Liberty Insider

Home Truths -part 1

Three Angels Broadcasting Network

Program transcript

Participants: Lincoln Steed (Host), Grace Mackintosh

Home

Series Code: LI

Program Code: LI000223B


00:07 Welcome back to the "Liberty Insider."
00:09 Before the break with guest Grace Mackintosh,
00:12 we were discussing--
00:14 and when I say discussing that sounds sort of bloodless
00:17 and just you know nice repatriate.
00:20 But we're getting quite worked up at least I was.
00:23 Internally I was getting very agitated
00:26 as you describe in Canada
00:28 how in the education field through the curriculum
00:32 whether it's in, in the schools
00:33 or in homeschooling there is a projection of religion
00:38 that would be confusing to young people.
00:40 And gets the parents say, they'll be tripped up big time
00:43 if they even suggest some alternative to child
00:46 or question some of these views.
00:48 And then it turns very strange
00:52 and joins in with this the gay gender
00:55 and the anti-bullying
00:57 and so religious viewpoint can easily be cast
01:01 as against the social good
01:02 and restrictive for someone's personal prerogatives.
01:05 Isn't this-- is that a good description
01:07 of where we're going? It's an excellent description.
01:09 And it's almost like a social experiment. Yes.
01:12 Where previously held views of morality
01:15 and that will be instantly suspect
01:18 and accused of being against the common good. Yes.
01:20 Against society. Yes.
01:23 What do we do about this? That's it is very interesting.
01:25 Well, there is a random sampling of opinions out there.
01:30 So in Quebec as we recently discussed
01:33 this curriculum that deals with religion,
01:36 ethics and morality is imposed in public schools,
01:41 private, parochial and homeschoolers.
01:43 So you have to teach it the way that is drafted.
01:45 You cannot teach in confessional setting.
01:48 And it is a very interesting dialog going on.
01:52 Now say that again.
01:54 I know what you mean but for the viewers
01:56 when you say you teach it in a confessional setting.
01:58 What do you mean by that?
01:59 You can't say to your child, no Johnny,
02:03 this is what the material says
02:05 but you know that Christians believe this
02:09 and the Bible says this and that God--
02:13 you know, especially if you're a Christian
02:14 there is no other God before me.
02:16 You know, there is curriculum is saying everything is equal.
02:19 That's incredible, isn't that? You can't say that--
02:21 And as I understand it
02:22 they've even stated in a homeschooling situation
02:25 it's not just during that formal sit down
02:28 that the parent may have with the child
02:30 to go over with the curriculum.
02:31 Since it bleeds through into a lot of their daily activity
02:34 they can't say it at anytime really.
02:36 Right because what's in educational opportunity. Right.
02:40 You know you're out and you're in about
02:42 at the breakfast table during worship,
02:45 that's the teaching moment. Right.
02:47 And you know that in the schools as well.
02:49 So-- So how does this differ?
02:53 You know that's a rhetorical question.
02:54 But how does this differ much
02:56 from what existed in Soviet Union
02:58 where a young people were being taught by the state
03:01 anti-religious viewpoints, antagonism towards religion
03:05 and encouraged to report on their parents
03:07 if they taught them otherwise. It has a very chilling effect.
03:12 The end result is very similar
03:13 I think if this is followed through
03:15 as they seem to tempt though.
03:16 And it feels very oppressive
03:17 and then we had said in the last program
03:21 that several days after the release
03:23 of the decision of the supreme court
03:25 with respect to the Quebec curriculum,
03:27 Alberta, the Government of Alberta tables
03:31 amendments to its education act
03:33 which made it a violation of the act
03:36 if you in an educational setting taught against homosexuality.
03:42 So hundreds of homeschooling parents
03:44 gathered at the Alberta Legislature
03:47 and to protest the education act the amendments to it
03:50 and they've said the restrictions to the freedom
03:52 to teach their children was in that those amendments.
03:57 And members of the Alberta Home Education Association
04:00 called on education minister Thomas Lukaszuk
04:04 to uncouple the Alberta Human Rights Act
04:07 and the education act.
04:08 Because basically as I said the amendment said
04:11 "If you were in violation human rights act
04:14 you were in violation of the education act
04:17 and then the department of education
04:21 the minister on presidential power."
04:24 And so they asked for clarification.
04:27 So in Alberta the human rights act
04:35 protects the front door
04:37 but these amendments were like a backdoor.
04:40 So in Alberta the government has thought about curriculum
04:46 like the Quebec curriculum
04:48 and if that was going to be taught in the schools
04:51 would the parents have the right to remove their children.
04:53 And they said yes and they put it in the legislation so--
04:56 But in homeschooling there quote on the side.
04:58 Well in a-- well it's the backdoor right,
05:02 so if you're child is in any school
05:05 and you aren't noticed like the human rights acts says,
05:09 that the school has to provide notice
05:11 that they are going to teach about homosexuality
05:14 or religion or sex education
05:16 or anything that you might feel in you know uncomfortable
05:20 you are allowed to remove your child
05:22 when you're given that notice.
05:24 And it's in the human rights courts.
05:26 So that's the front door.
05:28 But what the amendments to the education act
05:31 were the backdoor,
05:32 it's like okay, you can remove your child
05:35 if you're uncomfortable
05:37 with the material that's been presented.
05:39 If it has to do with morals, education, or sex
05:42 but you're not allowed to teach your child
05:46 that's it's a dangerous lifestyle.
05:48 That those people die young.
05:50 There are a lot of adult immune diseases.
05:52 There are all kinds of issues you can't teach that
05:54 because that's in violation of the human rights court.
05:58 And when the homeschoolers pressed
06:01 the minister for a definition
06:03 of what is in educational context.
06:07 They said, that they wouldn't provide them with clarification.
06:12 And the--like I said the amendments had two readings
06:18 and they were passed that two readings
06:20 they just needed a third reading to pass.
06:22 And Alberta went to the polls
06:27 with respect to provincial government.
06:30 And that government barely got back in it
06:32 and just squeaked in through the door.
06:34 So they probably gonna back off.
06:35 And we have--that's right, we haven't seen it since.
06:39 But it creates questions in your mind
06:41 is to what is the agenda. What's the agenda?
06:44 And I was speaking to a PhD he was at York University
06:49 I was speaking to him
06:50 and at meetings in Downtown Toronto
06:53 and I brought to his attention.
06:55 Well Alberta has already considered
06:56 the issue of curriculum
06:58 and they have given statutory rights
07:01 to parents to withdraw their children.
07:03 And what he said to me was, yes,
07:06 and they got it wrong.
07:08 There are certain dialogs that children must participate
07:13 and this is one of them.
07:16 They must participate in this dialog.
07:18 You're clearly passing on values.
07:21 You know, when you're talking passing on values,
07:24 yeah, the education department could do that in this case.
07:27 But when I think of how the gay
07:29 gender is being advanced
07:31 its largely being through the media
07:33 where they have been inculcating
07:35 this just constantly, constantly
07:37 and secondarily through the education department.
07:40 And what's the end result?
07:41 They have changed the entire society
07:43 to accept something that was once anathema.
07:46 So I wouldn't understate
07:48 that all the value of a new curriculum
07:51 to move not just people of faith
07:54 but a whole society in a direction
07:56 that might not have even been intended or recognized initially
07:58 under the guise of just information.
08:00 You soften up people
08:02 in this case compressional young people
08:04 to look differently on a value
08:08 that they themselves wouldn't inherently come up
08:10 and their parents wouldn't ever wanted them
08:14 to think that new direction.
08:17 Well, with respect to normative values
08:20 the three main contributors
08:22 that shape normative values are family, education, and media.
08:27 Sure media is and I'm not
08:29 in that well family should be first.
08:31 I'm not sure in the 21st century
08:35 where so much of time is being spent
08:36 even in the home in front of the television.
08:38 Not eating together and so
08:39 and you always can't put the family first.
08:41 But it should have been but I think the media is big time.
08:44 I agree completely.
08:45 And a lot of education as you know--
08:48 which I was in school and as far as the entertainment factor
08:50 but often they're watching a television program.
08:53 That's right. Or a video program.
08:55 So and you know I have seen plenty of studies
08:58 that you're normal defenses in the sense of perception
09:02 and the analysis and so on down
09:04 when you're just looking passively at a screen it
09:06 just sort of soak straight in. And soak straight in.
09:09 And this is why one of tenets
09:11 of the curriculum really bothers me
09:14 because it's thematic and that is the idea.
09:17 You know the indirect kick at fundamentalism
09:20 and not taking things too seriously.
09:23 And to me there is a whole normative value
09:29 built up around this issue of who is the next public enemy.
09:34 So you're teaching it in the educational setting,
09:37 if got it in the media the last time
09:39 I heard fundamentalism was at the Boston bombings.
09:43 Yeah, now we get to be careful in language.
09:45 Educators know this better than anyone.
09:47 Language can determine your viewpoints. That's right.
09:50 Your definition of word can--
09:52 well, gay we're talking about gays.
09:53 It's come to mean something totally different hasn't it?
09:56 It's going to mean something totally different
09:58 than what we have experienced.
10:00 And there is recognition among educators
10:04 of the power of curriculum.
10:06 And they have the children
10:07 during the formative years of their life.
10:09 And they have got them for eight hours a day
10:12 as supposed to the parents.
10:13 And when they let them go
10:15 the media has such a huge effect.
10:17 And I'd like to talk more about this in a future program.
10:24 For Christian looking at the life of Christ
10:26 there are those hidden years between as a very young child,
10:29 His family returned from sanctuary in Egypt.
10:32 And then as a grown man
10:34 he reappears on the banks of the Jordan
10:37 for Baptism in the beginning of His ministry.
10:40 What happened during this hidden years?
10:42 We know that He was largely taught by his mother at home
10:46 because when he at the age of 12
10:48 went to the temple
10:50 here this unlearned child was teaching them theology.
10:53 But can you imagine his mother teaching him
10:57 the truths about life and morality
11:00 and the great story of His people
11:03 and how the Lord had led them.
11:05 If periodically one of the church leaders
11:08 all of the centurions that come
11:10 perking through the front doors
11:12 and say you cannot say such things.
11:14 You're subverting this child.
11:16 That was the very essence of Jesus training.
11:19 Just as today no matter what the secular system
11:22 or indeed the church school they go to
11:24 at home the parent's role is to inculcate values
11:29 that are commensurate with that family structure.
11:33 That is the risk today where that is being restricted.
11:37 For Liberty Insider this is Lincoln Steed.


Home

Revised 2014-12-17