Liberty Insider

The Challenges of Defending Religious Liberty

Three Angels Broadcasting Network

Program transcript

Participants:

Home

Series Code: LI

Program Code: LI190431B


00:04 Welcome back to the Liberty Insider.
00:06 Before the break, with Kingsley,
00:08 we were getting to some nitty-gritty issues
00:11 on religious liberty.
00:13 And let's just pause for a minute on the one
00:15 that in the United States and Canada that is really,
00:18 and Australia, and in England for that matter but...
00:23 it's a big issue on how Christians relate
00:26 to the new found gay and transgender rights.
00:31 And it's more of mobbing put forward
00:33 by people on both sides
00:36 that it's sort of a choice that you either have gay rights
00:39 or religious rights and,
00:41 you know, the gay community,
00:43 some of the radical ones would like to take away
00:45 the right of people of faith
00:47 to even have a view point on this,
00:50 a negative view point.
00:51 And similarly, Christians would like to restrict
00:55 the right of gays
00:56 and it comes to ahead in the famous cake case
00:59 where this baker...
01:02 We'll never quite know how he said it,
01:04 but a gay couple came, and I'm sure it was a set up
01:08 because in reality,
01:10 cake making, and wedding photography,
01:13 and things like that,
01:14 you go where there's some party go, right?
01:18 It's more than just a business transaction,
01:20 you want someone that is on, the fellow traveler,
01:23 and, you know, it's a feel good relationship.
01:25 So this gay couple came,
01:27 and asked this Christian cake maker
01:28 to make them a wedding cake.
01:30 Yes.
01:31 And no, no, thank you.
01:33 And the Supreme Court in the US upheld his right,
01:37 but they did it mostly
01:39 because the gay community maligned him a lot.
01:43 And, of course, it's not good to have someone maligned
01:45 for their faith.
01:46 So I don't think we're seeing the end of this,
01:49 but how do you see that dynamically?
01:51 You know, if you were running a cake shop,
01:53 what would you do?
01:54 Well, I can do one better than that.
01:56 I'm a minister of the gospel.
01:58 Well, let's just say you're a minister
01:59 running a cake shop.
02:02 No...
02:05 The mixing of morality,
02:07 the question of morality on what we believe, that's a...
02:11 While it is personal on a certain level,
02:15 but within the religious community,
02:17 regardless to what's your faith disposition is,
02:20 and there are those other religious organizations
02:25 that viewed it a little differently.
02:30 We are now are giving or wrestling with the idea
02:35 of where do we draw the line
02:37 with respect to what we believe,
02:38 and what we teach, and what we practice.
02:43 We need to draw the line between the desire of someone
02:46 whether their lifestyle has been chosen or whatever.
02:50 How far can we go without having to compromise
02:54 on what we believe?
02:56 Everyone has the right to choose to do
02:59 or believe what they want to.
03:01 And this is getting messy so much
03:03 so that some of my colleagues
03:05 and I choose them not to perform a certain...
03:11 That they will not perform weddings
03:13 or civil weddings as it were,
03:17 and they only keep it to the church.
03:20 Well, as a pastor, I think, that's a little bit different.
03:24 If you're a minister of religion,
03:26 but if certain type of a religion that,
03:30 you know, the subset of Christianity
03:31 is the Seventh-day Adventist.
03:33 I don't see any obligation,
03:35 and necessity or whether be a requirement for you
03:39 to perform a marriage
03:42 that's outside of the spiritual guidelines
03:44 that you adhere to.
03:46 You are a facilitator for that faith,
03:50 not of anything because the Bible does...
03:55 The Old Testament condemn
03:57 that is to facilitate witchcraft,
03:59 for example.
04:00 And I think you'd be in the same,
04:02 but that's administrating religious rights.
04:06 And even the state clearly recognizes
04:08 within the church structure, they put it as exemptions,
04:14 but out in the civil sphere,
04:15 even if you happen to be a minister,
04:17 you're running a cake shop.
04:19 I'll get you to hypothesize on this yet.
04:24 You make cakes, even wedding cakes,
04:26 and this couple comes jauntily through the door
04:32 and you're sort of taken aback
04:33 because this is not a behavior or arrangement
04:37 that is consistent with the old biblical view.
04:40 What would you do when they come,
04:43 money in the hand, yeah,
04:45 we want you to make our wedding cake.
04:48 Well, haven't come across that yet,
04:50 but since you asked the question,
04:55 I have to be true to who I am and what I believe,
04:59 and hopefully,
05:01 in explaining to them why I cannot do this
05:04 for whatever religions they were done...
05:05 For whatever reasons, they would understand that.
05:08 There's a way in which you can communicate that.
05:11 Yeah, that's exactly what I believe.
05:13 Yes.
05:14 But there's a bit more to than that.
05:15 What if, after you communicated
05:17 they still want you to do the cake?
05:20 You'd have to refuse,
05:21 probably, have to refuse it because you...
05:24 Why would you refuse to make a cake
05:26 for a murderer, say?
05:32 Well, a murderer wanting the cake made
05:36 because you asked me the question about...
05:38 Or a wife beater...
05:41 A wife beater.
05:44 Or a child abuser.
05:45 Yeah, they're all moral infract,
05:47 they all have a moral component to that, right?
05:51 I wouldn't...
05:52 That you'd have to deal with as each person comes.
05:56 In reality, you don't know that there's such people.
05:58 Well, if you don't know that's not...
05:59 If you're running a cake shop,
06:02 you got to presume that
06:03 a reasonable number of the people
06:05 coming in the door are guilty of some infraction,
06:08 moral or legal or maybe all of the above,
06:12 the worst you can imagine.
06:13 But, you see, you cannot judge,
06:15 you cannot judge motives by the people.
06:18 Just as anyone can come to a church on any week,
06:22 and any day of the week, Saturday or Sunday.
06:25 You can't judge them just by how they look
06:27 or what they say, you judge them by what they...
06:30 How they behave, unless you find out.
06:33 So 'cause you're not accountable
06:34 for what you don't know.
06:35 But I think, you and I are in agreement
06:37 with what you said early.
06:38 It seems to me that if some...
06:41 First of all, in the real world,
06:43 they're not much going to come.
06:45 This was clearly a test case from a gay couple
06:48 representing an organization
06:51 wanting to flush out Christian bigotry and they...
06:54 I'm not saying it necessarily was,
06:56 but if they came.
07:01 It seems like the cake maker would,
07:03 they would...
07:05 Maybe by their behavior or something,
07:07 it would be sort of self-evident.
07:09 Well, two males I guess are self evident, gay couple.
07:12 It seemed to me very reasonable, legal,
07:15 and moral for such a cake maker to say,
07:19 "Thank you for choosing my business.
07:23 You may not be aware of it, I'm a Christian,"
07:26 or you could identify yourself further,
07:29 you know, "in my reading of the Bible,
07:32 you know,
07:33 your lifestyle is something that really is not recommended,
07:37 and, you know, I have views on that,
07:39 and you should be aware of this,
07:41 and well, I thank you for choosing my business.
07:44 I may not be the best choice
07:46 to really do the full justice to this cake
07:48 that you would, perhaps expect.
07:50 But if you still want me to do it,
07:52 I will do what I can."
07:55 'Cause the argument is,
07:56 you can't put yourself creatively into it,
07:58 which you couldn't.
08:00 But then there sounds like an element of a compromise.
08:04 Well, that's the same compromise as Jesus.
08:06 I can't see that Jesus was drunkard
08:09 and a glutton or whatever,
08:11 but He associated freely with such people, right?
08:15 But it seems to me
08:17 that sort of thing lays at the opposition,
08:19 lays out a reference to them
08:23 that they're not in accordance with your moral view.
08:26 You're not going to be part of what they're doing,
08:30 but it's just a minimal effort,
08:32 you know, which is mechanical and not creative
08:35 for you're putting yourself fully into it.
08:36 You'll do what you can,
08:38 but it's not really part of their procedure,
08:42 and I think, in reality, if with such an explanation,
08:45 why would they continue?
08:47 They're going to go elsewhere,
08:48 but you've not said anything offensive nor illegal.
08:53 I don't think with that sort of a response
08:55 you could be accused of deep prejudice
08:59 or not wanting to deal with them or whatever.
09:01 Well, you see, each case is different.
09:03 They could very well say, "Well, you're discriminating."
09:06 You have this service to the public.
09:09 You're discriminating against us
09:10 because of what you might think or what you believe.
09:14 And here in lies that grey area is to how far do you go?
09:19 And ultimately, it comes down to conscience.
09:22 My real point is, I think,
09:24 there is a charitable way for Christians
09:27 to deal with those that are out of harmony
09:30 with what we believe.
09:32 By definition, we're outreaching all the time
09:34 and dealing with non-believers.
09:37 But we shouldn't encourage this compromise,
09:39 so this conflict rather, which is being set up,
09:42 I think, somewhat falsely.
09:44 Why should Christians be the enemy of the non-believer?
09:48 We're there to reconcile them to God.
09:50 Yeah, exactly.
09:51 But we've made a rot in many instances
09:53 by not representing well.
09:56 Yes.
09:57 And that's really where I'm coming.
09:59 Okay, so what we have to do in the public arena,
10:03 they say,
10:04 "Make a friend before you need a friend."
10:07 And you're looking out for the interest
10:10 of that individual,
10:11 and then let's find the common ground
10:13 where we can have a mutual relationship.
10:15 That's sort of what I am saying.
10:16 Okay, so...
10:18 And we need to diffuse this a little
10:19 because it's not in anyone's interest
10:21 to step up this great enmity
10:23 between Christian interests and civil interests.
10:25 Yes, and I honestly believe that
10:28 this is the sweet thing about
10:31 public views on religious liberty.
10:33 Making connections, being sensitive, being open,
10:38 and treating everyone as nicely and fairly as you possibly can
10:42 in the process of trying to offer a service
10:45 and to be open-minded, and that's what we do.
10:50 Jesus was asked many trick questions
10:53 by those trying to have Him stumble
10:57 on the realities of the day.
10:59 He was asked, for example, "This tower that fell,"
11:01 you know, with those, I think it was 17.
11:04 Well, they're more wicked than anyone else.
11:06 And Jesus said, "Of course, not."
11:08 And with religious liberty,
11:09 we're dealing with really modern day issues,
11:12 not always obviously religious,
11:15 sometimes people of faith
11:17 put up against different moral choices
11:20 as the case with the baker.
11:22 But as always,
11:23 we need to apply the principle of freedom in Christ,
11:27 a full human potential brought to bear
11:30 on all the complicating issues of modern life,
11:33 most of which
11:34 when it's boiled down to the final point
11:38 really devolve around
11:39 how do we represent our Lord and our Creator,
11:43 and apply "Morality to present day situations."
11:49 For Liberty Insider, this is Lincoln Steed.


Home

Revised 2019-04-19