Liberty Insider

Nationalism

Three Angels Broadcasting Network

Program transcript

Participants:

Home

Series Code: LI

Program Code: LI200467A


00:29 Welcome to the Liberty Insider.
00:31 This is your program
00:33 for those of you that follow this regularly
00:35 and if not, then it is yours.
00:37 And please stay with us because this is your program,
00:40 where we discuss religious liberty
00:42 in the United States very often
00:45 and elsewhere in the world
00:46 because religious liberty is the hot topic for our time.
00:50 My name is Lincoln Steed, editor of Liberty Magazine,
00:53 and my guest on this program,
00:55 top religious liberty expert Amireh Al Haddad.
00:59 You're director of Public Affairs
01:01 and Religious Liberty
01:02 for the Southern Union of the Seventh-day Adventists.
01:05 And I know you've been involved
01:07 hands on level for longer than me
01:10 on Liberty Magazine, 25 years or so, isn't it?
01:13 Yeah.
01:15 So let's use,
01:17 if not our experience
01:18 then our imagination on our worldview
01:20 and let's just looking at the world
01:22 as a whole.
01:24 How would you fit the emerging concept
01:26 in the US now
01:28 or at least the buzzword of nationalism?
01:30 Is this a global phenomenon or is it a passing phenomenon?
01:34 What's going on?
01:35 Because there's clearly a nationalist buzz
01:37 in Europe,
01:39 and the United States, and a few other countries.
01:41 Well, I think we've seen it just this year
01:43 with the Brexit happening.
01:47 People wanting to be
01:49 their own bosses again in Europe.
01:54 I think that we're seeing it in the US.
01:56 I concentrate more in the US with my job
01:59 than I do around the world.
02:01 But I definitely see
02:03 that there are issues that are happening.
02:05 I remember about 25 years ago
02:07 when the European Union was, kind of, coming to,
02:12 you know, formation
02:13 and everybody was like saying...
02:15 What did they call it before,
02:17 it was the European Common Market?
02:19 Common Market, yeah.
02:20 That was when I was a kid, even in Australia,
02:22 back in the early 60s.
02:25 Yeah.
02:26 It was very troubling at a distance in Australia.
02:28 They saw it as England
02:30 deserting its colonies and allies,
02:34 and what do we call?
02:36 Now I should remember the Commonwealth of Nations,
02:41 but England joined with Europe.
02:42 And that seemed like a done deal.
02:44 Now England don't want to deal with them.
02:45 No, a lot of people are hardened,
02:47 not really wanting to deal with them.
02:49 And, you know,
02:52 we used to always point to the EU as being,
02:56 you know, this prophetically plays into prophecy,
02:59 but, you know, to me,
03:01 it seems like it's falling apart
03:02 in a different way.
03:04 Here in the United States,
03:06 I think what we're saying is a rise in nationalism.
03:12 Yeah.
03:13 Well, there's another word I can use but...
03:15 Well, I want to...
03:16 Jingoism. Jingoism.
03:18 But I want to differentiate there
03:21 between nationalism and patriotism.
03:24 Yes.
03:25 Very good point
03:27 because there's a legitimate difference.
03:28 Yes.
03:30 Being patriotic is someone who, "I love my country.
03:34 I want to support my country.
03:36 You know, I think Americans are all great
03:38 and, you know, let's, you know, wave the flag."
03:41 That's great.
03:42 Nationalism though has a component to it
03:49 that is more of a taking over.
03:54 Well, I can summarize it in a negative sense.
03:58 In the gas crisis in the 70s,
04:02 they were bumper stickers, America love it or leave it.
04:04 Yeah.
04:05 That's the sort of bad nationalism
04:07 that no country needs.
04:08 And I think we're getting a dose of again.
04:10 Yeah.
04:11 But it also incorporates into it
04:14 a taking over of the government, you know?
04:18 Well, it's national identity,
04:20 and then you get to define who's a real American.
04:22 Whose identity I can define it. Correct.
04:25 And how will it work out in the US remains to be seen.
04:28 In European countries, it's clearly ethnic,
04:32 and sometimes a religious identity
04:33 going back to the religious wars,
04:35 but usually ethnic.
04:36 So the, you know,
04:38 the real Germans and the interlopers
04:42 that came here either get rid of them
04:44 by expelling or maybe melt them down.
04:47 You mentioned something in another program that we did
04:50 about the fall of Russia
04:53 and removing Russia
04:57 as our common enemy here in the US.
05:00 Well, I remember Shevardnadze made a comment
05:02 in the waning days of the Soviet Union.
05:06 He's speaking to the media, he said,
05:08 "We are going to deprive you of an enemy."
05:10 That's a very distinct, and he did.
05:12 And they did.
05:13 But who's our new enemy?
05:15 So commonly we say,
05:18 maybe immigrants are our new enemy,
05:20 or the one that we really have issue with.
05:23 And you may comment to this as well.
05:27 Terrorists are our enemies.
05:29 Well, who's...
05:30 Sort of the bogeyman.
05:32 Yeah, who's created
05:33 the biggest terroristic threat to us?
05:35 Well, Islam.
05:36 Well, now you're not fighting a country,
05:39 you're fighting a religion.
05:41 And ultimately an idea.
05:43 An idea.
05:44 And so, you fight that idea with the opposing idea,
05:47 which is Christianity.
05:49 So are we saying
05:51 that in our move towards nationalism,
05:54 we're going to embrace Christian nationalism
05:58 in a way that brings Christian nationalism
06:02 to a leadership position above everything else?
06:07 That's the concern. It is an interesting question.
06:10 And I think you're getting closer
06:12 to what's going to happen here.
06:14 Nationalism in the modern era,
06:16 when it's played out like that
06:18 ends up with something like Italy,
06:20 fascism,
06:21 because it becomes worship of the state.
06:23 In the modern world,
06:25 the nation is the state because it's structured now.
06:28 It's military, it's business.
06:31 And that's fascism in a nutshell, right?
06:33 It was.
06:35 And so I do believe that in many ways,
06:36 the US is moving toward a fascist model,
06:39 except that it's a very religious country.
06:42 And a large fraction of the religious people
06:45 have, sort of, always blended their religion
06:48 and the destiny of this country.
06:49 Manifest Destiny,
06:51 when I was studying history that impressed me greatly.
06:53 Manifest destiny
06:55 was the thinly disguised religious triumphalism.
06:58 So it's coming together
07:00 in an interesting way in our day.
07:02 Nazi Germany rode to power on the back of nationalism.
07:07 Of course, yeah.
07:09 I mean, when you want to look at a recent example...
07:13 Well, it was National Socialism.
07:14 It was National Socialism.
07:16 That was the title of Nazism.
07:18 You to be a good German
07:20 you're gonna, you know, do this.
07:22 I saw a program the other day and the title really got me.
07:26 It said the Incredible Lightness
07:29 of Being a Nazi.
07:32 A sense of, sort of,
07:33 liberation of fulfillment and of exceptionalism.
07:37 Incredible lightness.
07:38 And I don't think
07:40 that lightness has come upon this continent yet,
07:43 but it could.
07:45 It sort of relieves you from moral obligation.
07:48 But don't we say the incredible lightness
07:50 of being a Christian?
07:52 Oh, yes, we say that. Yeah.
07:53 Well, we say that, right? Yeah.
07:55 Cast your burdens upon the Lord and you're free.
07:58 Yeah. You're free. You're free.
08:00 And again, I want to differentiate
08:03 patriotism is different than nationalism.
08:05 Yeah, I think patriotism
08:08 is a very reasonable expectation
08:10 even of a Christian,
08:11 in fact, especially of a Christian,
08:13 in whatever country.
08:14 You know, Paul said some things
08:17 that I think taken wrongly can be characterized as...
08:22 Got to be careful, what do I call it
08:24 a very subservient statements about the state.
08:28 That it's not true that the state yields the sword
08:30 always for justice.
08:31 No, does not.
08:33 But he did make a good point that we live in this world,
08:38 we have a responsibility as part of society
08:41 to what the rule is to support them
08:43 as, you know,
08:44 as they are doing their best in a country.
08:46 We can't double guess everything they do,
08:48 but I'm not really sure
08:50 that Caligula deserved the loyalty
08:51 of the Christians.
08:53 That's another question.
08:54 But there's no evidence that Christians rebelled
08:56 just because they didn't like a persecuting emperor.
08:59 So they were good as citizens,
09:01 as their Christian loyalties would enable them to be.
09:06 In a country
09:07 with the separation of church and state,
09:09 why shouldn't we be the best of citizens?
09:11 Yes.
09:12 And going back to the job of the state,
09:16 really the job of the state is, some people will say,
09:20 "To give you security,"
09:22 but I disagree a little bit with that.
09:25 What I think the job of the state is,
09:27 is to provide justice.
09:30 You know, yes, there is some issues
09:33 of security involved,
09:35 but the job of the state is to provide justice,
09:38 the job of the Christian
09:41 is to defend and preserve liberty.
09:45 And, you know, we have to balance that
09:48 because everyone that lives in this society
09:52 should be part of this society.
09:55 And, you know, we talked earlier
09:57 about voting in another program.
09:59 And when we vote,
10:02 we vote to elect leaders who will provide us justice.
10:07 And when we vote,
10:09 we should vote for laws
10:11 that will uphold and defend freedom and liberty.
10:15 And this is kind of our...
10:17 It was an ideal that as I took an extreme, you know,
10:21 Caligula Roman Emperor,
10:22 but there's plenty of countries in the world
10:24 that from the outside
10:26 don't appear to be truly upholding justice,
10:29 certainly not liberty,
10:30 and certainly not religious liberty.
10:33 But I think a Christian are going to be careful
10:36 with our mixing,
10:39 Lord may kill or know the Bible but, you know,
10:40 living without a piece of bleach
10:44 as you can with other people.
10:46 Yeah, right.
10:47 That is a Christian idea.
10:49 We're not to cause rancor
10:51 with whatever the ruling system is,
10:53 and only respond I think, in a challenge
10:56 when it's restricting our worship of God.
11:00 So it's not in a general Christian sense,
11:03 a matter of us only supporting,
11:07 you know, a democratic Christian country.
11:09 But it's a matter of great happenstance,
11:12 most people living in the United States
11:13 live in a country that makes a high ideal
11:15 that it's going to defend separation of church and state,
11:19 it's going to defend the rights of the individual,
11:21 you know, all of the great norms
11:22 that we've gotten not just from in the US,
11:24 but from the history of the British Isles.
11:27 That's a good heritage.
11:29 It's as high an ideal
11:31 as I think as the world is seen in a secular sense.
11:34 So we have even more reason than usual
11:36 to be supportive of that.
11:39 Definitely.
11:41 But when I look at the rise of nationalism here,
11:45 this, of course, is a campaign.
11:48 It's a voting year.
11:49 It's a big election year in the country.
11:53 And I go back when I talk about this,
11:58 it's going to sound like I'm very liberal
12:01 in the way I'm talking.
12:03 But my basis and my understanding
12:05 in philosophy really comes
12:07 from a conservative biblical viewpoint.
12:11 And that is that we tend to wrap the Bible in the flag
12:16 and we tend to associate...
12:18 Not good.
12:19 Not good at all.
12:21 We tend to associate one political party
12:23 with a godly state
12:25 and the other political party with an ungodly state.
12:29 And if you remember in the Book of Joshua,
12:36 where the children of Israel
12:39 had just passed over the River Jordan,
12:41 and this is the second parting of a water
12:44 that they've crossed over at God's...
12:47 With the ark, yeah. Yeah, with the ark.
12:49 And later,
12:51 almost immediately after this happens,
12:54 the incarnate Christ comes and they say,
12:56 "Who are you? Are you for us or against us?"
13:00 And Jesus' reply is,
13:02 "I'm neither for nor against you."
13:04 He doesn't say, "I'm for you." Yeah, it's a good point.
13:06 Even though this miracle was just,
13:08 you know, done for them.
13:11 They crossed over and weren't attacked.
13:14 Well, didn't I follow shortly after?
13:18 Did it.
13:20 Where they made a preemptive strike
13:21 at their town in their own comfort and so,
13:24 they were sent packing.
13:26 They were sent packing going off.
13:28 But here is Christ incarnate
13:30 before His physical coming to earth.
13:35 And He specifically says,
13:37 "Look, I'm not for or against you."
13:41 Yeah. Yeah, that's a good point.
13:42 And so for as Christians to say
13:45 this is what we're going to ride nationally
13:49 to enhance or to create a better understanding
13:52 of Christianity in our country.
13:55 It's very, very dangerous.
13:56 Yeah, well, it's a loaded time.
13:57 And, you know, I think,
14:00 you and I and many of our viewers
14:02 in the United States particularly
14:03 can share this trepidation.
14:06 Really what a lot of it is to be, got to be honest,
14:09 but to be direct,
14:10 I think is a fear of modernization,
14:13 the forces of modernization that are partly political,
14:16 partly mechanical, and demographic and so on.
14:22 You know, people of faith
14:23 and their faith perspective seem under great threat.
14:28 And this is my view
14:29 when nations when they're fading
14:31 and feeling weak,
14:33 people groups when they feel under threat
14:35 that they might disappear,
14:36 the numbers are declining,
14:37 that's when they do the most radical dangerous
14:39 and even violent things.
14:41 So that makes it by definition, a dangerous time.
14:43 Stay with us.
14:45 We'll be back after a short break
14:46 to continue what I think
14:48 is a hugely important discussion.


Home

Revised 2020-07-06