Liberty Insider

Palestinian Law In Pakistan

Three Angels Broadcasting Network

Program transcript

Participants: Lincoln Steed (Host), Melissa Reid

Home

Series Code: LI

Program Code: LI000125


00:22 Welcome to the Liberty Insider.
00:24 This is the program that brings you news, views,
00:27 discussion, and just to update information on
00:29 religious liberty events around the world.
00:33 My name is Lincoln Steed,
00:34 Editor of Liberty Magazine.
00:35 And our guest on the program is Melissa Reid,
00:38 who is Associated Editor for Liberty Magazine.
00:41 So, we're keeping it pretty much liberty
00:44 oriented for this program. Absolutely,
00:46 I can't think of a better way to do it.
00:47 Yes, a lot of our viewers know we do rotate
00:51 through any number of experts and other
00:52 religious liberty workers, yes, who have their
00:55 own different perspectives to add.
00:58 I want to discuss on this program blasphemy.
01:02 I don't want to indulge in blasphemy,
01:04 because anyone with the respect for religion
01:06 their own or someone else's will not knowingly
01:09 or would not want to offend by loosely or
01:14 outrageously presenting some of the concepts,
01:17 of course. The blasphemy has a long history,
01:19 doesn't it? Yeah, yeah.
01:20 Tell me if I'm wrong you know a little bit of
01:23 history too, but it seems to me there is an
01:25 apocryphal story on the Mayflower,
01:29 when they were coming across from England one of
01:31 the sailors ran to in drive and profanely
01:34 spoke of religion, like lightening.
01:36 Oh yes, descended on it,
01:38 I am pretty sure of that story.
01:40 I haven't heard that story. And that was the
01:42 popular view for many, for many hundred of
01:46 years back, and certainly in that era
01:47 that if someone took the name of the Lord in vain
01:51 or blaspheming against the holy things of the
01:54 church that you know heaven would strike them,
01:56 and if not heaven then it was the obligation of
02:00 the state and the religious authorities to
02:02 deal with such a person.
02:04 We certainly don't knowingly want to offend
02:06 another's religion, and we certainly know that we
02:08 are instructed by our Lord and Savior,
02:09 Christians not to speak blasphemy against God,
02:15 that said I agree we certainly have the history
02:18 of the government being involved,
02:20 and I think that's where we have the concern as
02:23 far as the blasphemy laws.
02:25 Since you have ever count a bit,
02:26 you know the Old Testament that
02:28 mandates this from blasphemy,
02:31 well yeah I, but that was the theocracy and
02:33 that's the wild card, it's not given,
02:37 it should not be given, and even in the Bible
02:41 it did not easily give the authority of the civil
02:44 state to execute things that were reserved for
02:48 the priest of, right right, and that was by
02:50 the first king of Israel got into such trouble,
02:52 he served that role. So and certainly in
02:55 our modern civil construct where we're keeping
02:57 church and state separate for the
02:59 protection of both. But it seem a blasphemy
03:03 law is very retrograde because almost by
03:06 definition it's setting out some sort of
03:09 favored form of religion, because you can't
03:11 say oh blasphemy. I mean we're probably
03:14 happy enough to "blaspheme" you know
03:19 the religion of we need the pew, you know some
03:24 could be some fantastic trivial thing,
03:26 right, right, and so it's not you know a
03:27 blanket thing, it would be used to support from
03:32 deformation a particular religious viewpoint,
03:35 right, right, and we don't believe the state
03:36 should be doing it. Right, and the reason why
03:37 we're talking about this topic,
03:38 today of course is the situation in Pakistan
03:41 who currently has a blasphemy law
03:44 on the books, and unfortunately we know
03:47 people have been in prison for it.
03:50 Yes, it's not really just on the books,
03:52 exactly; it's in the wall, and the roof of their
03:54 society. Yeah, I think,
03:55 I think they said last year,
03:57 it was a 110 people were accused of blasphemy in
04:00 Pakistan, and again so those situation haven been
04:02 accused you know that in the situation of the
04:06 housewife in that we in Punjab province,
04:11 in Punjab province, just a simple village woman,
04:13 yes, what it was she was out,
04:15 and she was a Christian woman in overwhelmingly
04:19 Muslim village, and the village
04:22 women decided that they would convert her
04:25 to Islam, right. So, while they are
04:27 fetching water I think it was,
04:29 they sort of set upon her, and barraged her with
04:33 request that you become a Muslim.
04:35 Right. And she said no,
04:37 she believed in Christianity,
04:42 she didn't believe in Islam. She didn't not say
04:43 anything specifically to vilify Islam,
04:44 but she said that she didn't believe it,
04:47 right, right, and that was enough,
04:48 they went to the Imam complained to him a few
04:51 days later, yeah, then he took it to the
04:53 authority saying that Islam had been defamed,
04:56 that Mohammad had been defamed, right, right,
04:58 and that alone was enough to invoke the
05:01 death penalty. Right and then of course we know
05:04 that events spilled out of control there,
05:07 the gentlemen who was the governor of Punjab
05:10 at that time gave an interview with NPR
05:12 on the situation, and let me just read you
05:14 little quote from there. He said this gentlemen
05:17 Solomon Tarsier is his name,
05:19 and he says before this no one was prepared
05:21 to discuss this law, it will set the mullahs
05:23 at your throat and I said that she should be
05:26 pardoned, talking about miss Bibi,
05:31 and this is a travesty and a shame that a poor
05:34 woman like this who hasn't the means to defend
05:36 herself against summed up charges,
05:38 and in the country where your prime minister is
05:40 Muslim, your president is Muslim,
05:42 you are 95 percent Muslim, so she is obviously
05:45 the religious minority there with the Christian
05:47 beliefs, very much so. What is the need for laws
05:49 like this frankly is for God to decide whether I
05:52 am a Muslim or not, and not some literate mullah
05:55 to decide whether I'm a Muslim or not.
05:57 And well this is the late governor of the Punjab,
05:59 exactly, that made that comment.
06:00 Right very soon after making those sort of
06:03 comments speaking out against this law he was
06:06 assassinated by one of his bodyguard,
06:09 and bodyguard has said the reason why he killed
06:12 the governor was because he has
06:14 spoken out against this particular law.
06:17 And it's interesting again justice is being sort
06:18 of taken into the hands of the citizen,
06:21 you know we mentioned that about 110 people
06:23 were accused of blasphemy in Pakistan,
06:25 and then some of those were then given the death
06:29 penalty. But it's more common that those that
06:32 are accused are killed or who speak out against
06:37 the law are killed rather than going to the just
06:39 system, they are killed by individuals,
06:40 by the modern mentality situations like that.
06:45 Modern mentality to the point,
06:46 but it's the mentality of the religious
06:48 community, right. In the one of the news reports
06:52 an imam said that he wasn't that concerned
06:54 whether she was released through the
06:57 legal system, because any good Muslim would
07:02 gladly kill her, yes, and sooner or later she
07:03 would be killed. Yes. And Pakistan is
07:04 probably one of the more egregious societies like
07:08 that in the world at the moment.
07:10 They, populous would execute that sort
07:13 of thing, the honor killings of usually
07:17 daughters, yeah, continues unabated,
07:20 never once has the state intervened to stop that
07:23 and people just rise up and exact this vengeance,
07:27 and it's incredible, you know I wouldn't like
07:30 to say that Pakistan I mean it would be false
07:32 that Pakistanis lack the normal human
07:34 sensibilities, they are like other people.
07:37 But the hold of this sense of religious
07:40 outrage is so strong on that society that people
07:43 will actually take what amounts to vigilantly
07:45 actions, so we got a double problem with this
07:48 law in Pakistan, it is a bad law.
07:50 But I think if the law disappear tomorrow,
07:54 we will still have the same phenomenon,
07:56 right, right, and we so we need to educate people
07:58 in this case in Pakistan,
08:00 even in the United States. I will jump across the
08:06 way people might not imagine many Christians
08:09 who are dealing with this gay marriage phenomenon
08:14 all the rest which is clearly in front to
08:16 Christians sensibilities need to be careful that
08:19 they don't make unduly inflammatory remarks,
08:22 and they don't react in the wrong way when
08:25 some of these non believing usually,
08:30 people make some rather very rude remarks about
08:32 faith, right, right. It can easily spiral into
08:35 the same vigilantly thing, would jump to another
08:38 connection that I can make.
08:40 I think this is not different from these
08:43 fundamentalist Christians in the Untied States
08:46 who shot an abortion doctor recently, right.
08:48 Sense of religious outrage but he
08:50 is going to take violent action to satisfy God,
08:53 right, I don't think God has called;
08:56 any God has called on us to do that individually.
08:59 Right, well you and I both have the privilege the
09:02 other evening of attending the first
09:03 freedom dinner down in Richmond, Virginia.
09:06 And one of our colleagues was honored,
09:09 we can talk about that little bit later,
09:11 but the lady who received the international award
09:15 you will remember her name better than I will,
09:17 but she is, Asmar Jahangir.
09:19 Yeah, this is special repertoire to the
09:21 Untied Nations for religion and belief.
09:23 You had been, had been, she is,
09:24 and she was not able, she was a Pakistani lady,
09:27 she was not able to attend, but her daughter
09:30 came and spoke on her behalf,
09:31 and I think I'm just moving,
09:33 moving speech she has been, she is in attorney
09:38 and she has worked in human rights cases in
09:39 Pakistan for the last 20 years.
09:40 So, she has been vocal, quite vocal about these
09:45 exact kind of situations she referenced in her
09:47 speech the other evening, the situation of the
09:51 blasphemy. And as we know people that speak
09:54 out of against blasphemy just look
09:55 at the governor of Punjab situation are
09:58 killed and so to have the courage and the
10:01 strength and the conviction to be
10:03 able to speak out in that manner,
10:06 and it's interesting one thing she said that
10:08 really struck me as representatives of
10:10 different religions we always encouraged this
10:12 inter faith dialogue you know we respect each
10:14 others comment, differences,
10:16 but we wanna discuss others comment,
10:17 commonalties. And she said in Pakistan it's just
10:20 not possible, there is not the climate to be able
10:22 to do that unfortunately between because you know
10:25 this one very dominant religion,
10:27 and then the minority religions.
10:29 That's fatigue, yeah, you were counting
10:32 that I was thinking yes dialogue is fine,
10:34 and most people like to or don't mind talking
10:37 with another religion in the larger sense,
10:41 and we have very good dialogues,
10:44 and you and I been part of them for some of these
10:47 with Muslims, with Mormons and
10:52 Scientologists you know you can go on and on,
10:54 Baptists even. Now there are some who are very
10:57 good friend, yes. You know,
11:01 we agree on that level, but when you got the
11:02 society that is overwhelmingly one
11:05 group or another, yeah they might talk
11:07 with someone else within their group,
11:09 they really don't have pluralism,
11:12 then the test is lot harder to pass.
11:15 And I think the U.S. has a great advantage
11:19 in that regard that till this point there has
11:21 been no one group that's had even large enough
11:25 minority to dictate to the others right.
11:28 So, it forces the pluralism,
11:30 forces the dialogue, right, but it raises the
11:33 stakes higher when one any one group is able
11:35 to get political advantage, they will then
11:37 revert I think to what is human nature as well
11:40 human nature in regard to religious activity.
11:43 Yeah, yeah, and I do want to also say we are
11:46 speaking specifically of Pakistan and situations
11:48 there, but in the article that I was reading on
11:50 this particular case, I did want to point out
11:52 there are several other countries that has
11:55 blasphemy laws still on the books there.
11:58 And Greece was the one that stood majority,
12:01 yeah, Greece, Poland, Indonesia, Egypt, Malaysia
12:03 Algeria, other countries. The US used to, right,
12:07 or at least the colonies used to have blasphemy
12:09 law, right. And all of Europe once did moved
12:13 somewhat away from that, but I think in some ways
12:17 the trend is moving back to it even though most
12:19 of this the rest of the world is affronted by
12:22 what's happening in Pakis, well in some most,
12:24 a lot of the rest of the world is affronted by
12:26 that. In essence we are tending to move back
12:30 toward at this recent resolution of the
12:33 Untied Nations about the defamation of religion,
12:36 yes, leads very quickly to this sort of maybe not
12:39 the death penalty, but to this sort of dynamic,
12:42 right, that would inhibit people speaking freely
12:44 about religion or holding and promoting their own
12:47 religion. Right, right, when he was talking about
12:49 just what exactly is blasphemy, what would,
12:52 what would fall under these particular laws.
12:56 And it says it's illegal in Pakistan for example
13:01 it's illegal to insult the Prophet Mohammad
13:03 or defile the Koran. Yeah that so often,
13:06 so often ended, it's just a way it gets.
13:07 Certainly we will come back after the break and
13:10 continue this. There are so many ramifications
13:13 on this topic, we will be back.
13:23 One-hundred years, a long time to do
13:26 anything much less publish a magazine,
13:29 but this year Liberty, the Seventh-day Adventist
13:32 voice of religious freedom,
13:33 celebrates one hundred years of doing what it
13:36 does best, collecting, analyzing, and reporting
13:40 the ebb and flow of religious expression
13:42 around the world. Issue after issues,
13:45 Liberty has taken on the tough assignments,
13:47 tracking down threats to religious freedom and
13:50 exposing the work of the devil in every corner
13:52 of the globe. Governmental interference,
13:54 personal attacks, corporate assaults,
13:57 even religious freedom issues sequestered within
14:00 the church community itself have been clearly
14:02 and honestly exposed. Liberty exists for one
14:05 purpose, to help God's people maintain that all
14:09 the important separation of Church and State,
14:11 while recognizing the dangers inherent in such
14:14 a struggle. During the past century,
14:17 Liberty has experienced challenges of its own,
14:19 but it remains on the job. Thanks to the inspired
14:23 leadership of a long line of dedicated Adventist
14:25 editors, three of whom represent almost half of
14:28 the publications' existence and the
14:30 foresight of a little woman from New England.
14:33 One hundred years of struggle,
14:35 one hundred years of victories,
14:37 religious freedom isn't just about political
14:40 machines and cultural prejudices.
14:42 It's about people, fighting for the right
14:45 to serve the God they love as their hearts and
14:48 the Holy Spirit dictate. Thanks to the prayers
14:51 and generous support of Seventh-day Adventists
14:53 everywhere. Liberty will continue to accomplish
14:56 its work of providing timely information,
14:59 spirit filled inspiration, and heaven sent
15:01 encouragement to all who long to live and work
15:05 in a world bound together by the God
15:08 ordained bonds of religious freedom.
15:18 Welcome back to Liberty Insider.
15:20 Before the break I was talking with Melissa Reid
15:23 about the blasphemy laws, and one of the current
15:27 situations in Pakistan. But it's worth going back
15:30 on blasphemy I think just to remember that while
15:34 this is egregious situation,
15:36 the concept of blasphemy has been
15:38 around for long time. And you know
15:39 Jesus Christ basically was executed for
15:43 blasphemy, right, right, when he was before
15:45 the Sanhedrin, they asked Him whether He is
15:48 a son of God. And the high priest,
15:50 when Christ said yes, he was so affront,
15:53 he ripped his robes, which under Jewish law
15:57 was mandated death for the priest himself,
16:00 high priest himself to do that.
16:01 But that was such an affront that taking away
16:04 should die and we can look from that point on not
16:09 just in Judaism, but in Christianity in Europe.
16:13 Blasphemy was accounted as capital offense not
16:16 taken lightly, and I think any true believer of
16:21 faith in there in itself knows that is one of the
16:24 worst things, you know the Bible says don't take
16:26 the name of the Lord in vain, exactly.
16:28 But we are not given to be the; the enforcer!
16:33 Yeah the enforcer or the agents of vengeance
16:35 for any faith, yes, right, and I think a
16:39 Christian particularity knows that the day of
16:42 God's vengeance is reserved for God, right,
16:44 and "I will repay says the Lord vengeance
16:47 is mine", right and of course, and under the
16:49 constructive religious freedom,
16:50 a civil construct we have to operate within the
16:53 laws of civility, and nonviolence.
16:56 Right, right, and unfortunately it looks
16:58 like in this contemporary times more and more
17:01 these are situations for individuals are being
17:03 set up. Well that's what it lends itself to very,
17:07 very easily, right, of course.
17:08 And with the vague sort of and you were talking
17:10 before the break about United Nations and the
17:13 defamation of religion situation there.
17:16 And I think lets explain a little bit to
17:18 our viewing audience. Again when we say these
17:21 things you know that it sounds like well
17:24 of course you know we're against people saying
17:26 good thing, bad you know defaming our creator or
17:29 redeemers, we think about as Christians,
17:31 but it's been interesting we as a
17:33 Seventh-day Adventist Church has spoken out
17:35 against these defamation of religion situations,
17:39 because and so have many protestant religions.
17:42 It's primarily been Muslim countries,
17:46 or organizations that have really pushed to have
17:48 these laws because again they are so very big,
17:51 the reason why we've been, you know spoken out
17:54 against them is because they have been so vague,
17:57 so broad, and it really does lend itself to.
18:00 Well that's why that even that they exist,
18:03 they shouldn't exist at all while they are
18:05 doubly bad, yeah, because their execution is bad.
18:07 But no, they shouldn't exists even I'd been
18:10 opposed to such a law even if it was $20 penalty,
18:15 right. It's still inappropriate, right,
18:17 for the state to be administering some
18:21 punishment for how you think or speak about
18:23 religion, your own or someone else's for that
18:25 matter. Right, right exactly.
18:27 So the lady that we mentioned earlier that
18:30 received the award the daughter attended.
18:32 She was one that was again very vocal on that
18:34 particular statement. And she had good reason
18:37 of course whether it's whole so of the cart as a
18:41 special repertoire for the United Nations.
18:44 In other word she is an emissary that goes
18:46 around investigating religious freedom
18:50 situations and reporting to them on what's
18:53 going on. I guess she was in that role because
18:57 she had a sensitivity before but particularly
19:00 dealing with so many around the world than
19:03 your own country she is doubly aware that this
19:07 is just not proper, yes, and very much in power
19:10 to speak at against it, and you have to admire
19:12 her and all like her, and there are many like her
19:14 around the world, yes. So, we tend to forget,
19:16 yes. It's easy to sit here on television and even
19:19 say something a little edgy which we are,
19:21 I hope we don't do too much,
19:22 but you know the consequences almost nil.
19:26 It's the worst generally as the people might stop
19:28 watching it, turn the channel,
19:30 the program might disappear, right.
19:32 But when someone like Asma Jahangir speaks out,
19:36 her life is on the line, right.
19:38 And her daughter was there in Richmond a
19:41 few days ago to receive the award for mother who
19:43 is because of legal concerns unable
19:47 to leave the country at that time.
19:49 But, how she will survive I don't know.
19:55 Even the prime minister of that country was
19:57 assassinated recently. So no one is above this
20:00 retribution, right, and her daughter we
20:02 heard had been abducted some years earlier,
20:06 and the mother had gone to the home,
20:07 and with others I think climbed over the fence,
20:10 and gotten her back from the abductees.
20:13 So this is the wild and wily, yeah,
20:15 western somewhat. Right, right,
20:17 now we certainly are blessed as Americans to be
20:20 able to speak so freely about our beliefs and our
20:23 convictions, and it's incredible like you said
20:26 you know to interact with individuals or to
20:28 hear about these stories. I mean this poor woman
20:31 in Pakistan who is now, who is currently still in
20:34 prison there. The governor was executed as we
20:36 mentioned but Miss Bibi is still in prison,
20:40 I think she has four or five children,
20:41 she is forty five years old.
20:42 Now this is a poor village woman.
20:45 Yes, that's the super tragedy that many people
20:51 would means or social connections can escape
20:54 this, but it's usually the poor people, right,
20:58 I use the word advisedly, but the ignorant
21:00 person, yeah, that get sucked up on with the
21:02 innocent. And now it's has become sort of
21:05 this national, you know there is this national
21:07 awareness around it, it's even I think more
21:09 troubling for her faith, because on the one
21:12 hand you know think that those that are
21:16 interested in forcing this law whether it's
21:18 through the law or like you said at the hands of
21:21 individuals who are passion about it.
21:23 I just, I certainly pray for this woman and her
21:25 family, because it doesn't seem to me like
21:28 it's going to be, have a good ending.
21:30 Let me throw in an interesting analogy
21:32 from an old film that I saw recently and
21:36 Dr. John Graz and I've been discussing it a bit,
21:40 you heard about it too. There is a film that was
21:43 well received many, many years ago
21:45 called the Seventh Seal by the playwriting
21:48 Ingmar Bergman, legendary Swedish playwright,
21:52 and it's almost like a morality play.
21:54 It wouldn't really pass muster under modern movie
21:57 conventions because it's really is a morality
22:00 play where a knight come back from the
22:03 Middle Age, in the Middle Ages from the Crusades
22:05 comes back to Sweden I think it is,
22:07 and it's in the grip of the plague,
22:09 and religious, prejudice, and natives religious
22:15 expression is running among.
22:16 People are believing that God is punishing them
22:18 with the plague, they are flagellating
22:20 themselves, and at one point he comes to a
22:24 little village, and here they are burning a
22:25 witch, but she is just a young village girl
22:28 who doesn't know anything and this guy looks in
22:30 the face, and he says have you seen the devil,
22:32 and she looks the demon uncomprehendingly
22:35 and babbling about Garbo protector,
22:38 and he says you know this poor little girl,
22:40 she doesn't have anything, and the rough soldiers
22:42 they are hoisting her up, inviting the fire,
22:44 and visually they are illustrated what was
22:47 clearly the fact that the Middle Age was
22:49 superstition run amuck, these cunning in-laws
22:52 where maybe on an interaction,
22:55 but more likely just some neighbor whispered,
22:57 didn't like this young girl, right, and here she
22:59 is hoisted up. And I really believe that this
23:01 is what is almost certainly happened to
23:03 this woman. The law is bad, right,
23:05 but the situation is egregious.
23:07 Right, it sounds like a neighborhood woman sort
23:09 of took advantage of the situation they had
23:11 some sort of falling out, or they didn't,
23:12 they didn't like that she want to maintain her
23:17 Christian faith, and so this is now
23:19 where it has gone. Our hearts certainly
23:21 goes out to her. Now we need to
23:26 make our viewers aware that this same occasion
23:28 in Richmond, yeah. This is the first freedom
23:31 foundation which is a very reputable religious
23:35 liberty organization based in Richmond,
23:37 of course Virginia, the home state of
23:40 Thomas Jefferson, and that's why it's
23:42 called the First Freedom, yes, connecting it to
23:44 Thomas Jefferson. They also honored
23:47 Dr. John Graz who has appeared on this program
23:49 many times before, right, several times,
23:52 and will appear again shortly.
23:53 We work closely with him; he is not only leading
23:58 the religious liberty for our well church of
24:00 Seventh-day Adventist, but he heads up the
24:02 Christian world commission as what's his title.
24:05 I don't know but, General, is he a
24:08 Secretary General, Secretary General, yes,
24:09 Secretary General, and the
24:10 International Religious Liberty Association,
24:11 and the International Religious
24:13 Liberty Association which is slightly older
24:16 vintage, even the Liberty Magazine
24:18 well over the 100 years. And is a Swiss
24:23 citizen still, he is very much the diplomatic
24:27 model of presenting religious liberty around
24:30 the world. So it was good from the point of
24:32 view what we're all doing for religious liberty,
24:34 and our shared commitments Seventh-day Adventist
24:37 to see him about this. Oh absolutely,
24:39 regulation, he is so, he was the national, yes,
24:41 award for their freedom award.
24:44 Yeah, he is so deservingly certainly that's why
24:46 wanted to make sure, show solidarity,
24:49 show solidarity yes. John, Dr. Graz,
24:53 one of the situation, one of the things that
24:54 he has feels encouraged to do is to travel around
25:00 the world. And I think he has been able to
25:01 attend some of these, because he holds these
25:03 festivals religious freedom all over the
25:05 world, and he not only you know do we like to
25:09 highlight, or do we feel it's necessary to
25:12 highlight situations where there is religious
25:15 discrimination, or religious persecution.
25:17 We also like to visit countries, and thank them,
25:20 and right, for the religious freedom that they
25:23 show their citizens are there.
25:24 It's a very you know public officials sometimes
25:26 come to different events that we organize,
25:28 but even when they don't come to such an event,
25:31 whether it's, one that he and I last,
25:33 I was last with him, that was in the
25:36 Dominican Republic and there were,
25:37 I think 20,000 or so people in the stadium
25:41 mingling around outside and all just yelling at
25:45 the innocent, you know thank you
25:46 for religious freedom, thanks you and it's
25:49 certain that the officials in that country would
25:51 pay attention, and that time when we were in
25:53 the country, they were in the process of
25:55 rewriting their constitution, alright.
25:57 And we heard from the minister of religious,
26:01 I think he was saying that they were consciously
26:03 writing in the separation of church and state
26:05 and the guarantee for full religion,
26:07 religious freedom. Oh praise the Lord.
26:08 Yeah, so that dynamic when people are publicly
26:11 showing their approval for religious freedom,
26:14 of course that reinforces the positives in that
26:16 country, and that's what we need.
26:19 Right, well congratulation so
26:20 much to Dr. Graz, and we feel honor to
26:23 call him our colleague, and we've certainly
26:26 enjoys ideas of your and Lincoln as the host
26:29 of the show, enjoy having him as
26:31 participate apparently certainly is a scholarly
26:34 man and well deserving of the honor,
26:36 and so we're just so grateful to be call
26:39 him colleague, and a friend.
26:44 This is sure blasphemy is a very troubling one.
26:47 It is true that in the Old Testament it says that
26:52 we're not take the name of the Lord in vain.
26:54 But also says vengeance is mine,
26:57 I'll repay says the Lord. The real issue is not
27:07 whether there is some consequence to taking God
27:08 or religion lightly, and speaking badly of it.
27:11 The issue is whether the state is to take it upon
27:14 itself to punish such miscreant or whether a
27:19 single religious group is to punish another for
27:23 speaking ill of their particular religion.
27:25 The security for all should surely lie in the
27:29 separation of church and state.
27:31 It should lie in the recognition that any
27:33 religion must be one that sinks the best of
27:37 fellow men, thinks the best of our fellows,
27:41 and represents the best in the higher values that
27:45 DAT represents to those around us.
27:49 Blasphemy, yes blasphemy exists,
27:52 but it is ultimately the highest blasphemy to
27:56 kill and persecute our fellows, because we do not
27:59 like the way they talk about what we ourselves
28:02 believe. For Liberty Insider,
28:05 this is Lincoln Steed.


Home

Revised 2014-12-17