Liberty Insider

Ed Cooke Part 3 of 6

Three Angels Broadcasting Network

Program transcript

Participants:

Home

Series Code: LI

Program Code: LI210499A


00:26 Welcome to the Liberty Insider.
00:27 This is your program
00:29 to bring you information and ideas
00:32 on religious liberty in the US and around the world.
00:35 My name is Lincoln Steed,
00:37 editor of Liberty Magazine for 22 years.
00:41 And my guest on this program is Ed Cooke,
00:43 a long time author of articles in Liberty Magazine,
00:47 a holder of a doctorate and church state studies
00:49 from Baylor University,
00:51 and a resident of Texas.
00:54 The eyes of Texas are upon you, if not none other.
00:58 Sure. I'm glad to be here.
01:00 An author, a researcher, a book reviewer,
01:04 and a pastor.
01:05 So let's talk about some heavy stuff.
01:09 You and I love history,
01:10 and I think in many contemporary issues,
01:15 you can't understand them fully without history.
01:17 And I think on religious liberty,
01:19 you have to understand history.
01:22 We're going through a difficult time in the West.
01:25 I think particularly starting with 9/11
01:28 when those in control
01:31 started rethinking basic civil liberties
01:34 and infamously a few people,
01:36 I remember hearing them on TV,
01:39 say, I don't care if the president knows,
01:40 you know, what I'm doing
01:42 in my bathroom or bedroom, whatever,
01:44 if it helps security, great.
01:46 So they were willing to give away liberties,
01:49 but that didn't happen yesterday.
01:52 And in many ways in our modern era,
01:56 the darkest possibilities of totalitarianism
02:01 can be seen in what happened in Germany
02:04 after World War I
02:07 and a whole series of catastrophes
02:09 that failed Germany, political, social, and some religious
02:14 ending up with the national socialists
02:16 or the Nazis.
02:18 And I know some people just go bananas
02:21 if there's any illusion made or worse comparison
02:25 between anything happening now
02:27 and in the Nazi era.
02:29 But unfortunately,
02:30 there's lessons to be learned and there are often parallels
02:34 that I think need to become an add-on.
02:36 And we can't just dodge it because it offends someone.
02:39 This was a horrible period, just a lifetime before us,
02:43 you know, I was born, maybe I'm dinosaur,
02:47 but, you know, I was born only a few years after the war.
02:50 I knew nothing of it,
02:51 but, you know, that's, that's a lifespan
02:54 and in the sweep of human history,
02:55 that's yesterday.
02:57 True.
02:58 You know, the atomic bomb was developed,
03:01 you know, right at the end of that war
03:04 and that shapes our world big time today,
03:07 or it should.
03:08 Yeah.
03:09 There's still discussions, you know,
03:11 about nuclear armaments and trying to reduce those
03:13 and the countries that still have weapons,
03:15 there's monitoring that goes on.
03:18 And, so, you know, we can't ignore Hiroshima
03:21 when you're talking about modern day disarmament
03:23 and no more when you're talking about
03:25 a loss of civil liberties
03:27 and religious restriction in different places,
03:29 or worse than religious restriction,
03:33 religious hijacking by a given order.
03:36 This is what happened in Germany, isn't it?
03:38 Yeah.
03:40 I was going to even going to say that
03:41 one may say that, okay, this happened way back
03:43 in what the 1940s over what, 70, 80 years ago.
03:47 And yet it's something
03:49 that still impacts the modern day,
03:51 because Germany has a law
03:53 against the displaying of the Nazi symbol.
03:56 It's against the law to do that.
03:58 However, in contrast, like here in America,
04:00 we have freedom of expression.
04:02 There's people that wear the symbol of Nazism,
04:05 you know, in America.
04:06 So...
04:07 I thought the parallel we get to make is
04:09 they display the rebel flag,
04:12 which I think is rude.
04:17 Whether it's illegal, that's another question.
04:19 Lot of discussion and debate about that
04:20 in our country, right?
04:22 I mean, tying back to the civil war
04:24 and the outcomes of that and so forth.
04:26 And yet people that should know better
04:27 would might defend that.
04:29 And yet they don't see the analogy
04:31 between flag desecration.
04:33 And I've mentioned on this program before,
04:35 it's a good time to repeat here.
04:36 I remember hearing Antonin Scalia once in person
04:39 talking about many things and he was quite provocative.
04:42 And he then said
04:44 how he found it personally distasteful
04:47 that some of the hippies
04:49 back in my youth were burning the flag.
04:51 But when he and his fellow justices got together,
04:54 they felt that it was within people's rights
04:56 to burn that flag.
04:58 And he said, he went home and his own wife attacked him.
05:00 How dare you make that decision order?
05:03 So we allowed flag desecration in the US
05:07 and I don't know all the laws on it,
05:10 but it seems to me it's not a jailable offense
05:12 to waive the flag of the Confederacy,
05:15 but yet that's a very inflammatory act.
05:19 And you're right, in Germany
05:21 they've decided it was such a horrible period,
05:24 legally exclude those things.
05:26 And why?
05:27 Because Germany went off the rails in every area
05:30 and on religion, most of all, I think.
05:33 True.
05:34 You know, Germany is when Martin Luther
05:37 arose the Reformation.
05:39 They were lightened by an illumination
05:42 of God's Word
05:45 and an understanding of righteous by faith,
05:48 not through works, you know, the Catholic Church
05:50 and all of the mechanisms of the Medieval Church.
05:53 So when one asks, or may ask you a question.
05:56 How did they go off trail?
05:59 Not only go off trail.
06:00 Religion led the way
06:02 in supporting this murderous regime, didn't they?
06:05 True.
06:07 Yeah, so when one looks at the history,
06:09 one would say kind of leading up
06:10 to the development of Nazism,
06:13 there were a variety of factors.
06:15 One, of course, I think we've talked,
06:17 you and I have talked about
06:18 a little bit before personally
06:20 dealing with the carryover from World War I.
06:24 One you may say
06:26 the unfairness or the injustice,
06:27 at least from the German perspective
06:30 of getting the short end of that deal,
06:32 financial aspects,
06:33 and then also the turmoil within the country,
06:37 because you had the presence of the Jewish faith,
06:40 Jewish believers there that individuals that were.
06:43 Here's another interesting point
06:45 from a philosophical perspective.
06:48 Nietzsche in back in the century prior
06:50 in the 1880s,
06:52 in some of his writings had written
06:54 what some people today interpret
06:56 and look at is being maybe anti-Semitic.
06:59 Whereas other people
07:00 that would defend Nietzsche as an author
07:02 would say that was not his intent.
07:03 I won't go into that debate, but nonetheless,
07:06 it's part of history that was there.
07:08 That one could say, maybe precipitated
07:10 some of the things that developed.
07:12 The history of anti-Semitism in Europe is very plain.
07:17 From the very beginning of Christianity,
07:20 the Jews were the other,
07:21 and their own words are not there.
07:24 I shouldn't say they,
07:25 Jewish words by the priests
07:27 and their supporters were used where they said,
07:29 you know, his blood be upon our head,
07:31 but I don't see
07:32 how that creates a corporate guilt.
07:34 And the Bible says those that pierced Him will be...
07:37 Will see. Will see Him in His glory.
07:39 It doesn't say the whole Jewish nation.
07:41 In fact, Paul says that they haven't been rejected.
07:44 He says, lest you be wise in your own conceits,
07:46 but it took root in medieval Christianity...
07:51 Through the pogroms, the Catholic Church pogrom.
07:54 Well, the Catholic Church created this idea.
07:57 These are the people rejected.
07:59 We are now the favored ones.
08:00 And then with Martin Luther,
08:02 that's when I think the modern troubles began.
08:06 He had his own cultural, personal biases
08:09 and he played those out big.
08:10 Some of the stuff that Martin Luther
08:12 wrote against the Jews,
08:14 you can't reconcile it with any Christian sensibility.
08:17 It was just him and his personal hatred.
08:20 And it's quite murderous.
08:22 It's not just like you say about Nietzsche,
08:24 perhaps you could say, well,
08:26 give me the benefit of the doubt.
08:28 You can't say that with Martin Luther,
08:29 it's very open.
08:32 So I think in the modern Protestant Lutheran era,
08:36 Martin Luther laid that groundwork.
08:37 And part of what was continued from the papal days
08:41 through Lutheranism,
08:43 the Jews were excluded from a lot of activities.
08:45 They were herded together in ghettos very often.
08:51 They were restricted in trays that they could carry on.
08:54 They were labeled with...
08:55 And ironically
08:59 you can in the Bible make a case
09:01 that we shouldn't take usury
09:04 and we shouldn't take financial advantage
09:06 of other people,
09:07 like in the Old Testament, even buying land,
09:10 it was supposed to be repatriated
09:12 after 50 years.
09:14 So the Jews were forced into this money making realm
09:19 to carry on what a good Christian
09:21 wouldn't do at that time.
09:24 So that's sort of took root
09:25 and as they became successful financially,
09:27 there was jealousy and so on.
09:30 So it all played out that by the time
09:32 the Nazis came along,
09:33 there was a ready suspicion of them,
09:37 even though I've read articles
09:41 that in the 20s and early years of the 20th century,
09:45 Germany was described as the most friendly
09:49 and suitable place
09:51 for the Jewish population to live in
09:53 the whole Western world.
09:56 But, once the Nazis played on that,
09:58 there was a ready field of distrust
10:01 of Jews and good Christians.
10:03 You know, another thing that one can say is
10:06 like we're talking about here, we're teasing out
10:09 different threads of not only religion,
10:11 philosophy, financial factors,
10:15 ethnic differences that culminated
10:18 one can say all of those threads came together
10:20 to make a final product, end product, right?
10:23 Being Nazi Germany and the final solution
10:26 as Hitler referred to it, the annihilation of the Jews.
10:30 But one of the other things that played into that
10:32 was along the scientific realm
10:34 where you looked at the aspect of Darwinism,
10:37 yes, correct social Darwinism, where...
10:40 I was hoping we would get to that.
10:42 Scientifically, where they said that there are differences
10:45 between races, and...
10:46 But we can't directly relate that to religion.
10:49 That was the social development,
10:50 which was most regrettable,
10:52 and pseudoscience was at play all around the world.
10:56 The US was lobotomizing, sterilizing.
10:59 It had its own miscegenation laws.
11:03 In fact, the Nazis modeled this after US
11:07 prohibitions on into marriage and so on.
11:09 So the prejudices of races around the world
11:13 had been encouraged by Darwinism
11:17 or Darwin's theory and eugenics.
11:21 I've got several eugenics books at home.
11:22 I was reading one the other day.
11:24 If you sort of suspend your critical faculties,
11:27 it all makes sense and sounds very harmless.
11:30 The idea which we know
11:31 is still a factor in any society,
11:34 and the US is seeing it,
11:35 this declining birth rates among the educated
11:38 and those less educated and less self-sufficient
11:44 have many more children.
11:45 They become a burden to society.
11:47 And then they're less likely to be educated.
11:49 So there's a social inversion.
11:52 I mean, that's true,
11:54 but the solution is not to eliminate people.
11:57 The solution should be to help.
11:59 And I used the word with the gentleman
12:01 with the other day in editorial purposely,
12:03 the untermensch, the under man.
12:06 You know, in a liberal society, animated by Christian impulses,
12:10 we should do subtle tweaks in society
12:14 to help those and elevate those people,
12:16 not to try to breed them out of existence
12:21 to make up for the fact that wealthy people
12:23 by definition have less children.
12:25 You know, in traditional societies,
12:26 they have more children to support themselves
12:28 and mote is a hedge against infant mortality.
12:31 There's just so many things going on.
12:34 But yes, that was all effective.
12:36 But what I want to get at,
12:37 let's just go back for a minute.
12:39 The fact that when the Nazis with the clearly stated
12:43 murderous policies might count published
12:48 about a decade or so before Hitler actually came to power,
12:50 it was no secret.
12:52 I mean, perhaps people were willfully ignorant,
12:54 but it wasn't the secret.
12:56 How easily the Lutheran Church, the Roman Catholic Church,
13:01 not every Catholic, but the Catholic Church
13:03 with its alliance and concord it with Rome
13:07 and even Seventh-day Adventist made alliances with the state
13:12 because Hitler like many political leaders
13:17 and more than most was willing
13:18 to perjure himself to get support.
13:21 And I've read the same thing, he says,
13:22 national socialism is based on Christianity.
13:26 I mean, yes, only a gullible fool
13:29 would believe that,
13:30 but there were plenty of gullible fools at the time.
13:32 They suspended their judgment.
13:34 And I think that's a salutary listen anywhere,
13:38 even in the US
13:39 when people are now
13:41 so, so determined to mix religion with politics,
13:44 this sort of inversion and perversion will take place.
13:48 Certainly.
13:49 And, you know, we see in history
13:52 similar situations that the closer that religion
13:56 and government intertwine,
13:59 the more danger
14:00 it presents to society in general, right?
14:03 And in particular, you know, going back to Nazi, Germany,
14:07 I think that one of the things that
14:09 when we look at the history there, we do see,
14:11 yes, there were a majority of the churches
14:14 across the board, different denominations
14:16 that lined up with that, the party line, so to speak.
14:19 There were also some individuals
14:21 like Bonheoffer and some others that were resistant.
14:26 I'm not that particularly admirer of Bonheoffer,
14:29 but, you know, put myself in his shoes.
14:32 If any of us were there, what would we have done?
14:34 You know, your life was at threat
14:35 to speak out against the Fuhrer.
14:37 But Bonheoffer,
14:39 I have trouble seeing him as a general model.
14:42 Remember he was an agent of the state.
14:46 He was in the secret police.
14:48 Why did he sign up there to start with?
14:50 I don't see that as admirable.
14:52 And then he got involved in a plot to kill the Fuhrer.
14:54 I don't feel as a Christian
14:56 that no matter what system I live in,
14:59 that I am justified in seeking the physical demise
15:03 of anyone in power.
15:05 And we ought to pray for our rulers,
15:07 we not to support them in every way.
15:10 Hitler clearly crossed the line
15:11 where he was asking things of Christians
15:13 that were accounted to what God demanded.
15:16 So there should have been civil disobedience there,
15:19 but to be an active part of a plan
15:21 to kill the leader, uh...
15:25 That part, I...
15:27 And I see Bonheoffer as well-intentioned,
15:31 and I mean, at least in, toward the end,
15:33 and you have to admire someone who gave his life
15:37 trying to stand for principle, but I just don't see him
15:39 as a good model for behavior at all points.
15:41 Sure.
15:43 But there were a number of Catholics
15:47 and Lutherans,
15:49 I don't know too many Adventists.
15:50 I mean, they might be,
15:52 but I know of Catholics and Lutherans
15:54 that wouldn't go into the military
15:56 when they were asked.
15:58 And, you know, now, I mean, when I was young,
16:00 you could go to Canada.
16:02 You know, I don't know
16:04 if too many of them went to jail
16:05 for refusing to go into the military.
16:07 I mean, that was the penalty, but back in the Hitler's era,
16:11 if you refused, you would likely be shot.
16:14 That was a capital offense.
16:15 I've read some of the trials.
16:17 So you have to admire the integrity they had.
16:21 Let's take a break and continue this
16:25 very sensitive discussion, but very relevant discussion
16:28 of some parallels to a lifetime ago in Europe.


Home

Revised 2021-07-19