Liberty Insider

Splitting The Difference

Three Angels Broadcasting Network

Program transcript

Participants:

Home

Series Code: LI

Program Code: LI190450B


00:01 Welcome back to the Liberty Insider.
00:03 Before the break with guest Greg Hamilton,
00:05 we were back to basics,
00:08 talk about separation of church and state,
00:10 and the dynamic through the years
00:12 from the founding, the Civil War
00:14 and now even some of the justices seem to be
00:20 restating what the First Amendment
00:23 we thought put down so clearly.
00:25 Where do you think we're going with this?
00:28 Is this just, you know, sound and fury signifying
00:31 nothing to paraphrase or to quote Shakespeare?
00:34 Or is this a harbinger of a real shift in the way
00:39 the church state issues
00:41 are administered legally in the US?
00:42 I think it's a fundamental misunderstanding
00:44 of the religion clauses of the First Amendment.
00:47 You have the Establishment Clause
00:49 where it says,
00:50 Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment,
00:53 an is the root word for any establishment
00:57 or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
00:59 And those two clauses are vitally important.
01:03 The Free Exercise Clause acts as a attention,
01:09 a intended tension between Free Exercise
01:14 and the separation of church and state.
01:15 The Free Exercise Clause was meant to make sure that
01:18 there wasn't this slide down,
01:20 the slippery slope towards godlessness.
01:23 And then the Establishment Clause was
01:24 to make sure that religion
01:26 or churches didn't control the government, okay?
01:30 And so you have that intention,
01:32 but it's a purposeful intention that basically give us
01:36 what we know to be religious freedom today.
01:39 And unfortunately,
01:40 people don't understand this tension, a needed tension,
01:42 a necessary tension
01:44 between secularism and people of faith
01:46 that has always existed since the founding.
01:49 And so, really, when you think about it,
01:52 it was designed by intent to do that,
01:55 and to unravel that
01:56 to where you have religious freedom
01:59 or the Free Exercise Clause
02:01 to dominate the Establishment Clause
02:03 where conservatives and even some liberals who are,
02:09 what I call, postmodern liberals,
02:12 basically say that are neo conservatives
02:16 in some respects,
02:17 who have come over from the liberal side,
02:19 but they basically say that the founders only intended
02:24 to prevent the establishment
02:25 of a national church and nothing more.
02:27 That states could basically form
02:30 their own favorite churches through taxation,
02:34 that the founders intended that which...
02:36 Okay,
02:38 they didn't necessarily intended it,
02:39 they allowed it to continue at the state level.
02:42 But the states realized that
02:43 this was not good for them.
02:45 They wanted to mirror the Federal Constitution.
02:48 In fact, so much so that when you look at Madison,
02:51 he originally intended in the Federal Constitution
02:53 1787 at the convention,
02:55 to state in the constitution
02:57 that no religion shall be established
03:02 even at the state level.
03:03 That is, he wanted to eviscerate
03:05 even state establishments in the Federal Constitution.
03:07 And they didn't go along with...
03:09 How could they have done that?
03:10 They didn't go along with that.
03:11 They didn't have the power over the states.
03:13 So the state said,
03:14 "Okay, we can do better than the Federal Constitution."
03:16 They one by one, each state started disestablishing
03:19 their state tax supported churches.
03:20 Patrick Henry was their great antagonist
03:22 on this sort of stuff.
03:24 Yes, exactly.
03:25 Let me give you a view of history
03:26 that I have never read.
03:29 You've never read?
03:30 No. But I...
03:32 So how could you be accurate, if you haven't read it?
03:33 Well, it's a distillation of many things that I've read.
03:36 Okay.
03:37 I studied Linguistics back in college.
03:40 And it's a curious fact
03:43 that when you talk about Elizabeth in the English,
03:46 you know, old E, English.
03:48 I said that way.
03:50 But you know, people pronounce the old with an E.
03:53 Old E. Yes.
03:55 It's a plain fact
03:57 that Elizabeth in English is long gone for most people,
04:01 but the settlers here in the new world
04:05 and the Appalachians,
04:06 they were culturally hermetically sealed.
04:10 And the way they speak,
04:11 they're as close to Elizabeth in English.
04:14 You know, hillbilly language, right?
04:16 And I believe in a certain parallel
04:20 to that the mindset on religion in this particular,
04:25 there was extent coming up to the US Revolution.
04:30 I believe it's basically been baked
04:32 into the American thinking.
04:35 Because, you know, the ocean now it's nothing,
04:39 you know, Trump can tweet across the world in a moment.
04:42 But, you know, as recently as 100-150 years ago,
04:45 the US was quite isolated.
04:49 So effects that were planted here have sort of...
04:52 World War I and World War II
04:53 brought it out of its isolations.
04:55 You're right. Yeah.
04:56 Politically. Yeah.
04:57 But I think even to this day,
04:59 the average American does not know
05:00 much about the rest of the world,
05:01 doesn't care much about the rest of the world.
05:04 And so this is the carry on.
05:06 And coming up to the US War of Independence
05:11 and establishing the Constitution and so on,
05:13 what was the thinking in England?
05:15 They were barely a couple of generations
05:19 passed a Civil War in England,
05:21 when the big battle was precisely
05:24 between the established church
05:26 that was papal in its tendency that was defending the Puritans
05:31 that was the grand movement
05:33 that was and the Puritan Movement
05:35 was colored by the enlightenment,
05:37 progressive more open views
05:40 that you could even say secular.
05:41 But believe the religion was a private matter.
05:44 The government's not gonna tell me anything on that.
05:46 I believe all of that's planted here
05:49 and that's what was put into the Constitution.
05:53 And ironically, they were super conservative,
05:57 but with this baked in antagonism
06:00 and separation from establishment.
06:02 Yep.
06:03 And you know... I agree with you.
06:05 I think that's a good analysis.
06:06 And further, even at this day,
06:09 we made a comment earlier in this program
06:11 about the moral devolution in the US,
06:12 but the hard facts are,
06:14 you know, in spite of the higher prison rate
06:17 in the US and Hollywood run amok and all the rest,
06:20 compared to the rest of the Western world,
06:22 the US is a priggish, puritanic mindset.
06:27 All right, let me throw something at you.
06:29 John Adams, one of our Constitutional founders wrote,
06:33 "Our constitution was made
06:34 only for a moral and religious people.
06:37 It is wholly inadequate
06:38 to the government of any other."
06:40 What did he mean by that?
06:42 I have an idea of what he meant.
06:44 For me, it's very simple.
06:47 He recognized that people
06:50 in the newly formed United States of America
06:55 basically were somewhat religious.
06:59 In other words, not holy.
07:00 In fact, statistics show that
07:02 only about 13% of the populace actually went to church.
07:06 This is mind blowing, okay?
07:09 But they still professed
07:12 one form of Christianity or another.
07:15 The country was very diverse
07:17 with different Protestant religions
07:19 throughout the country.
07:20 And it was very acceptable. Very accepted.
07:23 They had Jewish people, they had Catholics,
07:26 largely in Maryland and some in Massachusetts.
07:30 And so you had this diversity.
07:32 In fact, at that point there was no known Muslim
07:35 to exist in the United States at that time.
07:39 Except for maybe a few slaves here
07:42 and there that had been, you know, imported.
07:44 Quite a few. Yes, quite a few, who had...
07:47 And that's a whole another study.
07:48 You can easily trace
07:50 Islamic influence through the slave culture...
07:51 Yes, exactly.
07:53 Up and passed the Civil War.
07:54 So what does he mean?
07:55 You know, I really...
07:57 If you study John Adams and you study Thomas Jefferson,
07:59 especially, in their letter correspondence
08:01 back and forth to each other.
08:03 You find that John Adams is quite
08:05 the major skeptic regarding religion.
08:07 In fact, he believed that nothing...
08:08 It could die out after 200 years.
08:10 Nothing in the Bible was inspired
08:12 except the words of Jesus Christ.
08:14 And he even narrowed it down then he says,
08:16 "I even doubt that," he says.
08:17 You know, there's so many translations
08:19 and there's so many...
08:20 You know, we don't know who really wrote what,
08:22 and in the end,
08:23 the only thing we can accept is the beatitudes
08:26 by Jesus Christ as being the only authentic source.
08:29 And Jefferson was much the same.
08:31 You know, and he said,
08:32 "Maybe David's Psalm 23, you know.
08:35 But other than that, you know, he was quite skeptic.
08:37 And these guys were really eggheads.
08:39 I mean, there were really well read.
08:42 And so what did Adams mean?
08:44 I think he was a,
08:46 what you call a utilitarian in his thinking.
08:52 In other words, he was a pragmatist.
08:54 He believed that religion was necessary, okay?
09:00 You could even cite Karl Marx here.
09:02 It's the opioid of the masses here, okay?
09:05 But that's really
09:06 what he was saying nothing different.
09:08 He was saying that
09:10 religion was absolutely essential
09:14 to order in society.
09:17 A well ordered society required religion,
09:20 but it didn't need to be established.
09:22 His answer was no, it should not be established.
09:26 You're right.
09:27 On a certain level they were even cynics and deist,
09:32 of course, were acceptable cynics.
09:35 But I think they were onto something.
09:38 The Constitution is a fairly spare document.
09:41 So spare, hardly anyone seems to be reading it.
09:45 But I think they depended upon the cultural glue
09:49 that they inherited.
09:50 And England, it's Protestantism in its all,
09:56 not all most of its European wars.
09:58 That was its calling.
09:59 So how does that translate to today, however?
10:02 Well, I think this is where we're facing that.
10:04 What is it to be an American?
10:05 I hear about the American dream.
10:08 That's mostly what it is to be an American.
10:10 But that dream is always been a bit of an illusion.
10:13 But if you look at it,
10:14 it's a patriotism built on God and country.
10:16 I'm an apple pie, and you know, God...
10:19 Oh, don't forget Chevrolet.
10:20 And so how do you maintain
10:25 this quite specific form of national identity
10:28 if it's not an acceptable form of religion?
10:31 And I think that's what's at play at the moment.
10:33 Yeah, I agree.
10:34 Lincoln left out baseball and Chevrolet,
10:38 American traditions.
10:39 Well, the Constitutional separation
10:41 of church and state
10:42 is one of those American traditions
10:44 that some people want to do away with.
10:47 They want to favor one religion over another,
10:49 mainly Christianity against all others.
10:52 That's not what the Constitution founders
10:54 intended.
10:55 So I'm thankful for the American tradition
10:58 of the Constitutional separation
11:00 of church and state
11:01 that provides religious freedom for everyone,
11:05 Jews, Muslims, Catholics, Protestants, Hindus, everybody.
11:11 And I'm thankful for America for that reason.
11:16 Over the years,
11:18 I've sat in a number of meetings where,
11:21 I think, well meaning Christians
11:23 that are involved in church state issues have gotten up
11:26 and with some certain vehemence,
11:29 have said, "There is no such thing
11:30 as separation of church and state in the Constitution."
11:34 Well, that sort of true but it's in the same vein
11:38 as it depends what the meaning of is this.
11:41 We know what the Constitution says.
11:44 It's designed to pull away the state
11:47 from being involved in religious matters,
11:49 supporting a state church,
11:51 and telling people what they cannot, cannot do
11:53 from a moral religious perspective.
11:56 Where will this end?
11:58 There's no question
12:00 that many people of good faith and good intent
12:03 are questioning the need to separate church and state.
12:07 Forgetting that Jesus Himself said,
12:10 when faced with the question of money
12:12 and whose loyalty is really at stake,
12:14 He says, "Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's,
12:18 and unto God that are things that are God's."
12:23 For Liberty Insider, this is Lincoln Steed.


Home

Revised 2020-01-16