Liberty Insider

Obama's Olive Branch

Three Angels Broadcasting Network

Program transcript

Participants: Lincoln Steed (Host), Greg Hamilton

Home

Series Code: LI

Program Code: LI000130


00:23 Welcome to the Liberty Insider. This is the program
00:25 that brings you news, views, discussion and up to date
00:28 information on religious Liberty Issues.
00:31 In the United States, and around world.
00:33 My name is Lincoln Steed, Editor of Liberty Magazine.
00:36 And my guest on the program Greg Hamilton.
00:39 Welcome Greg. Glad to be here.
00:41 You are the President
00:42 of the Northwest Religious Liberty Association
00:45 among other things, but that's very important work
00:48 that you carry on there. Thank you.
00:50 Now like all of us working with Religious Liberty
00:53 you're watching political events very closely in particularly
00:56 in the United States, because so much of what we do
00:58 relates to the US Constitution and separation
01:00 of church and state. Very important principle.
01:03 Now, President Obama came in at an incredible time,
01:07 the economy collapsing and then quickly,
01:11 great polarization of political viewpoints.
01:13 You know, he's been called a socialist,
01:15 a communist, a Muslim.
01:19 He definitely has an agenda. How do you see the developments
01:23 under his presidency and his agenda
01:26 and all relating to Religious Liberty?
01:28 Well, obviously circumstances come to him,
01:30 worldwide events come to him as they come.
01:32 But I think as we explain in another show
01:34 we have to look his childhood background.
01:36 In terms of his religion, what is he?
01:39 Or what religion is he? Absolutely.
01:43 By the way, I know, you know this very well,
01:46 but it's worth reminding our viewers,
01:48 that this is not a mystery, because twice that I know
01:51 of at a national prayer breakfast about a month ago.
01:53 And then in 2006 he gave long presentations
01:58 on his religious upbringing, he characterized himself
02:01 as very secular, his family is almost anti-religious.
02:04 But then he gave very ringing affirmation
02:06 of his religious commitment in recent years.
02:09 Yeah, that's what I wanted to address,
02:10 is that we have to look at his childhood specifically,
02:14 because his mother was an Atheist,
02:16 his real father was a Jack Muslim,
02:19 always getting in trouble with the Muslim authorities
02:21 in Canada, in Kenya.
02:23 And his stepfather, in Jakarta, Indonesia,
02:26 the same problem and they were both Jack Muslims.
02:29 So this idea that somehow Obama have developed Muslim
02:32 just because he attended a Madrassa School for life.
02:35 Is it not a Madrassa school? Well, yeah.
02:37 In, I need to qualify this, I've been to Indonesia,
02:42 by law there, Islam is taught in the schools
02:47 and there are a few non-Islamic schools
02:49 are Seventh-day Adventist church run schools.
02:51 But they are forbidden to teach Muslims.
02:55 So if one Muslim child comes to your school,
02:58 you have to hire a Muslim teacher to teach the...
03:00 Well, he had some prevailing...
03:03 I'm sure he had all Muslim teachers.
03:05 Right. For about a year and a half
03:06 and they didn't last long and but most of his education
03:11 was actually in Catholic schools,
03:13 which his grandfather, his grandmother were Catholic.
03:15 So, he had this eclectic mix. In fact he said prior
03:19 to winning for President, he says I felt confused,
03:22 even when he was a social coordinator in Chicago,
03:26 he a Community Organizer. Community Organizer, yeah.
03:29 He said that I felt lost, I felt like I didn't have
03:34 a faith and you can read this in Steve Mansfield's book
03:38 "Barack Obama's Faith" and it's a interesting book
03:41 because he says his faith is eclectic
03:44 and that's why young people can relate to him.
03:45 It's almost like anything goes. And when he decided upon
03:49 Pentecostal forms of Christianity
03:51 or Christianity itself. He says, Obama says,
03:55 I found myself, I found Jesus and I accept Jesus
03:59 as my personal Savior. Yes, this is gonna be.
04:00 So, I had a hard time with people who say
04:02 that Obama is a Muslim, actually he is a new ager
04:06 in a way because, you know,
04:08 all paths lead to heaven in Obama's thinking really.
04:11 Because that's where he comes from,
04:13 that's where he is at. And it leads to our discussion
04:18 of Obama's Olive Branch doctrine,
04:21 which I'd believe as his actual foreign-policy doctrine.
04:24 And it's centered around Interfaith,
04:28 Interfaith Alliances. And it actually is at the core,
04:32 its central to his overall foreign-policy,
04:36 as described in his speech both in Turkey and also in Cairo.
04:41 The one that everybody remembers is the June 2009
04:45 big speech before government leaders,
04:47 military leaders and religious leaders in Cairo, Egypt.
04:49 And I think that those speeches had a lot to do with at least
04:53 creating a climate for this radical movement
04:57 within the Middle East recently. Yeah, in fact Thomas Friedman
04:59 in New York Times gave just that endorsement.
05:02 He said that people forget about his 2009 speech in Cairo,
05:06 which attempted to distance himself
05:08 from the Bush administration, which was in your face
05:12 democratic reform, you know, or else.
05:14 And he is saying no, we're not gonna force
05:17 you politically or religiously to adopt Americas ways
05:21 or our ways of thinking whether it's Christian or otherwise.
05:24 Now, the Right Wing Republicans mostly criticized him
05:29 for apologizing for America, I didn't really see it that way.
05:33 But they feel that we should be like Bush in your face.
05:35 That is psychologically as far as a human approach,
05:40 I think this is more likely to be feat isn't it?
05:43 But what is a feat, can we agree?
05:44 Well. What with where this is heading?
05:46 The problem is when it comes to Religious Freedom
05:49 and this is the problem, is Religious Freedom
05:52 is being acquainted with religious tolerance
05:54 in many of President Obama's speeches.
05:57 Well, he is, he changed the term right?
05:59 From freedom of worship, not changed that but
06:02 there was shift to mostly using freedom of worship
06:05 rather than freedom of religion. Correct.
06:07 And we know that there is world of difference between, yes,
06:09 how you apply those. Yes, and the difference
06:11 is basically this. And this is the problem
06:14 with Interfaith Movement that I see everywhere including
06:17 Interfaith Alliance in Portland, Oregon where I belong,
06:19 oh! I remember that, and that is you have,
06:22 you know, we can talk about religion,
06:25 we can talk about our individual faith.
06:27 And respect one and another. That's otherwise call
06:30 peaceful coexistence in Indonesia under the 5 point
06:34 philosophical bases of Indonesia's Constitution
06:38 it's called Pancasila. And it', it's otherwise known as
06:41 peaceful coexistence, you have a right to share
06:44 your faith as long as it, it's agreed to by
06:49 the other person and not forced up on him.
06:51 But you do not have a right to evangelize them
06:53 nor do you have a right to convert okay
06:56 and that's flies in the face of article 18
07:00 of the Universal declaration of human rights
07:01 in the covenants. And that's problematic,
07:05 it also flies in the face of the US Constitution idea
07:08 of equality of all religions under the law.
07:12 And so, now I'm not saying that Obama means that to be
07:16 bases of Religious Freedom here in America not at all.
07:19 He's now willing to tackle that mindset where it exists.
07:22 He's saying, I want to meet Muslims
07:23 where they're at. Because this is probably
07:25 the only realistic destination we can arrive at,
07:29 in terms of democratic reform and Religious Freedom
07:31 in those worlds. I mean,
07:33 can you imagine in Saudi Arabia, the whole idea
07:35 of the American model of Religious Freedom
07:38 probably wouldn't happen. But, what it does mean
07:40 is that he is not troubling within those countries
07:43 like Egypt some what and uncertainly Saudi Arabia
07:47 where it's against the law to convert.
07:49 Like just before the uprising in Egypt a survey was taken.
07:54 And I think it was 80 plus percent of that survey said
07:59 that they would support the law even the death penalty
08:01 on the law against conversion. So the whole mindset
08:05 in that whole country is against changing religious identity.
08:09 Lot of people don't realize that even
08:11 the Bush administration and the Obama administration
08:13 is basically saying the same thing,
08:15 it didn't originate with Obama. But, they are basically saying,
08:18 as with Condoleezza Rice, the Former Secretary of State
08:21 and George W. Bush. There was this idea
08:23 that Sharia law can be compatible
08:27 with democratic reform, which I think
08:30 is wholly nonsense. Yeah. And nevertheless,
08:34 that is their mindset and this is coming out
08:38 in the news quite a bit, by from very credible
08:40 foreign policy experts, not on the far right
08:42 but credible people like Fareed Zakaria,
08:47 you name it, even the Defense Secretary
08:49 Robert Gates. Well, the way its floating.
08:51 And I've heard a number of discussions is that we keep
08:53 our western law, or constitution
08:55 and all that goes with it. But in day to day matters
08:58 people be subject to a Sharia law court.
09:00 But they don't realize that there is an essentially
09:03 incompatibility between the two. So you can't have this operate
09:06 and then the regular civil law kick in at a certain level.
09:10 These will be in conflict from day one even on matters
09:14 of marriage and divorce and so on...
09:15 Well, women's right. Instantly, they would
09:17 be deprive to civil rights that the constitution.
09:20 And the whole concept of the roles of church
09:21 and state, it would be very problematic.
09:24 Well, it doesn't accept it, there is no separation.
09:25 Right, Well, there is a separation
09:27 in one sense. In the Sunni system they believe
09:29 that cleric should not rule, where as in the Shiya system
09:32 which is in Iran. They say that clerics absolutely
09:36 must rule. So, that's the clear difference
09:38 between the two. Well yes,
09:39 that's the custom but in... from the Quran they do not
09:43 acccept that the religious affairs to be separate
09:47 of civil affairs. Right, that's right.
09:49 And the religious economy rules the State.
09:51 And there is, these optimistic reports even
09:53 by various Muslim professors that teach at Harvard
09:56 and else where. They are saying that,
09:58 there is no problem. There will be separation
10:02 of church and state. You know,
10:03 I'm hearing this all the time.
10:04 Yeah, I don't know why they are saying.
10:06 I don't know why? Either they're thoroughly
10:07 deluded and you hope not, because then you wonder
10:09 about their intelligence or they're being disingenuous.
10:12 And I think there is an effort not so much to deceive people
10:15 but they see an inevitability in this,
10:17 they want to sort of rationalize,
10:19 well it will be okay. But I think
10:21 it's an intellectually dishonest way to carry the argument.
10:24 So, where does this take U.S Foreign Policy,
10:27 I mean, the whole Arab unrest seems
10:29 to be reshaping United States International
10:34 Religious Freedom policy. And I think it's going down
10:38 a road that it is almost as harmful
10:41 to true Religious freedom, as the hard right
10:44 approach is that. Well unless you accept
10:47 democratic reform, we're gonna put
10:50 economic sanctions on you. And if you don't reform after
10:53 a certain amount of years, we're going to attack you.
10:55 I mean, you know, the idea of religious force
11:01 is... abomination. So, you have these two factors,
11:06 you got the crusade mentality, you got the Jihadist mentality.
11:09 The two extremes and Obama is trying to reach the middle
11:12 but where does this lead. Well, in some ways,
11:15 I mean in leads in many different directions.
11:17 But in some ways it's prepared to do to the world what politics
11:21 has done for a long time, divide it up into
11:23 spheres of influence? And as long as
11:25 the Islamic Philosophy can have interaction with
11:29 the Christians Philosophy, but don't meddle
11:31 with the prerogatives of one area over the other.
11:34 Barack Obama points to Indonesia as the model
11:38 for Religious Freedom for the rest of the,
11:40 or for the Arab-Muslim world. Indonesia being in the...
11:44 It's one of the best cases, it's not an ideal situation.
11:48 Yeah, exactly and so this peaceful coexistence
11:51 or Pancasila that's always being referred to by President Obama.
11:55 The problem with it is that, I'm reading in the news
11:57 constantly that the persecution of Christians and especially
12:01 by Generals who are rising up, I just read the report
12:04 two days ago. Generals rising up
12:06 and supporting the extreme Islamic fundamentalists,
12:09 the Islamists in Indonesia. Indonesia is starting
12:12 to tip backwards as we speak. That's my take.
12:15 Towards major all out civil war and revolution again.
12:19 And so, this model that's being proposed is short sighted.
12:24 Yes, absolutely. And there is no question
12:28 that the US in some ways acts like a baby in the war zone
12:31 on international religion, religious affairs.
12:34 And it's possible that this President with good intentions
12:38 is pursuing a dangerous course on Religious freedom
12:41 and the separation of church and state.
12:42 We'll be back after a short break
12:44 to continue this discussion, a very interesting one
12:47 on how US policy in matters of Religious Freedom
12:50 impacts Religious Freedom here and abroad.
13:03 One-hundred years! A long time to do anything,
13:06 much less publish a magazine, but this year Liberty,
13:10 the Seventh-Day Adventist voice of Religious Freedom,
13:13 celebrates one hundred years of doing what it does best,
13:17 collecting, analyzing, and reporting the ebb
13:20 and flow of religious expression around the world.
13:23 Issue after issue, Liberty has taken
13:26 on the tough assignments, tracking down threats
13:28 to Religious Freedom and exposing the work
13:30 of the devil in every corner of the globe.
13:33 Governmental interference, personal attacks,
13:36 corporate assaults, even Religious Freedom issues
13:39 sequestered within the church community itself have been
13:41 clearly and honestly exposed. Liberty exists for one purpose,
13:46 to help God's people maintain that all important
13:49 separation of Church and State, while recognizing the dangers
13:53 inherent in such a struggle. During the past century,
13:56 Liberty has experienced challenges of its own,
13:59 but it remains on the job. Thanks to the inspired
14:03 leadership of a long line of dedicated Adventist Editors,
14:06 three of whom represent almost half of the publications
14:08 existence and the foresight of a little woman
14:11 from New England. One hundred years of struggle,
14:14 one hundred years of victories, Religious Freedom isn't just
14:18 about political machines and cultural prejudices.
14:21 It's about people fighting for the right to serve the God
14:26 they love as their hearts and the Holy Spirit dictate.
14:30 Thanks to the prayers and generous support
14:32 of Seventh-day Adventists everywhere,
14:34 Liberty will continue to accomplish its work
14:37 of providing timely information, spirit filled inspiration,
14:40 and heaven sent encouragement to all who long to live
14:44 and work in a world bound together
14:47 by the God ordained bonds of Religious Freedom.
15:01 Welcome back to the Liberty Insider.
15:03 Before the break, I was talking with guest
15:05 Greg Hamilton about Religious Liberty
15:08 as relates to US foreign policy under President Obama.
15:11 They've been some big changes both in foreign policy
15:15 and in global events, so Religious Liberty
15:17 is front and center, it's not just something
15:20 that you can sort of ignore, but big things are happening
15:23 out there. Oh absolutely.
15:24 And during the break I was talking to you about
15:27 Samuel Huntington. He's the founder
15:28 of Foreign Policy Magazine. He died not long ago,
15:31 you were telling me too. Yeah, he died just
15:33 a couple of years ago but he is the one that wrote
15:35 that famous article in Foreign Affairs Journal
15:37 called "The Clash Of Civilizations"
15:40 and then he later rewrote into a book format
15:43 "The Clash Of Civilizations And Remaking Of World Order."
15:45 I heard him giving a lecture not too long before he died.
15:48 Fascinating, very fascinating then I asked
15:50 him a few questions with I wanted to found out
15:53 if he thought that his philosophy applied to Iraq
15:57 and all of those events. If all of the foreign policy
15:59 experts his philosophy or his point of view
16:03 is still pretty much on track. The only where,
16:06 the only place he differs. Well, he didn't like the idea
16:09 in some ways he didn't like to see it is a full-blown clash.
16:13 Well, he predicted that Islam in the long run would trump over
16:19 Christianity worldwide in terms of dominance of Germany
16:22 and all that stuff. And his obviously
16:26 I think he's wrong, Philip Jenkins in his book
16:28 "The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity"
16:30 Who now is a Professor at Baylor University said
16:34 that this is nonsense, he said actually Christianity
16:37 is growing half, half as fast, if not faster,
16:41 ah well faster but half more faster,
16:45 how are we gonna say that then Islam and that by 2050,
16:49 we will still be ahead of Islam, there is no way Islam
16:52 is ever gonna catchup. And Huntington says
16:55 that Islam will dominate because of birthrate
16:58 that they evangelize or they attempt to conquer
17:03 the world by having numerous and numerous children
17:06 where as Christians try to convert through pure
17:09 persuasion and evangelism. And so he says,
17:11 Christianity losses. And Philip Jenkins says,
17:14 no, actually the sense of Christian revival
17:17 and evangelism around the world especially in the small,
17:22 the home churches in China is enormous
17:25 it's overtaking the world. But, where, Huntington is,
17:28 his as right as less on a violent military clash
17:33 then people shifts and changes demographic shifts.
17:36 And what he was talking about I think we see it played
17:39 out before our eyes in Europe,
17:40 we have those immigrant populations...
17:44 it's not so much breeding, but they're multiplying
17:46 and holding their culture and they're just making in roads
17:51 into indigenous culture. Samuel Huntington is the one
17:54 who emphasize in his book
17:56 "The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order"
17:58 that we ought to take a step back from the American ideal
18:00 of championing true Religious Freedom or the American idea
18:04 of Religious Freedom guaranteed by our constitution.
18:07 That is religious equality in the law,
18:08 and take a step back to religious tolerance because.
18:11 I don't realize that. Oh, yeah,
18:13 I've read this stuff that. Yeah.
18:15 Now that would be a dangerous shift.
18:17 Exactly, exactly, so he said that we have to move
18:20 towards international consistence and uses the word
18:24 in that consistence, we have to learn to tolerate
18:27 each other, okay. And he goes on and talks about
18:30 religious tolerance but he said that basically is the model
18:33 that Muslims, the only model that Muslims
18:37 are gonna understand to a certain point.
18:38 And whether that's true or not, remains to seen,
18:42 I don't believe that you can even get that far with it.
18:45 But in terms of moderate Islam and this is real question.
18:50 What's a difference between moderate Islam
18:52 is there such a thing between moderate Islam and Islamist
18:55 or fundamentalist extremists. And that distinction is always
19:00 been made and I think that distinction is true
19:03 to a certain point. I think it's a cultural
19:05 distinction not a religious. Yes, I agree.
19:07 There are people who are moderate
19:09 but they're not moderate Islam. Then the term I would rather use
19:13 is nominalist. There are many nominal Muslims
19:16 just as there are many nominal Christian or Catholics
19:19 because which is the model of behavior that I...
19:22 Right. Because Catholicism has medieval.
19:25 Right. Constructs that brings with it.
19:29 But yes, I think we're in for a clash
19:30 in going back to Huntington. I think he was very correct
19:34 into identifying this before it was self evident
19:36 for most people. And it may not with me
19:39 that he saw, he was pushing us toward
19:43 more of accommodationist view with other religion.
19:45 But it may not be a clash after all, in my thinking.
19:48 The reason why Religious Liberty is harmed,
19:50 the American idea of religious freedom,
19:52 if it takes a step backwards both internationally
19:55 and eventually, nationally, domestically.
19:57 Then what happened is you have this interfaith model
20:00 that supersedes this American idea of religious equality
20:04 under law. That is the ability in free
20:07 marketplace of ideas in capitalistic forms of democracy.
20:12 The ability to preach, teach, evangelize
20:16 and to change religions whenever an individual wants to.
20:21 That's not allowed in the interfaith construct
20:25 or model. And this is the model
20:28 that Samuel Huntington champions.
20:30 The problem I have with that model
20:32 which is what President Obama seems to be championing,
20:35 is yet to be seen, I mean he may change course
20:39 and who knows. I'm not sure that he has
20:42 a real solid international religious freedom policy expert
20:46 in his cabinet. But, nevertheless,
20:49 it seems that the way it's going,
20:51 as you see a convergence of away from religious freedom
20:56 is the model towards religious tolerance,
20:58 that we tolerate each other in a state of peaceful
21:02 coexistence. That international model,
21:04 I'm afraid will end up being the national model.
21:07 And it maybe the only rational way in which ecumenically
21:13 unity occurs. We even see this with
21:15 Pope Benedict the 16th and his latest rounds
21:20 of talks in his discussions with Muslims.
21:23 Well communism from the very beginning has always frowned
21:25 upon proselytization. Sheep stealing.
21:28 Absolutely, and so it does,
21:31 it has tended to see as I said before religious communities
21:35 is like race, its something that you have,
21:37 that you are and you stay. And you can dialogue
21:41 with someone else, but you never shift from it.
21:43 Yeah. And yes, I think you are right certainly
21:46 about Obama's foreign policy. Its predicted on clearly
21:51 not on violence in spite of the no fly zone at the moment.
21:55 I think it sort of world that may,
21:57 that can sort of make do and you down stir this group
22:02 that might be aggressive. You don't have
22:05 radical Christianity that bothers Islam.
22:07 You don't have Buddhism bothering.
22:08 So, it would tend towards sort of a passive religious
22:12 live and let live arrangement. Earlier I referred
22:15 to Indonesia and Pancasila, within Pancasila or this idea
22:21 of peaceful coexistence that forms the basis
22:23 of Indonesia's constitution, which is 5 point pillars,
22:27 or basis of their constitution. You've got Secular Government,
22:31 you've got Sharia Law, mixed in with the idea
22:35 of Pancasila. So, you've got all three wedged
22:38 in together. I may state them earlier about
22:41 Indonesia that they don't allow others to convert.
22:45 They do allow conversion reluctantly,
22:49 and I wanna state this carefully,
22:51 they allow it reluctantly, but not without cultural
22:55 and severe implications and persecution.
22:59 If...If... Like I've said on this program before,
23:02 I remember very plainly when I was in Indonesia.
23:06 Reading in the newspaper story of a Hindu couple
23:12 that divorced and got into a custody battle
23:15 over their children and the wife converted to Islam,
23:18 because instantly that meant by law the children
23:22 had to go to her, because you cannot take
23:24 the children from an Islamic person.
23:27 And, by law as I remember someone cannot be allowed
23:33 to convert from Islam. Well.
23:34 Islam is the protected religion. Islam is the benchmark.
23:38 That's the way they make do. Okay.
23:40 So, it's not really reading exchange
23:41 of Religious Prerogatives. I'm really,
23:44 I am reading conflicting sources then because
23:46 from what I understand is that there is a profession
23:49 of that you know you can convert quietly.
23:55 Well, yes. Otherwise you will be persecuted.
23:57 Yes, well I mean the same in Saudi Arabia.
24:00 You're going to be beheaded if you convert from Islam,
24:04 but I don't doubt that now and then someone has done it
24:06 without telling anyone. But that's like any law,
24:09 you can disobey the law generally and unless it's known
24:12 and then the penalty dissolves. Then what you are saying
24:15 then complies or comports with my other research
24:19 which is a the basis of my paper.
24:21 That going down this Interfaith path is peaceful coexistence
24:24 of model is very harmful to religious freedom as we know it.
24:30 And, because if you're not allowed to convert,
24:32 which seems to be clear in the Indonesian model,
24:35 then why does President Obama sight it as the model
24:38 for the rest of Islam. It could be problematic
24:40 and I wrote an editorial in Liberty discussing
24:43 this religious freedom versus freedom of worship.
24:46 And I gave them a pass, I thought maybe it was just done
24:50 not recognizing the import of the terms and worst with just
24:56 a desire to placate some of these mostly Islamic countries,
25:00 but if it's actually a calculated policy,
25:02 it's very dangerous, very dangerous.
25:04 Well. Because religious freedom of worship
25:07 is absolutely that, you happen just
25:10 freedom of worship was what the communist allowed.
25:13 And, they hated religion, they wanted it to die up.
25:16 Earlier on they were prepared to send people to the Gulags,
25:19 but once that settled down. It was enough,
25:20 you believe in religion? Well we'll give a church,
25:23 we'll give you a time, you worship here,
25:26 you pray here, but don't dare go out
25:28 and try and spread it, don't give it to your kids.
25:29 And, eventually you'll die and that's the end of it.
25:32 What does it suggest about the future of the unrest
25:34 in the Middle East right now? It would suggest
25:36 the democratic reform could take the path
25:39 in unsitting monarchs and autocratic Presidents
25:42 and dictators, could take the path of actually
25:46 paving the way it with good intentions,
25:50 the path toward Sharia Law dominated in governments
25:53 and Islamist extremist governments.
25:55 Absolutely there you are on the same page with me.
25:58 I think well it may not happen in the first step,
26:00 I think we are on a irrevocable path toward that sort
26:04 of the construct. Yes, and it maybe possible
26:07 to have an International Coalition dealing with such
26:10 governments on reasonable terms of reference.
26:12 You're right, with a lip service
26:14 to your religion but don't bring it here.
26:17 So, that in self only is a self fulfilling prophecy
26:23 as Samuel Huntington's clashes of civilizations.
26:25 Absolutely. In a clash of civilizations
26:27 with Samuel Huntington, we have this idea that all
26:31 civilizations should learn to tolerate each other.
26:33 But, where does it that take us in terms of religious tolerance
26:36 as opposed to the American constitution idea
26:39 of religious freedom, which is the idea
26:42 of religious equality for all under the law.
26:44 It was suggest that two choices we have takes us down road
26:49 of the delimiting religious freedom all together.
26:52 Freedom of Worship is such a comforting sounding term.
26:56 But, for those of us that work with religious liberty,
27:00 we know that freedom of religion is another thing entirely
27:05 from freedom of worship. Of course we all want to worship
27:09 and acknowledge God and every one needs to be
27:13 convinced and committed in their own heart and serve God
27:16 with their mind. But when we are talking about
27:19 a civil construct and how we put that into practice.
27:23 Freedom of religion embraces everything,
27:25 that embraces public prayers, private prayers,
27:28 that embraces teaching my children about religion,
27:31 that embraces public witness, that embraces telling someone
27:35 else about God and bringing them to a conviction and a faith
27:39 action of their own. Freedom of Worship
27:42 can be as simple as just worshiping God
27:45 in a designated place and at a designated time.
27:48 We need leaders who understand that distinction and argue
27:52 for it not just in this country, the United States,
27:54 but across the world and in any system and in any place,
27:58 freedom of religion is primary. We must serve God.
28:06 For liberty Insider, this is Lincoln Steed.


Home

Revised 2014-12-17