Liberty Insider

The Mother of All Parliaments

Three Angels Broadcasting Network

Program transcript

Participants:

Home

Series Code: LI

Program Code: LI190428A


00:26 Welcome to the Liberty Insider.
00:28 This is your program designed to bring you news,
00:30 views, updates, analysis,
00:33 and general information on religious liberty in the US
00:36 and around the world.
00:38 My name is Lincoln Steed,
00:40 and I have a very special guest on my program,
00:43 Kingsley Palmer.
00:45 He works for religious liberty in Arizona
00:49 for the Seventh-day Adventist Church,
00:50 and I should say that I edit Liberty magazine
00:53 also for the Seventh-day Adventist Church,
00:54 although Liberty is directed at everybody.
00:58 Very few of our members would even see this magazine,
01:01 which is distributed to thought leaders,
01:03 government leaders, politicians, and so on.
01:08 I'm sure people have figured out by now
01:10 that my accent does betray me,
01:12 and that while I have lived most of my life in the US,
01:14 I have an Australian ancestry and origin.
01:19 And your accent will betray you almost the moment
01:22 you open your mouth.
01:24 You grew up and lived many years in England,
01:27 and now you've lived many more years,
01:29 I think in the United States, and the few in India.
01:33 But let's talk about England, the mother country.
01:37 You know, mother comes to mind a lot
01:39 when you talk about England.
01:40 Although when you use the word mother
01:42 in the modern world,
01:43 you think of Saddam Hussein and the mother of all battles.
01:46 Yes, yes, I remember that one.
01:48 It didn't turn out to be thankfully.
01:51 But there is a mother term in England
01:54 that is used now and then.
01:55 They talk about the English Parliament
01:57 is the mother of all parliaments,
01:59 mother of all legislative bodies.
02:02 So I don't feel embarrassed here
02:04 filming in the United States to sort of reach back there
02:07 because England has been a model
02:10 and a precursor to many things,
02:14 including the United States experiment.
02:20 And I must admit, even as I think about that,
02:23 I have fond memories in Australia
02:25 and in the US of sitting in my car
02:27 on a number of occasions
02:29 and listening with some excitement
02:31 to the debates in Parliament.
02:33 Oh, they're very rigorous.
02:36 Sometimes borderline feud.
02:38 Right, borderline street feud.
02:40 Exactly, exactly.
02:42 You know, on one occasion, someone yelled out to Obama
02:45 during a state of the union address,
02:46 "You lie," and he was pretty much objecting it.
02:48 Yes, definitely.
02:49 But that's normal.
02:50 That would just pass over your head.
02:52 You know, in the Australian Parliament,
02:53 which again is modeled after the mother of all parliaments,
02:56 I saw in a sequence once where the opposition leader
03:01 called the Prime Minister a liar repeatedly,
03:04 and he was asked to retract that
03:07 or he'd be recognized, in other words ejected.
03:10 In the end, he was ejected,
03:11 but he retracted at first and was accepted.
03:16 And then he says, "Yes, I retract,"
03:18 he says, "but he's a liar anyway."
03:22 Interesting.
03:23 So that's the style.
03:24 But all of that aside, England, it's has been an interesting,
03:29 I think, experiment in applying,
03:34 you know, freedom principles
03:36 in an increasingly turbulent world.
03:39 What's your take on
03:41 how England has handled some of the stresses?
03:43 In another program,
03:44 you mentioned the Irish question.
03:46 Yes.
03:48 I can't even say it turned out.
03:50 Well, it turned out well, but it seems to have gone away
03:53 because they were afraid that that'd be lumped in
03:55 with the post 9/11 reaction.
03:58 But the underlying issue is never as old.
04:00 But how is the English democracy
04:02 managed to deal with so many competing issues,
04:07 not least of which religious conflicts
04:10 through the ages in England?
04:12 Well, I think...
04:13 The church of England, the singular church,
04:16 but it's not been that simple, has it ever?
04:18 No, it hasn't.
04:20 And I think part of that if I can call it an experiment,
04:23 to me, in fact the parliament's been
04:25 in operation for close to 1,000 years,
04:29 and has the demographics in Britain has changed,
04:34 so as the view of the world, the Commonwealth
04:36 or what used to be form a common...
04:38 Colonial dominions, if I may use that term.
04:44 The British had to adjust themselves through that,
04:47 the changing and in particularly
04:49 with respect to immigration,
04:51 you know, after the Second World War,
04:53 you know that you had the Marshall Plan here
04:56 to rebuild Britain.
04:58 And that meant people from former colonies
05:01 coming to Britain, residing there,
05:03 that's how I got there.
05:06 I'm the son of immigrants, and therefore,
05:08 what they brought to the table
05:10 in order to rebuild the infrastructure
05:14 of the United Kingdom,
05:15 they brought their experiences,
05:17 they brought what they understood
05:19 to be important to them and so...
05:21 Well, you're ready to getting it.
05:22 I was setting you up.
05:23 You are getting it, what I really think
05:25 is the part of the secret of the British system.
05:28 It's ultimately an inclusion
05:30 even though the societal structure in England
05:34 was very stratified, and to this day,
05:38 I think they still have aristocratic...
05:39 Well, you know, you got class system, they do,
05:42 that I think, you know,
05:43 as successive generations have come along,
05:46 so has change.
05:48 And adaptability is important.
05:52 If I may look across the pond, as they often say,
05:55 here, I don't know
05:58 that it's been embraced the same way.
06:04 If anything extremely, it has become almost untenable
06:11 in terms of, okay, you open the doors,
06:15 you invite people to come in, and let's face it,
06:19 we talk about the cosmopolitan melting pot.
06:22 It shouldn't be a melting pot.
06:24 We used to use that term back home.
06:26 No, it needs to be a salad.
06:28 In other words, if you've got people,
06:30 we have the Church of England, right?
06:32 You have many different churches there,
06:34 Birmingham, you know, you're either one of two camps.
06:37 You either Protestant or evangelical
06:40 or you're Roman Catholic or what have you,
06:42 and then in between, you've got all these different groups.
06:45 And adaptability is important, and being open-minded.
06:49 That's one thing I do like about my development,
06:54 my growth at the same time,
06:59 but you don't find that here,
07:01 and people have resisted for it.
07:02 You've seen parliament, you've seen,
07:05 an honorable noble gentleman, he's got the floor.
07:08 You say honorable,
07:09 but dishonorable things are exchanged.
07:12 But yet, they can find common ground
07:16 for the good of everybody.
07:18 Now it's not perfect.
07:20 Here, it's pretty different
07:23 in terms of your political affiliation.
07:28 It's sometimes attached to what you believe
07:32 and depending on which side of the aisle,
07:33 whether you're left, right or center somewhere.
07:37 That guides and influences
07:39 how you see other people even in a public setting.
07:43 That's worth mentioning that
07:45 there was a big political debate
07:48 in the early American experiment about parties.
07:52 They didn't have parties at the very beginning.
07:55 And not by accident, they had rejected the parties,
07:58 Whigs and Tories system of England
08:00 because they saw some issues there.
08:03 And it's worth remembering.
08:04 While it works pretty well at the moment,
08:06 there's been some dangerous polarizations
08:09 in the English system.
08:11 And I love history, and, you know,
08:15 favorite part of my history of England was the period
08:18 with the Puritans and the civil war,
08:20 and the protectorate and so on, politics got toxic then.
08:25 Of course, it became a republic
08:27 for a short space of time under Cromwell,
08:29 but reverted back to what it was.
08:31 But I think at the moment, it's working quite well,
08:34 given the dysfunctional world we live in.
08:37 And you're right,
08:39 in the US, which is heading rapidly
08:41 toward dysfunction on many levels,
08:44 but particularly with the religious dynamic behind it,
08:48 wouldn't hurt to take a leaf
08:50 from what England has gained by experience,
08:53 hard experience often.
08:55 Well, again,
08:56 with the arrival of people from around the world
09:02 into the country,
09:05 and there's had to be a level of okay,
09:09 acceptance, understanding, open-mindedness.
09:14 I was raised in it.
09:15 It wasn't perfect.
09:17 Immigrants were not always treated
09:18 as well as they should have been.
09:21 But now successive generations
09:23 have been born and raised there,
09:25 brought into the idea,
09:27 this is the country which you are now a part of,
09:31 and have moved up the ladder as it were
09:36 to places which grandparents would never have dreamed
09:39 could have happened.
09:40 And so the dialogue has had to change.
09:43 The viewpoints have had to change.
09:45 And let's not even talk about
09:46 the entrance into the European community
09:47 because that's a whole another story.
09:49 Or the exit.
09:50 Or the exit or the Brexit.
09:52 But they've had to have an open-mind, right?
09:56 And to keep the peace,
09:59 and it's probably less class stratified
10:04 now than it ever was.
10:06 And it's been healthy.
10:08 And we and I can sit down and talk
10:11 and have a conversation about so many different things,
10:14 and yet respect.
10:15 We have a Muslim mayor.
10:18 Think about having that here in the United States.
10:21 You know, this is the Congress,
10:24 the last elections that they had, you know, for...
10:29 Back in November,
10:31 you've seen the diversified House of Representatives
10:35 and the more stratified, you know, Senate.
10:40 So adaptability, open-mindedness.
10:45 We've learned, we haven't got there yet.
10:47 And I say we going across the pond
10:51 have had to be adaptable.
10:52 And I think it bodes well in terms of engaging.
10:56 I think it bodes well in terms of having an open mind
11:00 and understanding, and a degree of acceptance
11:03 or choosing to agree to disagree.
11:05 You know, I'm pursuing this for good reason.
11:08 It seems to me at the moment,
11:10 the US as much of the rest of the world,
11:12 but in particular,
11:14 the US is going through a very stressful period,
11:16 stresses from immigration,
11:18 finance, internal political issues,
11:22 polarization at the parties, and so on.
11:25 But it's not reacting well,
11:28 and I'm afraid the lashing out is going to get toxic,
11:31 and it should learn a lesson from other things
11:34 that humans have gone through, and in particular,
11:36 the England that had an empire and it's gone,
11:40 but it turned out to be a fairly benign,
11:44 accommodating country.
11:46 You know, it's not by accident
11:48 that the masters of these refugees
11:51 that flooded Europe recently
11:53 were trying to get through the tunnel.
11:54 Even once they got to Europe,
11:55 they still trying to get through the channel to England,
11:58 which connects to Brexit,
12:01 you know, we've seen as an existential threat.
12:03 Yeah, we still buy those whose minds are so close
12:09 to what makes Britain great, right?
12:13 And I'd be careful how I phrase that.
12:15 But I'm speaking from across the perspective,
12:17 across the point,
12:19 what has made Great Britain as we know it,
12:22 and it's not perfect,
12:23 and I can tell you many, many stories
12:26 about its imperfections is the open-mindedness.
12:30 What you learn when you travel?
12:32 So when you, people come to the country in whatever way,
12:36 shape or fashion they get there,
12:38 you have an understanding.
12:39 And I think the educational system has
12:41 a lot to do with it as well in terms of it.
12:44 Let me really throw a wrench in,
12:46 we're nearly the break, but we can get started.
12:52 Part of the dislocation in the US at the moment
12:54 is a mixture of politics and religion.
13:00 Those are the two topics
13:01 just supposedly don't bring up normally,
13:03 but they characterize this program
13:05 or at least commentary on...
13:08 But this is not a political program,
13:09 but we are always talking about
13:11 things that have political ramifications or in politics,
13:15 and religion is right in there.
13:19 We've just extolled England for relative success,
13:22 but what's the role of religion
13:24 in English society and governance?
13:26 Well, you ask any Brit regardless of stripe,
13:31 and they will tell you, "That's a private matter.
13:34 That's a personal matter.
13:35 We don't need to discuss that, we live and let live."
13:39 We don't make legislation based upon religious attitudes
13:44 or perceptions of what is,
13:45 you know, acceptable or not acceptable.
13:48 So when did it become private? How did it become private?
13:50 I know that attitude,
13:51 and I didn't think you'd say that so simply,
13:53 but I know that that's.
13:56 In Australia, the same, that's what's thought.
13:58 And it isn't a private matter per se,
14:00 but it shouldn't be a public matter
14:02 as far as government
14:05 to get involved in projecting religious values
14:10 and dictates to the whole.
14:12 No, and that's...
14:13 And, of course, we have the first amendment designed
14:15 to protect that, but that's disputed
14:17 in the US today.
14:18 We need to take a break.
14:20 So stay with us.
14:21 And we will delve further
14:23 into this discussion of religion and politics,
14:26 and how it's operating on either side of a great pond.


Home

Revised 2019-04-19