Liberty Insider

Martin Luther to MLK Junior

Three Angels Broadcasting Network

Program transcript

Participants: Lincoln Steed (Host), Nicolas Miller

Home

Series Code: LI

Program Code: LI000356B


00:04 Welcome back to the Liberty Insider.
00:07 Before the break if you remember
00:09 with Nic Miller, I was twisting your knots
00:13 on interpreting Martin Luther, not Martin Luther King
00:17 but Martin Luther to Martin Luther King.
00:20 And we were looking at the Civil Rights Movement.
00:22 But more than that what I want to pursue
00:24 is the principle of democracy
00:27 that we have today in the West and then in the United States
00:31 which I think we assume and perhaps it's correct
00:34 that this is biblical
00:37 and even a Protestant viewpoint.
00:39 Well, it's hard to say that
00:41 the Bible promotes explicitly a democracy.
00:46 But if you look at the Old Testament,
00:47 there is a growing body of scholarship here...
00:51 contemporary body of scholarship
00:52 that's looking at the 18th and 17th...
00:54 17th and 18th centuries.
00:56 And recognizing
00:58 that a lot of the people that were promoting
00:59 democracy were drawing from the Old Testament
01:03 in terms of seeing a separation of powers there.
01:07 The king was not meant to function
01:10 as a priest and vice versa,
01:12 the prophets were a separate group.
01:14 And then even God's not wanting there to be a king,
01:17 that there was a kind of a representative
01:20 form of government through the elders
01:22 overseen by judges and prophets.
01:25 And so, there's been more of an influence
01:27 from the scripture on modern democracy
01:30 than it's been acknowledged.
01:31 Let me throw another cat among the pigeons.
01:34 I agree with you,
01:35 but perhaps
01:37 the more biblical concept of democracy
01:41 or democratic system
01:42 is what the United States actually has,
01:44 a representative government
01:46 where the free will of the people
01:49 can be expressed through public actions
01:52 rather than what the Bible says,
01:54 "Elsewhere everyone did
01:56 what was set right in their own eyes."
01:57 Right, right.
01:58 And I know that the American framers
02:01 had a deep fear of sort of the will of the people
02:06 in the group run amuck.
02:07 They were not in favor of a pure democracy.
02:09 Okay.
02:10 They saw the weakness of democracy
02:14 was that a demagogue,
02:16 someone who appealed to the baser instincts
02:19 and desires of the people...
02:20 We don't have any of those today, do we?
02:22 ..could turn the people in the direction
02:24 that was actually against the Civitas.
02:27 And so they constructed, many people don't know this
02:29 but originally we did not vote for our president
02:34 or even the electors.
02:36 It was the state legislatures that would choose electors
02:40 and it would choose presidents.
02:41 Well, more radically from what people imagine
02:44 that they originally,
02:45 the US didn't even have parties.
02:47 Well, and in fact, the founding fathers
02:49 were opposed to parties because of the party spirit.
02:51 But there's a very interesting story to be told
02:54 about the rise of Martin Luther's thought,
02:56 the freedom of the priesthood of believers
03:01 and modern democracies.
03:03 It was once thought that,
03:05 you know, the colonial imperial powers
03:07 of the western democracies exported
03:11 that religion was used as a tool
03:13 of coercion and control.
03:15 But some scholarship has come out,
03:18 specifically an article by Robert Woodberry
03:21 in American Political Science journal
03:23 which has successfully demonstrated
03:26 that the growth of democracy
03:28 in something like 70 countries around the world
03:31 is directly and strongly correlated
03:34 with the presence and activity
03:36 of Protestant missionaries
03:39 from dissenting free church tradition.
03:41 So not all Protestants, if you believe
03:43 in the combination of church and state,
03:45 then the church really can't speak
03:47 with a prophetic voice.
03:48 But in these free church traditions,
03:50 the missionaries would come,
03:52 they believed in the priesthood of believers,
03:54 everybody needed to read and write,
03:56 so they can read the Bible and share the gospel.
03:58 They would educate the mass populous
04:01 as effectively as they could.
04:02 They would stand up against the abuses
04:05 of the imperial colonial governments.
04:07 And then they created a people with educational systems
04:12 that could form the institutions
04:14 of democratic society.
04:16 So it's a very...
04:18 published in a secular journal
04:20 but it's causing many historians
04:21 to rethink the relationship of Christianity,
04:24 Christian missionaries and...
04:25 Yeah, no, there's some truth in it.
04:27 And there's also,
04:28 we have to acknowledge historically this,
04:31 you know, there's a reaction
04:32 in many third world countries now
04:34 to the colonial era
04:35 and the proselytizing missionaries.
04:39 And I think from their perspectives,
04:41 they're correct because the missionaries did go
04:43 in calculatedly to replace
04:45 whatever belief system was there
04:47 with the truth about, of the gospel.
04:50 So, I don't think...
04:51 Did proselytize, there's no doubt about that.
04:53 Yeah, I don't think you can get away with that,
04:54 but, yeah, it's a good point.
04:56 I also think...
04:58 The missionaries gave them the tools
04:59 with which they could stand up and...
05:02 By my analysis of imperialism which I have never lived under
05:05 but we both come from the British system...
05:08 Yes.
05:09 But, you know, looking at the British system
05:11 which is relatively successful
05:13 in inculcating democratic principles
05:15 around the world, but not always a kind system.
05:18 I think the secret was that they delegated authority
05:22 to a whole level of functionaries
05:24 in the colonies.
05:25 And I think that came and you know them,
05:27 couldn't see what your reaction is.
05:29 I think it came, yes,
05:31 from the type of religion
05:34 that characterized the missionary of it
05:36 whether it was the confessing churches
05:39 or whatever.
05:40 I think it came from how they related
05:42 other human to other human being.
05:44 The Catholic endeavors in the new world
05:47 and that suffered
05:48 because they always saw
05:50 the indigenous peoples as almost subhuman.
05:53 And there was a coercion...
05:55 That's not a climate
05:56 to pass any authority on when they lived.
06:00 And it should be noted though that they would seem to be,
06:03 they are always Catholic priests
06:05 who were speaking and standing up
06:07 for the native appeals in these places.
06:09 Well, there's good people in the world
06:11 regardless of the system.
06:12 But I think the system wasn't set up
06:14 to empower them when the authorities lived.
06:19 This is true and that is why liberal democracies
06:21 generally arose in countries connected with Protestants.
06:24 So, I think even though the Protestant missions
06:27 in lot of the, certainly the British imperial world
06:31 were working to replace their culture,
06:34 and imperialism itself was not a structure
06:38 we are comfortable with today.
06:40 That because of the missionaries,
06:42 because of the mindset even of the imperial powers,
06:45 they saw these people, yes, to be subjugated
06:48 but they didn't see them as inferior
06:51 or necessarily another level of human being.
06:53 So, I think that was an easy pass off
06:55 which has to come from religion.
06:57 In the image of God, right?
06:58 And the priesthood of all believers
07:01 and that while your brother may be
07:03 less educated than you,
07:05 you can educate them
07:06 and bring them into this social equality.
07:07 Which brings us to Martin Luther.
07:09 I think that's the genius of Martin Luther.
07:11 He used religion to reemphasize
07:14 the black men as just as much a human being...
07:18 Martin Luther King Jr., yes.
07:20 The image of God and I think that's where...
07:22 And it seems self evident now
07:24 but I know it wasn't in the '50s and '60s.
07:26 That's right. That's right.
07:27 But I think that it should cause us
07:30 as evangelical Christians today
07:33 to see in the current need
07:36 for a greater racial equality a calling of the gospel.
07:41 We can't link up with all the activist groups
07:44 who have a wide range of issues that we may not agree with,
07:47 but I think as Christians we should be able to stand
07:49 in the tradition of Martin Luther
07:51 and Martin Luther King Jr.,
07:53 for basic fairness and treatment
07:55 in our social criminal justice system,
07:58 our social welfare system,
08:01 because there is, even after we've...
08:03 I thought we had moved past explicit bias,
08:06 but with this recent political controversies we've had,
08:11 we have seen some of this explicit bias
08:13 come back.
08:14 But even apart from that
08:16 the implicit bias of our system,
08:18 studies have shown that we treat people
08:20 with different colored skin in different ways.
08:22 And I think, as Christians we have a,
08:25 we have a duty to look at our own hearts
08:27 and to see what unconscious bias
08:29 might lie there to bring it to light
08:32 and to prayerfully work our way away from it
08:35 to a greater unity
08:37 and inclusiveness in the body of Christ.
08:39 Good.
08:40 So the reformation is still with us.
08:42 Well, I think that the principles of it
08:44 once we understand it.
08:45 I'm trying to light it how do we...
08:47 Where do we go with this?
08:48 Because, you know, on the simplest historic level,
08:52 you know, I can see echoes of reformation
08:56 but it's really being negated or turned back in many ways.
09:01 Theologically it's been denied,
09:06 even,
09:08 maybe you read different stuff than I read,
09:09 but a lot of the stuff online at least is maligning
09:13 the memory of Martin Luther
09:14 and all that the reformation still...
09:15 Well, and it's also...
09:17 We are trying him as bigoted, as violent and so on.
09:19 Well, in its social political matters,
09:21 I mean, he did have trouble
09:23 with the things that he wrote about the Jews
09:25 and some other minority groups.
09:26 But his larger, the vision of his principles...
09:30 And one thing I'll say, it's his defense...
09:31 Bigger than who he was.
09:32 Remember, and I'll give the benefit
09:36 that the Catholic Church are now trying to reap.
09:40 When he stood up or nailed on the door in Wittenberg,
09:44 he was a Catholic priest.
09:45 Yes, he was. That was his context.
09:48 So, as he erupted
09:50 and had a great truth about how we look at the Bible
09:53 and a sense of, you know,
09:54 wanting to shake off his shackles his shackles
09:56 and emphasize freedom which I believe
09:58 came from another as well another threat of humanism.
10:01 But as he did that,
10:03 he was still captive to a lot of the biases
10:06 of the religio-political world and anti-Semitism
10:10 was big time.
10:12 You know, he's been blamed purely
10:14 for what happened in Germany
10:16 but I would connect it to with the religious viewpoint
10:19 that antedated him by hundreds of years.
10:21 Yes. Yes.
10:22 There was an ongoing bigotry that he was his own person.
10:26 More than even a bigotry, it was a demonization,
10:29 theological demonization of whole people.
10:32 Yes, we have to acknowledge that.
10:34 It didn't come to a good end but...
10:35 But the principles of Protestantism
10:37 eventually undid that would be my argument.
10:39 Absolutely.
10:41 And as we know,
10:42 Protestantism moved on from Martin Luther.
10:44 Well, and,
10:46 you are saying challenges to Protestantism today,
10:48 it's not just the challenges to the memory of Martin Luther,
10:51 it's also a challenge to the fundamental principles.
10:54 When we say that someone of a different ethnicity,
10:58 a different religious group, if they are Muslim,
11:00 they are not deserving of the basic human rights
11:04 and dignities that we have as Americans,
11:06 that is a rejection,
11:08 a repudiation of this notion of the image of God in all.
11:11 Absolutely, yeah.
11:13 Even though at different times in Protestant history,
11:15 similar things were said
11:17 but it was a moving awareness, wasn't it?
11:20 That's right.
11:21 And, you know, I'm quite convinced
11:23 from my study of American history,
11:25 that it's the Protestant nature
11:27 that really was the crucible that all of this came out of.
11:31 So I think it's fair to draw a link
11:33 between Martin Luther
11:34 and Martin Luther King Jr.
11:37 The movement that motivated both men
11:39 were at their heart, religious,
11:41 a vision of humanity made in the image of God,
11:45 and then that image of God being played out
11:48 in the social
11:50 and political systems of the day.
11:51 As Christians we have much to appreciate
11:54 and be inspired by this wonderful legacy.
11:58 In celebrating 500 years
12:00 since the Protestant Reformation,
12:02 it's worth bringing it forward to what it means to us today.
12:07 You could be forgiven for thinking
12:09 that the comments made a few months ago
12:12 by a certain Tony Palmer
12:15 that the Reformation is over might be true today.
12:19 Some people think it's over,
12:21 and it's true that the Lutheran World Federation
12:24 have come to sort of an understanding
12:27 with the Church of Rome.
12:28 And friendship is fine but revisionism is never good.
12:33 But in reality, the principles of the Reformation
12:36 suffuse our public life,
12:38 the way that United States government
12:40 in particular was set up was not religious
12:42 but it was mightily colored by the sentiments
12:45 and the principles that guided individual contact,
12:49 that conduct that came from the Reformation.
12:53 And toady, as we try to be true to those principles,
12:57 I think an adherence to the Word of God.
13:00 How we find it and interpret it by our deep Bible study,
13:04 and the principle of standing up
13:06 for truth against injustice
13:09 'cause there's a social justice element.
13:12 And for doctrinal truth this is vital
13:15 and is necessary in our day as it ever was in Luther,
13:19 Hus's, or Zwinglis, or any of the other reformers.
13:23 Today is the acceptable day, now is the acceptable hour.
13:29 For Liberty Insider, this is Lincoln Steed.


Home

Revised 2017-04-13