Liberty Insider

Refugee Crisis

Three Angels Broadcasting Network

Program transcript

Participants: Lincoln Steed (Host), Nicolas Miller

Home

Series Code: LI

Program Code: LI000352A


00:27 Welcome to the Liberty Insider.
00:29 This is a program
00:30 bringing you news, views, discussion,
00:32 up-to-date information on religious liberty events
00:35 both in the United States and around the world.
00:37 My name Lincoln Steed, editor of Liberty magazine
00:41 and my guest on this program is Dr. Nicholas Miller,
00:44 lawyer, professor, author,
00:48 you're sort of a man for all seasons
00:51 and a religious liberty leader too.
00:53 Yes.
00:54 There's many things that we could discuss
00:56 but let's hit what's really in the headlines at the moment.
01:00 Refuge crisis is clearly facing the world
01:03 and the new U.S. administration
01:06 I think have put the cat among the pigeons
01:09 by putting out an executive order
01:11 that limits certain countries' refugee ability
01:16 and the charges that this is prejudiced situation
01:20 on religious identity.
01:22 But there is some sort of religious discrimination
01:24 taking place.
01:26 And we should note a couple of things,
01:28 the order puts a limit on all refugees for 120 days,
01:33 and then beyond that refugees
01:35 from seven named Middle Eastern countries...
01:38 Yeah, and it doesn't say in the order itself no Muslims
01:42 or only Christians or doesn't say that.
01:44 No, that's absolutely right.
01:46 And it should be noted that while the seven countries
01:49 that are listed are Muslim countries.
01:52 These are the same seven countries
01:54 that under the Obama administration,
01:56 they were on a concern list
01:58 and a limitation of immigrant list.
02:01 And there are many Muslim majority countries.
02:05 In fact, Indonesia had it,
02:06 it has the most Muslims in the world
02:08 that aren't on the list.
02:09 So it's not on the face of it
02:12 an obvious attempt to keep all Muslims out.
02:16 And yet there's more to it than that, isn't it?
02:18 Well, we know from the election that there's strong sensibility
02:24 growing against probably even directly against Islam.
02:28 And I don't about you,
02:30 but it seems to me on one level
02:31 we could hardly blame the average person
02:33 who's not very religiously literate
02:35 because there is violence
02:37 that directly comes from Islamic sources lately.
02:40 I mean that's just a plain fact, isn't it?
02:42 That's right.
02:44 So it really hinges on whether you see this
02:46 as representative of all Muslims
02:49 and even if it were,
02:51 then do you act in a prejudicial way
02:54 against a whole group?
02:56 So this is a fair way of putting it.
02:57 Is this, are the terrorists actors
03:00 that represent
03:02 the logical implications of Islam
03:04 or are they extremist elements on the fringes of Islam?
03:09 And, you know, I think
03:10 Christians should be a little bit sympathetic
03:12 to this before 9/11 the largest terrorist attack
03:16 on American soil was by Timothy McVeigh
03:20 at Oklahoma City
03:22 who had been influenced by the Christian identity,
03:25 white area...
03:26 Well, this was payback for the government action
03:28 against the Davidians Waco religious group.
03:33 Waco Christian religious group though,
03:35 and there have been other, you know, the K.K.K.
03:38 claims a Christian identity.
03:40 So as Christians, we know that we have extremists in our wings
03:44 and we don't hold all Christians accountable
03:46 for that.
03:47 And I think in a similar fashion
03:49 given 1.7 billion Muslims,
03:51 many of them living overseas the vast,
03:54 vast majority 99 point something percent plus
03:58 are peace-loving,
04:00 law abiding citizens of the West.
04:02 Right.
04:04 Yeah, I would put it another way
04:05 it's, human beings,
04:08 you know, come in the wide variety,
04:10 but I think the vast majority of human beings
04:12 don't mean ill toward their fellows.
04:15 I think that's true.
04:16 I have a probably different view on this.
04:17 I do believe that what's happening
04:20 with the extremists is that the violent Islamists
04:26 is not an aberration of Islam,
04:28 it's tied up to its very history.
04:30 And I think it's connected very much to Quranic truth
04:34 and the Hadiths that most Muslims buy into.
04:38 But, of course, most Muslims would not do such things.
04:42 But my view is, yes, we need to recognize it
04:44 for what it is but even so,
04:46 that's not reason to be prejudiced against all Muslims
04:51 nor to restrict the right for them
04:53 to believe their faith.
04:55 But as a Christian there's a lot of things
04:56 I could point to especially...
04:58 I know I know, okay, I'll put it another way.
05:00 ..about killing...
05:01 There's a big discussion about freedom of speech
05:03 in the United States.
05:04 Right.
05:05 And people object to some sorts of speech,
05:08 but you know very well you have to protect bad speech,
05:14 I mean the speech that's offensive
05:16 to uphold the principle.
05:18 You don't allow, the freedom of speech means nothing
05:20 if it only covers a good speech or a pleasant speech.
05:24 That's right.
05:25 It's the speech that incites hatred or whatever,
05:30 so I believe it's the same in religion.
05:32 I don't have to necessarily agree
05:36 with Islam or Mormonism or whatever
05:40 to be willing to fight to the death
05:42 for their right to believe what they believe.
05:45 Right, but there's a difference between speech and violence...
05:47 Right, and so any religion
05:49 whether it's Islam or Christianity
05:51 if it veers toward violence,
05:52 there's civil laws that deal with it, we cant allow that.
05:55 But to say that one religion
05:57 is much more strongly predicated
05:59 towards violence is obviously gonna cause people to say,
06:02 well, maybe we shouldn't let these people in the country.
06:04 Well, let me play the devil's advocate,
06:06 I'll make a statement to you.
06:07 I think Christianity is a little more prone
06:11 toward violence than say Buddhism.
06:13 Buddhism, yeah, I think that's right.
06:15 Which is more meditative and introspective.
06:17 Right.
06:18 That is what it is.
06:19 Yeah, and certainly the history of the West would suggest that.
06:23 But let's come back to President Trump's
06:25 order for a moment.
06:26 You're right, which is really the discussion of the moment
06:28 that's scaring a lot of people up.
06:29 While it doesn't single out Muslims by name,
06:33 it does have a very interesting clause in it
06:35 that says, it identifies these seven countries
06:38 which are all Muslim majority countries
06:41 and then it says,
06:42 religious minorities in these countries
06:46 which are persecuted shall be given preference
06:49 for immigration.
06:51 So because these are all Muslim majority countries,
06:55 clearly a reference to protecting minorities
06:58 is a reference to favoring non-Muslim religions.
07:02 Well, it's very unfortunate
07:04 that it was expressed that way now,
07:06 but that has, as you know, always been the case.
07:09 No matter what country someone's a refugee from,
07:11 that's the point.
07:13 If you are being persecuted by the majority,
07:15 that calls for an asylum.
07:17 But can majority not be persecuted by a minority?
07:20 In fact, this happens in some countries
07:22 you remember countries
07:26 where the minority is sometimes in charge and can...
07:31 And thanks to the...
07:32 Well, Iraq...
07:33 ..the imperialist...
07:35 Iraq was like this too, wasn't it with the Baath party?
07:36 So effectively it is an attempt to discriminate
07:40 based on religious lines.
07:41 I think we see through this on the face of it
07:45 this is very logical prohibition
07:48 or coercion at the moment.
07:50 But behind it lies a larger prejudice I think.
07:53 I think so, and I think that once the courts examine it
07:57 that they will have constitutional problems
07:59 especially as they look at the rhetoric
08:02 that surrounded the implementation
08:04 and signing of it.
08:05 But even if the courts find that way
08:08 I think we're in a very dangerous
08:10 and have been for decades
08:11 it's nothing to do with just the last few weeks,
08:13 the dangerous dynamic with this rad...
08:16 this increase in radical violence
08:18 happens to be Islam.
08:20 It has been different periods of history...
08:24 Crusade position, Christianity...
08:27 I don't think getting much license
08:29 from the original text
08:31 but still the Christian community
08:33 were very empowered to violent acts
08:37 towards other groups.
08:39 That's right.
08:40 But, you know, we're in a phase now that
08:42 if I had to date it from anything it's us,
08:46 our proxies,
08:49 during the fight against the Soviets in Afghanistan
08:52 we basically stirred the, fanned the fire of extremism.
08:56 Yep, that's true.
08:58 And we so did the wind
08:59 and we're reaping the whirlwind.
09:01 Well, there's a lot of alternative facts
09:04 that are circulating about the question
09:07 of Christian refugees in the past.
09:09 One of the claims that's being made
09:11 is that Christians under the Obama administration,
09:15 Christian refugees have been kept out
09:17 of America and Muslims have been preferred.
09:19 But the simple facts
09:21 Pew Research Center notes that in 2016,
09:25 for instance, there were about 80 something thousand refugees
09:30 allowed in from outside America
09:33 and a slight edge was found towards Muslims.
09:37 But it was about 50-50, it was about 38,000 Muslims
09:41 37,000 Christians.
09:43 And given that Christians are only 5% of the population
09:47 in the Middle East...
09:49 Well, the troubles in Iraq
09:50 were not equal opportunity troubles...
09:52 They don't fully represent...
09:54 The minorities were persecuted and even now under ISIS
10:00 it's not just Christians
10:01 but even some Islamic minorities,
10:03 but the Yazidis and other and, of course,
10:07 the Kurds which are an ethnic group,
10:10 not so much a religious group.
10:11 But, you know, there have been persecutions
10:14 but they're the minorities.
10:15 It's not the mainline Muslim group other than displacement
10:19 because of war itself...
10:20 But my point is...
10:22 .. wouldn't have a need for it.
10:23 ..that America has not been discriminating
10:25 against Christian refuges.
10:26 And if there was a discrimination,
10:27 it was in the early days.
10:30 For quite a long time the U.S. wouldn't take anybody
10:32 and I know I'm originally from Australia...
10:34 No refugees.
10:35 But Australia was taking them in when the U.S. wasn't.
10:37 Right, but it wasn't but it wasn't
10:38 based on religious discrimination,
10:40 we weren't just taking anybody.
10:42 And some have complained that the Syrian refugees,
10:45 there's a higher percentage of Muslims than Christians
10:49 in the underlying population.
10:51 But again those requesting immigration
10:56 to the U.S. happened to be a much higher Muslim segment.
10:59 There's some thought that the U.N. is discriminating
11:02 in those they recommend for resettlement.
11:04 But they are not discriminating in that way
11:08 from refugees from Iraq.
11:10 It appears that Lebanon
11:13 has a Christian government in leadership
11:15 and it seems that many of the Christian
11:17 refugees from Syria have family and friends in Lebanon
11:21 and they're stopping there
11:22 and therefore not needing to seek asylum
11:26 further in the West.
11:28 So where do you think this is going then?
11:30 Well...
11:31 We've agreed that it's not as bad as it seems.
11:34 We've agreed the terms, the technical terms,
11:37 are really not out of the norm, but maybe this underlying...
11:42 Well, you know, we are...
11:44 Sentiment is not good.
11:45 If this is allowed to stand and if the fans are flamed
11:49 towards radical Islam to include all Muslims,
11:53 we will be creating the stepping stones
11:55 for allowing the government to make policy choices
11:58 based on religious identity.
12:00 And ultimately that's not a good thing
12:02 if we continue down that pathway.
12:05 Well, you know, one parallel that I haven't read anyway
12:07 but I know history,
12:09 and we're not paralleling anyone else's history
12:12 but human behavior tends to repeat.
12:16 You know, in the German move against the Jews
12:18 that culminated in World War,
12:21 during the World War II and the Nazi regime.
12:24 But, you know, the anti-German sentiment
12:26 in Germany
12:27 wasn't a Nazi concoction but as that heightened,
12:32 there were actually a few incidents,
12:34 believe it or not, of Jews acting violently
12:36 against the regime and that that was used as...
12:41 Pretext or...
12:42 Pretext to move against the whole community
12:44 and I'm very afraid that
12:46 that's the dynamic we're heading into here.
12:49 These protests that we see from the Left Wing side
12:51 against the administration.
12:53 Protesting is fine,
12:54 but violence would be extremely counterproductive.
12:57 Right, I mean,
12:59 and we're certain to have a few more mass killings
13:03 and so on, and how will they respond?
13:05 We'll be back after a short break.
13:07 Stay with us.
13:09 And we'll continue this discussion
13:10 of breaking news basically.


Home

Revised 2017-04-06