I've never heard before. 00:41:59.98\00:42:02.92 He said, he called for reciprocal subsidiarity. 00:42:02.95\00:42:09.12 Now how does one do that? 00:42:09.16\00:42:10.66 Well, I, you know, I'm looking of thoughts 00:42:10.69\00:42:12.53 into the mind of someone who didn't spell that clearly. 00:42:12.56\00:42:15.56 But I'm positive 00:42:15.60\00:42:17.53 that it means an assertion of this inherent right. 00:42:17.57\00:42:21.70 Under the subsidiarity principle. 00:42:21.74\00:42:24.11 What I think it means is on religious issues, 00:42:24.14\00:42:28.51 the church needs to intervene in the state. 00:42:28.54\00:42:31.45 Right. 00:42:31.48\00:42:32.81 And a bit of a two way dialogue, 00:42:32.85\00:42:34.62 the civil and religious affairs made 00:42:34.65\00:42:37.19 might be reciprocally dealt with 00:42:37.22\00:42:39.32 between the Church of Rome and the state. 00:42:39.35\00:42:42.32 And that's medieval. It is medieval. 00:42:42.36\00:42:44.99 And because if you massage the issue enough, 00:42:45.03\00:42:48.30 every issue will become moral. 00:42:48.33\00:42:50.07 You know, if you twist it and turn it enough, 00:42:50.10\00:42:53.34 paint it the right way, spin it enough, you can turn, 00:42:53.37\00:42:56.27 you can turn working seven days a week taking one day off 00:42:56.30\00:42:59.94 for your own good, that's moral. 00:42:59.97\00:43:02.08 The destruction of the earth, that's moral. 00:43:02.11\00:43:04.71 Any issue really sooner or later, 00:43:04.75\00:43:07.28 the church can say that's our purview. 00:43:07.32\00:43:09.08 That's not yours, that's ours. 00:43:09.12\00:43:10.45 Yeah. Yeah. 00:43:10.49\00:43:11.82 Including how men treat men, men treat women, 00:43:11.85\00:43:13.96 men treat the earth, you know, anything sooner or later. 00:43:13.99\00:43:16.62 So what you end up with is a church 00:43:16.66\00:43:18.59 that is still a little higher than the state 00:43:18.63\00:43:20.93 and can sort of bully the state around 00:43:20.96\00:43:22.76 when it has a moral issue. 00:43:22.80\00:43:24.13 Now they were interesting themes of work there 00:43:24.17\00:43:26.03 and I think most people recognize, 00:43:26.07\00:43:28.44 even though very few have read 00:43:28.47\00:43:30.67 the encyclical on the environment. 00:43:30.71\00:43:32.81 They could tell that his speech was resonating 00:43:32.84\00:43:35.88 with some of those same themes that were expressed there. 00:43:35.91\00:43:39.21 What troubles me as a Seventh-day Adventist 00:43:39.25\00:43:42.98 as someone that sees prophecy, 00:43:43.02\00:43:44.62 particularly, about that encyclical. 00:43:44.65\00:43:47.46 It's not the call for the environmental concern. 00:43:47.49\00:43:50.43 Seventh-day Adventist should have that. 00:43:50.46\00:43:52.56 You know, the First Angel's message 00:43:52.59\00:43:54.20 of the Three Angels' messages of Revelation 14, it says, 00:43:54.23\00:43:58.77 "Fear God and give glory to Him that created heaven and earth 00:43:58.80\00:44:04.31 because the hour of His judgment has come." 00:44:04.34\00:44:07.64 So it's an immediate proclamation 00:44:07.68\00:44:10.21 of the creator God. 00:44:10.25\00:44:11.58 If you would have fear and honor Him, 00:44:11.61\00:44:13.42 His judgment is coming. 00:44:13.45\00:44:14.78 Judgment partly comes 00:44:14.82\00:44:16.15 because we've been poor custodians of the earth's. 00:44:16.18\00:44:17.99 In God's word, it says, 00:44:18.02\00:44:19.35 "God is coming to destroy those who destroy the earth." 00:44:19.39\00:44:21.86 Very true. 00:44:21.89\00:44:23.22 So that's an absolutely Biblical concept 00:44:23.26\00:44:24.93 that the Pope has seized upon. 00:44:24.96\00:44:26.66 And I would hope that Seventh-day Adventist 00:44:26.70\00:44:29.06 and anybody that honors their Lord 00:44:29.10\00:44:31.40 would be a very good custodian of the environment. 00:44:31.43\00:44:34.54 There's nothing wrong with that at all. 00:44:34.57\00:44:36.60 In the document though, and as I look at it, 00:44:36.64\00:44:41.01 which is a secular concern, even though it derives 00:44:41.04\00:44:43.68 from the theology of the creator God. 00:44:43.71\00:44:46.08 But he is putting this out as a civil solution 00:44:46.11\00:44:50.89 to a world wide problem. 00:44:50.92\00:44:53.22 In the document it says this, gives the example. 00:44:53.25\00:44:56.86 And I have noticed that the Pope began by looking up 00:44:56.89\00:44:59.69 and seeing the by relief of Moses there in the capital. 00:44:59.73\00:45:04.53 So he mentioned Moses, the law giver, 00:45:04.57\00:45:06.63 the divine law, right. 00:45:06.67\00:45:08.20 And in the encyclical he says, 00:45:08.24\00:45:11.61 refers to the fact that the Jewish people, 00:45:11.64\00:45:14.84 Israel in the Old Testament kept the seventh day Sabbath 00:45:14.88\00:45:19.38 as a memorial of creation 00:45:19.41\00:45:21.55 and as a reminder of their custody of the environment. 00:45:21.58\00:45:25.19 And he says, and we too in keeping Sunday, 00:45:25.22\00:45:29.62 a non-Biblical day by the way, keeping Sunday, 00:45:29.66\00:45:33.43 we do it as a memorial of God's new creation, 00:45:33.46\00:45:36.10 the resurrection, that's fine. 00:45:36.13\00:45:38.73 There's no logic on that. 00:45:38.77\00:45:40.10 It does away with the seventh day Sabbath. 00:45:40.14\00:45:41.94 It says in keeping this Sunday, we keep it too as a reminder 00:45:41.97\00:45:47.08 of our custody of the environment. 00:45:47.11\00:45:48.78 So he has inserted 00:45:48.81\00:45:50.61 a very distinct religious view point, 00:45:50.65\00:45:53.85 in fact, the difference between Protestants, one of the-- 00:45:53.88\00:45:56.05 well, it's not difference 00:45:56.08\00:45:57.42 between Protestants and Catholics 00:45:57.45\00:45:58.79 but at root there's a difference 00:45:58.82\00:46:00.16 because the Sunday, you can read anywhere 00:46:00.19\00:46:03.53 Rome claims that they had the authority. 00:46:03.56\00:46:05.59 Yes. To change it. 00:46:05.63\00:46:07.36 So here is a point of dispute of religious people 00:46:07.40\00:46:11.87 and it's put out as part of the dictum 00:46:11.90\00:46:14.87 for solving the environment for all peoples. 00:46:14.90\00:46:17.41 And in Liberty Magazine, where I have to be very careful 00:46:17.44\00:46:19.71 because it's not a commentary on some one else's faith, 00:46:19.74\00:46:22.74 but I said that we would support this document 00:46:22.78\00:46:25.75 on the environment, you know, we should applaud it, 00:46:25.78\00:46:28.62 except where it has its most partisan. 00:46:28.65\00:46:33.29 And this is a partisan proclamation. 00:46:33.32\00:46:36.49 Very much so, very much so. 00:46:36.52\00:46:38.43 Was there anything else, 00:46:38.46\00:46:39.79 because the time is just slipping away from us, 00:46:39.83\00:46:41.16 in his speech that gave you pause or alarm. 00:46:41.20\00:46:44.47 Well, I've gone to those things. 00:46:44.50\00:46:47.30 What gives me alarm is the mere fact 00:46:47.34\00:46:50.01 that he was speaking to congress. 00:46:50.04\00:46:51.77 You know, we know procedurally 00:46:51.81\00:46:53.54 how he came to be speaking there, 00:46:53.58\00:46:55.14 of course, the prestige in Protestant America 00:46:55.18\00:46:57.98 of the papacy is been rising, not just for this Pope, 00:46:58.01\00:47:00.72 his predecessor Benedict, when he came, 00:47:00.75\00:47:03.92 the President Bush met him at the airport. 00:47:03.95\00:47:06.59 Never done with heads of state, but he met right at the airport 00:47:06.62\00:47:10.36 and he said, he looked into his eyes and he saw God. 00:47:10.39\00:47:13.36 I mean, it's a pretty high bar. Yes. 00:47:13.40\00:47:16.87 And so this present Pope comes again as a conquering hero. 00:47:16.90\00:47:21.70 But that said, no religious leader 00:47:21.74\00:47:24.24 had ever before has spoken 00:47:24.27\00:47:26.24 before the joint session of Congress. 00:47:26.27\00:47:29.14 It's just without precedent. 00:47:29.18\00:47:31.21 Some significant figures had in the past, Rafael, 00:47:31.25\00:47:35.02 has spoken there shortly after the republic was formed, 00:47:35.05\00:47:37.75 but of course, he was the conquering hero. 00:47:37.79\00:47:39.19 Yes. 00:47:39.22\00:47:41.26 Few months ago now, Netanyahu spoke there. 00:47:41.29\00:47:44.13 And I think, they still ruffle feathers after that. 00:47:44.16\00:47:48.76 That was a very inappropriate speech on many levels. 00:47:48.80\00:47:51.10 Yes. 00:47:51.13\00:47:52.47 But it should have been seen as highly inappropriate 00:47:52.50\00:47:54.90 for any religious leader, least of all, 00:47:54.94\00:47:58.21 the Pope of Rome to come to this Protestant society, 00:47:58.24\00:48:02.64 not a Protestant government, 00:48:02.68\00:48:05.01 but a secular government and speak. 00:48:05.05\00:48:07.28 But it happened because the majority leader, Boehner 00:48:07.32\00:48:11.95 and the minority leader Nancy Pelosi, 00:48:11.99\00:48:14.19 both Roman Catholics. 00:48:14.22\00:48:15.56 Yes. Very comfortable for them. 00:48:15.59\00:48:18.59 I don't know the full story, it may never be known 00:48:18.63\00:48:20.83 but it made sense to me that Boehner resigned the day after. 00:48:20.86\00:48:26.57 I think there some noise behind the scenes 00:48:26.60\00:48:28.50 because they went out on a big limb to do this. 00:48:28.54\00:48:32.34 So the... 00:48:32.37\00:48:35.84 the affright or the affront that we should take, 00:48:35.88\00:48:38.11 I think it's just that this happened, period. 00:48:38.15\00:48:40.08 He didn't have to say anything so significant 00:48:40.12\00:48:44.02 for it to be historic and troubling. 00:48:44.05\00:48:47.56 Yeah, there were several who said, 00:48:47.59\00:48:49.02 okay, this Pope is too political. 00:48:49.06\00:48:51.46 Well, the fact that you are here talking to this body 00:48:51.49\00:48:54.20 is a political statement in and of itself 00:48:54.23\00:48:56.33 regardless of what you are commentary is or your-- 00:48:56.36\00:48:59.67 Some Seventh-day Adventists of more paranoid sort, 00:48:59.70\00:49:04.24 were saying unless he recommended 00:49:04.27\00:49:07.04 an immediate Sunday law with a force of-- 00:49:07.08\00:49:10.11 full force of law, 00:49:10.15\00:49:11.48 then it wasn't anything to remark on. 00:49:11.51\00:49:12.85 Yeah. Well, this-- 00:49:12.88\00:49:14.22 They're missing point of this. Right, precisely. Yeah. 00:49:14.25\00:49:16.42 If he had done so, it still wouldn't have been enacted. 00:49:16.45\00:49:19.25 At this particular moment in time, 00:49:19.29\00:49:21.56 they're enough people who value liberty in general, 00:49:21.59\00:49:24.99 not just the separation of the church and state. 00:49:25.03\00:49:26.63 That wouldn't fly. Right. 00:49:26.66\00:49:28.80 But the ground has been laid, 00:49:28.83\00:49:31.50 the amnesia is sufficient that we discussed earlier. 00:49:31.53\00:49:35.00 Well said. Yeah. When the crisis comes. 00:49:35.04\00:49:37.51 I believe there's a very good chance 00:49:37.54\00:49:39.11 that it will appear because it's been noised abroad 00:49:39.14\00:49:41.88 by this Pope in Europe and even in another fora 00:49:41.91\00:49:45.01 here in the United States, the institute of the family 00:49:45.05\00:49:47.65 met same time he was here. 00:49:47.68\00:49:49.82 And they have been calling very strongly 00:49:49.85\00:49:51.85 for the family rest day, which happens to be Sunday. 00:49:51.89\00:49:55.26 And it's a pseudo civil day. Yes. 00:49:55.29\00:49:58.36 Saves money like day light saving, 00:49:58.39\00:50:00.13 it allows the community to rejuvenate itself, 00:50:00.16\00:50:04.07 to have environmental concerns and also, not coincidentally, 00:50:04.10\00:50:09.37 go to church and have spiritual rituals. 00:50:09.40\00:50:11.67 And it seems very reasonable, you know, we were, 00:50:11.71\00:50:14.74 it's very reasonable. 00:50:14.78\00:50:16.11 Yeah. Yes. It's not offensive in itself. 00:50:16.14\00:50:18.71 But it clearly is a camel's nose 00:50:18.75\00:50:21.95 into the flap of a bigger tent. 00:50:21.98\00:50:24.99 Very true, very true. 00:50:25.02\00:50:26.65 Changing gears just a little bit, Lincoln. 00:50:26.69\00:50:28.32 How much do you think we are willing to surrender 00:50:28.36\00:50:31.76 individual rights and even our own Protestant identities 00:50:31.79\00:50:35.86 on the alter of world peace? 00:50:35.90\00:50:37.73 I mean, the thing that's driving world, 00:50:37.77\00:50:39.53 now we got ISIS, we got this, we got that, 00:50:39.57\00:50:41.20 we got this craziness. 00:50:41.24\00:50:43.04 If somebody can say, I got the answer to that, 00:50:43.07\00:50:45.51 I think I can pull off through this in together, 00:50:45.54\00:50:47.38 how much do you think we will lay down our arms 00:50:47.41\00:50:49.21 and just say, okay, lead me, I will follow you? 00:50:49.24\00:50:51.51 Well, you said, lay down your arms. 00:50:51.55\00:50:54.15 The one thing that Americans are not yet ready 00:50:54.18\00:50:57.72 to lay down, are their arms. 00:50:57.75\00:50:59.09 Yes, yes, very true. That is true. 00:50:59.12\00:51:02.12 I don't know about that battle but as afar as civil liberties 00:51:02.16\00:51:05.09 in general, it's been proven since 9/11. 00:51:05.13\00:51:07.56 We're willing as in the aggregate 00:51:07.60\00:51:10.70 to give away everything for security, everything. 00:51:10.73\00:51:13.10 And it's been said, 00:51:13.13\00:51:14.47 you know, people stood up shortly after 9/11. 00:51:14.50\00:51:16.91 I don't, someone said, "I don't care if President Bush 00:51:16.94\00:51:19.37 knows what I'm doing in my bathroom. 00:51:19.41\00:51:21.34 If I can be safe, I'll give away the freedoms." 00:51:21.38\00:51:24.45 And of course, there's the statement 00:51:24.48\00:51:25.81 from one of the founders of the US, 00:51:25.85\00:51:27.95 I think it was Benjamin Franklin, 00:51:27.98\00:51:29.32 "Those that are willing to give up 00:51:29.35\00:51:32.29 liberties for security, don't deserve security or liberty." 00:51:32.32\00:51:37.89 And when I said, I really meant in a metaphorical state, 00:51:37.93\00:51:42.10 those things that define me, 00:51:42.13\00:51:43.53 those things that I have taken for granted as mine by right, 00:51:43.57\00:51:46.70 I'm willing to surrender to you if you say 00:51:46.74\00:51:48.50 you can give me peace, I will give you this 00:51:48.54\00:51:50.71 because I want peace more than anything else. 00:51:50.74\00:51:52.34 I know many people including 00:51:52.37\00:51:54.68 at least, one or two presidential candidates 00:51:54.71\00:51:57.75 at the moment are touting American exceptionalism. 00:51:57.78\00:52:00.82 And they mean something 00:52:00.85\00:52:02.18 of a sort of a religious view on that. 00:52:02.22\00:52:04.22 But in reality America is not exceptional 00:52:04.25\00:52:07.59 on the level we're talking about here. 00:52:07.62\00:52:09.16 We're just made up of many human beings 00:52:09.19\00:52:10.86 that behave similarly under crisis and distressed 00:52:10.89\00:52:14.40 or other human beings either in other countries 00:52:14.43\00:52:16.93 or at other times. 00:52:16.97\00:52:18.37 And people have shown an incredible predilection 00:52:18.40\00:52:21.74 to giving way to a strong man who offers security 00:52:21.77\00:52:25.34 even as he takes away 00:52:25.37\00:52:27.08 thing that they might otherwise cherish. 00:52:27.11\00:52:28.54 Very true. 00:52:28.58\00:52:29.91 And the US is not an innotimmune 00:52:29.94\00:52:31.55 wherein in a rush to give away things 00:52:31.58\00:52:34.32 or to close their eyes and these happen. 00:52:34.35\00:52:39.12 You know, there's good evidence to think every phone call, 00:52:39.15\00:52:42.89 every communication, every electronic transaction 00:52:42.92\00:52:46.80 you has been monolized or studied to determine 00:52:46.83\00:52:50.33 whether you are a suitable person to deliver this country. 00:52:50.37\00:52:53.77 And that you went exactly where I was hoping you would. 00:52:53.80\00:52:56.71 Boy, this hour has gone so fast. 00:52:56.74\00:52:58.54 I want go put up now some contact information. 00:52:58.57\00:53:00.48 Should you like to make contact 00:53:00.51\00:53:01.84 with Liberty Magazine, with Lincoln Steed, 00:53:01.88\00:53:05.45 here's the information that you're gonna need. 00:53:05.48\00:53:07.05 If you'd like to know more about this ministry, 00:53:09.02\00:53:11.29 then you can write to Liberty Magazine 00:53:11.32\00:53:13.89 12501, Old Columbia Pike, Silver Spring, Maryland 20904. 00:53:13.92\00:53:20.50 That's Liberty Magazine 12501, Old Columbia Pike, 00:53:20.53\00:53:25.23 Silver Spring, Maryland 20904. 00:53:25.27\00:53:28.90 You can call (301) 680-6690. 00:53:28.94\00:53:33.27 That's (301) 680-6690. 00:53:33.31\00:53:37.45 You can also visit them on the web 00:53:37.48\00:53:39.45 at libertymagazine.org. 00:53:39.48\00:53:41.78 That's libertymagazine.org. 00:53:41.82\00:53:45.55 Contact them today. They'd love to hear from you. 00:53:45.59\00:53:48.42